scholarly journals Diabetic macular edema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor under the reimbursement policy in Taiwan

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Chieh Hsieh ◽  
Chieh-Yin Cheng ◽  
Kun-Hsien Li ◽  
Chih-Chun Chuang ◽  
Jian-Sheng Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Panretinal Photocoagulation ◽  
Reimbursement Policy ◽  
Micropulse Laser ◽  
The Mean

AbstractThe purpose of this retrospective interventional case series is to compare the functional and anatomical outcomes in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) treated intravitreally with aflibercept or ranibizumab under the Taiwan National Insurance Bureau reimbursement policy. 84 eyes were collected and all eyes were imaged with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), color fundus photographs (CFPs), and fluorescein angiography (FA). At 24 months after therapy initiation, the logMAR BCVA improved from 0.58 ± 0.33 to 0.47 ± 0.38 (p < 0.01), the CRT decreased from 423.92 ± 135.84 to 316.36 ± 90.02 (p < 0.01), and the number of microaneurysms decreased from 142.14 ± 57.23 to 75.32 ± 43.86 (p < 0.01). The mean injection count was 11.74 ± 5.44. There was no intergroup difference in logMAR BCVA (p = 0.96), CRT (p = 0.69), or injection count (p = 0.81). However, the mean number of microaneurysms was marginally reduced (p = 0.06) in eyes treated with aflibercept at the end of the follow-up, and the incidence rates of supplementary panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) (p = 0.04) and subthreshold micropulse laser (SMPL) therapy sessions (p = 0.01) were also reduced. Multivariate analysis revealed that only initial logMAR BCVA influenced the final VA improvements (odds ratio (OR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 ~ 0.93, p < 0.01); in contrast, age (OR − 0.38, 95% CI − 6.97 ~ − 1.85, p < 0.01) and initial CRT (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 ~ 0.84, p < 0.01) both influenced the final CRT reduction at 24 months. To sum up, both aflibercept and ranibizumab are effective in managing DME with PDR in terms of VA, CRT and MA count. Eyes receiving aflibercept required less supplementary PRP and SMPL treatment than those receiving ranibizumab. The initial VA influenced the final VA improvements at 24 months, while age and initial CRT were prognostic predictors of 24-month CRT reduction.

scholarly journals Treatment of diabetic macular edema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents under the reimbursement policy of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Bureau: Aflibercept or ranibizumab?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Chieh Hsieh ◽  
Chieh-Yin Cheng ◽  
Kun-Hsien Li ◽  
Chih-Chun Chuang ◽  
Jian-Sheng Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Panretinal Photocoagulation ◽  
Reimbursement Policy ◽  
Micropulse Laser ◽  
The Mean

Abstract The purpose of this retrospective interventional case series is to compare the functional and anatomical outcomes in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) treated intravitreally with aflibercept or ranibizumab under the Taiwan National Insurance Bureau reimbursement policy. 84 eyes were collected and all eyes were imaged with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), color fundus photographs (CFPs), and fluorescein angiography (FA). At 24 months after therapy initiation, the logMAR BCVA improved from 0.58 ± 0.33 to 0.47 ± 0.38 (p < 0.01), the CRT decreased from 423.92 ± 135.84 to 316.36 ± 90.02 (p < 0.01), and the number of microaneurysms decreased from 142.14 ± 57.23 to 75.32 ± 43.86 (p < 0.01). The mean injection count was 11.59 ± 6.54. There was no intergroup difference in logMAR BCVA (p = 0.96), CRT (p = 0.69), or injection count (p = 0.81). However, the mean number of microaneurysms was marginally reduced (p = 0.06) in eyes treated with aflibercept at the end of the follow-up, and the incidence rates of supplementary panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) (p = 0.04) and subthreshold micropulse laser (SMPL) therapy sessions (p = 0.01) were also reduced. Multivariate analysis revealed that only initial logMAR BCVA influenced the final VA improvements (odds ratio (OR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 ~ 0.93, p < 0.01); in contrast, age (OR -0.38, 95% CI -6.97~-1.85, p < 0.01) and initial CRT (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 ~ 0.84, p < 0.01) both influenced the final CRT reduction at 24 months. To sum up, both aflibercept and ranibizumab are effective in managing DME with PDR in terms of VA, CRT and MA count. Eyes receiving aflibercept required less supplementary PRP and SMPL treatment than those receiving ranibizumab. The initial VA influenced the final VA improvements at 24 months, while age and initial CRT were prognostic predictors of 24-month CRT reduction.

