scholarly journals Species distribution models throughout the invasion history of Palmer amaranth predict regions at risk of future invasion and reveal challenges with modeling rapidly shifting geographic ranges

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan D. Briscoe Runquist ◽  
Thomas Lake ◽  
Peter Tiffin ◽  
David A. Moeller
2020 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-11
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Ramírez-Albores ◽  
Gustavo Bizama ◽  
Ramiro O. Bustamante ◽  
Ernesto I. Badano

Background and aim – Invasive plants should only colonize habitats meeting the environmental conditions included in their native niches. However, if they invade habitats with novel environmental conditions, this can induce shifts in their niches. This may occur in plants with long invasion histories because they interacted with the environmental conditions of invaded regions over long periods of time. We focused on this issue and evaluated whether the niche of the oldest plant invader reported in Mexico, the Peruvian peppertree, is still conserved after almost 500 years of invasion history. Methods – We compared climatic niches of the species between the native and invaded region. We later used species distribution models (SDM) to visualize the geographical expression of both niches in Mexico. Results – The invasive niche of the Peruvian peppertree is fully nested within the native niche. Although this suggests that the niche is conserved, this also indicates that a large fraction of the native niche is empty in the invaded region. The SDM from the native region indicated that Mexico contains habitats meeting the conditions included in this empty fraction of the native niche and, thus, this invasion should continue expanding. Nevertheless, the SDM calibrated with data from the invaded region indicated that peppertrees have colonized all suitable habitats indicated by its invasive niche and, thus, their populations should no longer expand. Conclusion – Our results suggests that the niche of the Peruvian peppertree is partially conserved in Mexico. This may have occurred because individuals introduced into Mexico constituted a small, nonrepresentative sample of the full niche of the species.


Ecography ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 695-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. McGarvey ◽  
Mitra Menon ◽  
Taylor Woods ◽  
Spencer Tassone ◽  
Jessica Reese ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (11) ◽  
pp. 1074-1083 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.R. Trumbo ◽  
A.A. Burgett ◽  
J.H. Knouft

Species distribution models (SDMs) have become an important tool for ecologists by providing the ability to predict the distributions of organisms based on species niche parameters and available habitat across broad geographic areas. However, investigation of the appropriate extent of environmental data needed to make accurate predictions has received limited attention. We investigate whether SDMs developed with regional climate and species locality data (i.e., within Missouri, USA) produce more accurate predictions of species occurrences than models developed with data from across an entire species range. To test the accuracy of the model predictions, field surveys were performed in 2007 and 2008 at 103 study ponds for eight amphibian study species. Models developed using data from across the entire species range did not accurately predict the occurrences of any study species. However, models developed using data only from Missouri produced accurate predictions for four study species, all of which are near the edge of their geographic ranges within the study area. These results suggest that species distribution modeling with regionally focused data may be preferable for local ecological and conservation purposes, and that climate factors may be more important for determining species distributions at the edge of their geographic ranges.


Diversity ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora Oleas ◽  
Kenneth Feeley ◽  
Javier Fajardo ◽  
Alan Meerow ◽  
Jennifer Gebelein ◽  
...  

Species distribution models (SDMs) are popular tools for predicting the geographic ranges of species. It is common practice to use georeferenced records obtained from online databases to generate these models. Using three species of Phaedranassa (Amaryllidaceae) from the Northern Andes, we compare the geographic ranges as predicted by SDMs based on online records (after standard data cleaning) with SDMs of these records confirmed through extensive field searches. We also review the identification of herbarium collections. The species’ ranges generated with corroborated field records did not agree with the species’ ranges based on the online data. Specifically, geographic ranges based on online data were significantly inflated and had significantly different and wider elevational extents compared to the ranges based on verified field records. Our results suggest that to generate accurate predictions of species’ ranges, occurrence records need to be carefully evaluated with (1) appropriate filters (e.g., altitude range, ecosystem); (2) taxonomic monographs and/or specialist corroboration; and (3) validation through field searches. This study points out the implications of generating SDMs produced with unverified online records to guide species-specific conservation strategies since inaccurate range predictions can have important consequences when estimating species’ extinction risks.


