scholarly journals Parallel model-based and model-free reinforcement learning for card sorting performance

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Steinke ◽  
Florian Lange ◽  
Bruno Kopp
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Cognitive Flexibility ◽  
Theoretical Perspective ◽  
Behavioral Flexibility ◽  
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test ◽  
Card Sorting ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Model Free ◽  
Reinforcement Learning Models

Abstract The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) is considered a gold standard for the assessment of cognitive flexibility. On the WCST, repeating a sorting category following negative feedback is typically treated as indicating reduced cognitive flexibility. Therefore such responses are referred to as ‘perseveration’ errors. Recent research suggests that the propensity for perseveration errors is modulated by response demands: They occur less frequently when their commitment repeats the previously executed response. Here, we propose parallel reinforcement-learning models of card sorting performance, which assume that card sorting performance can be conceptualized as resulting from model-free reinforcement learning at the level of responses that occurs in parallel with model-based reinforcement learning at the categorical level. We compared parallel reinforcement-learning models with purely model-based reinforcement learning, and with the state-of-the-art attentional-updating model. We analyzed data from 375 participants who completed a computerized WCST. Parallel reinforcement-learning models showed best predictive accuracies for the majority of participants. Only parallel reinforcement-learning models accounted for the modulation of perseveration propensity by response demands. In conclusion, parallel reinforcement-learning models provide a new theoretical perspective on card sorting and it offers a suitable framework for discerning individual differences in latent processes that subserve behavioral flexibility.

scholarly journals L-DOPA Reduces Model-Free Control of Behavior by Attenuating the Transfer of Value to Action

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils B. Kroemer ◽  
Ying Lee ◽  
Shakoor Pooseh ◽  
Ben Eppinger ◽  
Thomas Goschke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Prediction Error ◽  
Behavioral Control ◽  
Decision Task ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Model Free ◽  
Markov Decision ◽  
Model Free Control ◽  
Reinforcement Learning Models ◽  
The Brain

AbstractDopamine is a key neurotransmitter in reinforcement learning and action control. Recent findings suggest that these components are inherently entangled. Here, we tested if increases in dopamine tone by administration of L-DOPA upregulate deliberative “model-based” control of behavior or reflexive “model-free” control as predicted by dual-control reinforcement-learning models. Alternatively, L-DOPA may impair learning as suggested by “value” or “thrift” theories of dopamine. To this end, we employed a two-stage Markov decision-task to investigate the effect of L-DOPA (randomized cross-over) on behavioral control while brain activation was measured using fMRI. L-DOPA led to attenuated model-free control of behavior as indicated by the reduced impact of reward on choice and increased stochasticity of model-free choices. Correspondingly, in the brain, L-DOPA decreased the effect of reward while prediction-error signals were unaffected. Taken together, our results suggest that L-DOPA reduces model-free control of behavior by attenuating the transfer of value to action.

Bayes factors for reinforcement-learning models of the Iowa gambling task.

Decision ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Steingroever ◽  
Ruud Wetzels ◽  
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Iowa Gambling Task ◽  
Bayes Factors ◽  
Gambling Task ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Reinforcement Learning Models

Model-Based and Model-Free Social Cognition

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leor M Hackel ◽  
Jeffrey Jordan Berg ◽  
Björn Lindström ◽  
David Amodio
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Social Cognition ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Memory Systems ◽  
Learning Task ◽  
Financial Advisors ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Model Free ◽  
Systems Model ◽  
Task Assessment

Do habits play a role in our social impressions? To investigate the contribution of habits to the formation of social attitudes, we examined the roles of model-free and model-based reinforcement learning in social interactions—computations linked in past work to habit and planning, respectively. Participants in this study learned about novel individuals in a sequential reinforcement learning paradigm, choosing financial advisors who led them to high- or low-paying stocks. Results indicated that participants relied on both model-based and model-free learning, such that each independently predicted choice during the learning task and self-reported liking in a post-task assessment. Specifically, participants liked advisors who could provide large future rewards as well as advisors who had provided them with large rewards in the past. Moreover, participants varied in their use of model-based and model-free learning strategies, and this individual difference influenced the way in which learning related to self-reported attitudes: among participants who relied more on model-free learning, model-free social learning related more to post-task attitudes. We discuss implications for attitudes, trait impressions, and social behavior, as well as the role of habits in a memory systems model of social cognition.

Proximal policy optimization with model-based methods

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Shuailong Li ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Huiwen Zhang ◽  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Yuquan Leng
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Transition Model ◽  
Practical Applications ◽  
Original Algorithm ◽  
Policy Performance ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Model Free ◽  
Future State ◽  
Policy Optimization

Model-free reinforcement learning methods have successfully been applied to practical applications such as decision-making problems in Atari games. However, these methods have inherent shortcomings, such as a high variance and low sample efficiency. To improve the policy performance and sample efficiency of model-free reinforcement learning, we propose proximal policy optimization with model-based methods (PPOMM), a fusion method of both model-based and model-free reinforcement learning. PPOMM not only considers the information of past experience but also the prediction information of the future state. PPOMM adds the information of the next state to the objective function of the proximal policy optimization (PPO) algorithm through a model-based method. This method uses two components to optimize the policy: the error of PPO and the error of model-based reinforcement learning. We use the latter to optimize a latent transition model and predict the information of the next state. For most games, this method outperforms the state-of-the-art PPO algorithm when we evaluate across 49 Atari games in the Arcade Learning Environment (ALE). The experimental results show that PPOMM performs better or the same as the original algorithm in 33 games.

scholarly journals Test-retest reliability of canonical reinforcement learning models

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Weidinger ◽  
Andrea Gradassi ◽  
Lucas Molleman ◽  
Wouter van den Bos
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Reinforcement Learning Models ◽  
Test Retest Reliability
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document