scholarly journals Panretinal photocoagulation after or prior to intravitreal conbercept injection for diabetic macular edema: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Guiyang Zhao ◽  
Weijie Fan ◽  
Taihong Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Panretinal Photocoagulation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Photocoagulation Treatment ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Background Panretinal photocoagulation treatment (PRP) have been known as a standard treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (sNPDR). However, there is no consensus on when PRP should be administrated if anti-VEGF treatment is needed for the concurrent diabetic macular edema (DME). This study is to evaluate the difference between two groups of PRP prior to, or after intravitreal conbercept (IVC) for patients with PDR or sNPDR combined with DME. Methods This was a retrospective study. Fifty-eight eyes with DME secondary to PDR or sNPDR were divided into two groups; the PRP after (PRP-after group), or prior to (PRP-prior group), IVC. Changes in number of IVC injections, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) were compared after 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years from the first IVC injection. Results The mean number of injections in PRP-after group was 4.8 (1 year) and 6.4 (2 year), lower than 6.4 (1 year) and 8.5 (2 year) in PRP-prior group (both p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in change in BCVA and CSMT between two groups after each follow-up. Conclusion PRP after IVC requires less injections but also yields similar visual and anatomic outcome comparing with PRP prior to IVC in patients with diabetic retinopathy combined with DME.

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor in non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy with diabetic macular edema

2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212094480
Author(s):  
Yong Hyun Jun ◽  
Seong Taeck Kim
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Neurotrophic Factor ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Control Group ◽  
The Mean

Purpose: To investigate aqueous humor (AH) and serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: The prospective study consists of 20 patients with DME NPDR, 20 patients with no-DME NPDR, and 20 healthy control subjects. Serum and AH samples were obtained during cataract surgery and intravitreal injection. Serum and AH levels of BDNF were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: The mean serum levels of BDNF were lower in both NPDR groups compared to the control group (DME NPDR group, p = 0.015; no-DME NPDR group, p = 0.024). Furthermore, the mean serum level of BDNF was lower in the DME NPDR group compared to the no-DME NPDR group ( p = 0.041). The mean AH levels of BDNF were significantly reduced in both NPDR groups compared to the control group (DME NPDR group, p < 0.001; no-DME NPDR group, p = 0.006). Further, the mean AH level of BDNF was significantly lower in the DME NPDR group compared to the no-DME NPDR group ( p = 0.037). Conclusion: Serum and AH levels of BDNF were reduced in NPDR patients with DME than without DME.

scholarly journals The Effect of Chromium in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema: An Interventional Comparative Case Series

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Suresh K Karri ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Case Series Study ◽  
Series Study

Objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of chromium polynicotinate supplementation on the visual acuity and macular thickness of the diabetic macular edema in patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy through a prospective, interventional comparative case series study, was performed in 120 patients.

EFFECT OF INTRAVITREALANTI VEGF COMBINED WITH MACULAR LASER IN A CASE OF PROLIFERATIVE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY WITH CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT MACULAR EDEMA

2021 ◽  
pp. 3-3
Author(s):  
Prachi Mathur ◽  
Rakesh Porwal
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Combined Effect ◽  
Panretinal Photocoagulation ◽  
Working Adults ◽  
Clinically Significant Macular Edema ◽  
Clinically Significant

Diabetic retinopathy specically Diabetic macularedema is the leading cause of new cases of blindness in working adults. We here discuss a case of a 50 year old male diabetic with clinically signicant macular edema who received a dose of intravitreal antiVEGF followed by panretinal photocoagulation 3 weeks later and macular laser at the end of 3rd month. On various followups there was a serial decrease in macular thickness. This case emphasizes on the fact that combined effect of AntiVEGF therapy with laser therapy has a benecial role in Proliferative Diabetic retinopathy with Diabetic Macular Edema.

scholarly journals Treatment of cystoid macular edema in a patient with primary open angle glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy by withdrawal of travoprost

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-183
Author(s):  
Shiv Sagar N ◽  
BN Kalpana ◽  
Shilpa YD
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Cystoid Macular Edema ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Eye Drops ◽  
Antiglaucoma Medication ◽  
Micropulse Laser

To study the association of cystoid macular edema (CME) and Travoprost eye drops in a patient with diabetic retinopathy (DR).The study was carried out on a 65yr old patient on a regular follow up from 2009-2018.A 65yr old patient of a DR of both eyes who had received 3 sittings of pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP) laser in both eyes and grid laser to his right eye. He was on regular follow up since 2009 with a stable proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Patient was also on topical antiglaucoma medication and had prophylactic YAG-PI done both eyes. He was on regular follow up since 2009 with a stable proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Right eye showed macular edema (ME) in 2014 and underwent OCT and FFA. Patient refused for intravitreal injection and preferred laser treatment, so patient underwent micropulse laser treatment in 2014. His edema persisted even after micropulse treatment. His systemic control was good and patient continued to use Travoprost eye drops. So in 2017 suspected CME secondary to topical prostaglandin (PG) analogue as he had strict glycemic control and was no fluctuation in ME. Hence topical PG analogue was withdrawn and stopped. On subsequent follow up after 2 months CME had completely disappeared and the foveal contour returned to normal on OCT. LE was status quo. Patient was followed up for more than 1 year and continuously followed up, 15 days back in June 2018 had no evidence of CME and vision was 6/9 in both eyes.: Differentiation of DME and CME secondary to PG analogue should be made at the earliest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document