2011 ◽  
Vol 56 (12) ◽  
pp. 2554-2566 ◽  
Author(s):  
KATHRIN THEISSINGER ◽  
MIKLÓS BÁLINT ◽  
PETER HAASE ◽  
JES JOHANNESEN ◽  
IRINA LAUBE ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Carlos Ramirez-Reyes ◽  
Mona Nazeri ◽  
Garrett Street ◽  
D. Todd Jones-Farrand ◽  
Francisco Vilella ◽  
...  

Conservation planning depends on reliable information regarding the geographic distribution of species. However, our knowledge of species' distributions is often incomplete, especially when species are cryptic, difficult to survey, or rare. The use of species distribution models has increased in recent years and proven a valuable tool to evaluate habitat suitability for species. However, practitioners have yet to fully adopt the potential of species distribution models to inform conservation efforts for information-limited species. Here, we describe a species distribution modeling approach for at-risk species that could better inform U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s species status assessments and help facilitate conservation decisions. We applied four modeling techniques (generalized additive, maximum entropy, generalized boosted, and weighted ensemble) to occurrence data for four at-risk species proposed for listing under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (Papaipema eryngii, Macbridea caroliniana, Scutellaria ocmulgee and Balduina atropurpurea) in the Southeastern U.S. The use of ensemble models reduced uncertainty caused by differences among modeling techniques, with a consequent improvement of predictive accuracy of fitted models. Incorporating an ensemble modeling approach into species status assessments and similar frameworks is likely to benefit survey efforts, inform recovery activities, and provide more robust status assessments for at-risk species. We emphasize that co-producing species distribution models in close collaboration with species experts has the potential to provide better calibration data and model refinements, which could ultimately improve reliance and use of model outputs.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Illoldi-Rangel ◽  
Chissa-Louise Rivaldi ◽  
Blake Sissel ◽  
Rebecca Trout Fryxell ◽  
Guadalupe Gordillo-Pérez ◽  
...  

Species distribution models were constructed for tenIxodesspecies andAmblyomma cajennensefor a region including Mexico and Texas. The model was based on a maximum entropy algorithm that used environmental layers to predict the relative probability of presence for each taxon. For Mexico, species geographic ranges were predicted by restricting the models to cells which have a higher probability than the lowest probability of the cells in which a presence record was located. There was spatial nonconcordance between the distributions ofAmblyomma cajennenseand theIxodesgroup with the former restricted to lowlands and mainly the eastern coast of Mexico and the latter to montane regions with lower temperature. The risk of Lyme disease is, therefore, mainly present in the highlands where someIxodesspecies are known vectors; ifAmblyomma cajennenseturns out to be a competent vector, the area of risk also extends to the lowlands and the east coast.


2014 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gentile Francesco Ficetola ◽  
Anna Bonardi ◽  
Paola Mairota ◽  
Vincenzo Leronni ◽  
Emilio Padoa-Schioppa

Abstract Crop damages by wildlife is a frequent form of human-wildlife conflict. Identifying areas where the risk of crop damages is highest is pivotal to set up preventive measures and reduce conflict. Species distribution models are routinely used to predict species distribution in response of environmental changes. The aim of this paper was assessing whether species distribution models can allow to identify the areas most at risk of crop damages, helping to set up management strategies aimed at the mitigation of human-wildlife conflicts. We obtained data on wild boar Sus scrofa damages to crops in the Alta Murgia National Park, Southern Italy, and related them to landscape features, to identify areas where the risk of wild boar damages is highest. We used MaxEnt to build species distribution models. We identified the spatial scale at which landscape mostly affects the distribution damages, and optimized the regularization parameter of models, through an information-theoretic approach based on AIC. Wild boar damages quickly increased in the period 2007-2011; cereals and legumes were the crops more affected. Large areas of the park have a high risk of wild boar damages. The risk of damages was related to low cover of urban areas or olive grows, intermediate values of forest cover, and high values of shrubland cover within a 2-km radius. Temporally independent validation data demonstrated that models can successfully predict damages in the future. Species distribution models can accurately identify the areas most at risk of wildlife damages, as models calibrated on data collected during only a subset of years correctly predicted damages in the subsequent year.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document