scholarly journals Retrospective study of combined splinting restorations in the aesthetic zone of periodontal patients

BDJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 220 (5) ◽  
pp. 241-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Liu ◽  
Y. Zhang ◽  
Z. Zhou ◽  
S. Ma
2007 ◽  
Vol 137 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marzia Salgarello ◽  
Carlo Gasperoni ◽  
Antonella Montagnese ◽  
Eugenio Farallo

OBJECTIVE: We present our experience with an otoplasty technique that combines “closed” anterior scoring using the Stenström otoabrader with mattress sutures to the posterior cartilage. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In a retrospective study, we report our experience with 135 patients operated on in the last 12 years. Some surgical principles make our procedure different from previous combination techniques: the posterior access incision is linear without skin excision; anterior scoring is performed along the entire antihelix and scapha, with care to score toward the concha at the tail of the antihelix to bring the ear lobe nearer to the mastoid; Mustarde's mattress sutures are used to stabilize the result. RESULTS: There were no major complications and few minor complications. The aesthetic results were graded as very good or good in 95% of the cases; the rest were graded as satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Our technique is versatile, gives pleasant, natural-looking results, and has a low complication rate. It is a simple, reliable, reproducible, and easily mastered method.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 413-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Moratin ◽  
Philipp-Sebastian Koch ◽  
Johannes Benecke ◽  
Azadeh Orouji ◽  
Corinne Bauer ◽  
...  

Objectives: It is uncertain whether dermal regeneration templates (DRTs) are helpful to reconstruct nasal defects. The aim of this study was to assess whether the aesthetic subunits determine the outcome. Methods: In this unicentric, retrospective study, the surgical procedures and outcomes of patients who received DRTs to reconstruct nasal defects were assessed and compared with the involved aesthetic subunits. Results: DRTs were used for reconstruction of 36 nasal defects in 35 patients with involvement of 76 aesthetic subunits: nasal sidewall (n = 21), nasal ala (n = 13), nasal tip/columella (n = 12, n = 1, respectively), nasal dorsum (n = 12), and extranasal aesthetic areas (n = 17). Fifty-eight nasal and 8 extranasal aesthetic subunits were reconstructed with DRTs, 10 subunits with a flap. Twenty-nine of 36 defects healed without any complications (80.5%). All reconstructed nasal tips/columella and the nasal dorsa healed without any complications. Region-specific complications were retraction of the ala rim (4/12; 33.3% of the patients with involvement of the nasal ala) and the formation of a fistula in the nasal sidewall (1/21; 4.8%). Region-specific complications of extranasal subunits were the development of an ectropium (2/3; 66.7% of the patients with involvement of the lower lid). Conclusions: DRTs can be helpful to reconstruct nasal defects. However, if the defect involves the aesthetic subunits nasal ala or the infraorbital region, different techniques should be preferred.


Author(s):  
Salvatore Poma ◽  
Domenico Michele Modica ◽  
Alessandro Pitruzzella ◽  
Alberto Fucarino ◽  
Gianfranco Mattina ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Robotic neck dissection surgery allows less invasiveness to significantly improve the aesthetic impact even though it does not compromise the principles of radical cancer procedure. Objective The aim of our work is to describe our personal experience with robotic neck dissection surgery. Methods A retrospective study was conducted by analyzing 10 patients subjected to a robotic neck dissection surgery. In the period from August 2012 to December 2018, these patients have been treated exclusively with robotic lateral-cervical dissection. Five of them were subjected to robotic-assisted transaxillary neck dissection (RATAND) and the other 5 treated with robotic-assisted retroauricular neck dissection (RARAND), then the surgical results have been compared with 5 similar dissections performed by open neck dissection (OND). Results The average surgical time of RATAND was estimated in 166 minutes, the average surgical time of RARAND was estimated in 153 minutes and the average surgical time of OND was estimated in 48 minutes. Both robotic techniques are valid from the oncological and aesthetic point of view, but in terms of surgical time, they are much longer than the open technique. Conclusions In terms of the post-operative decree, in our opinion, the retroauricular technique is more rapid for the purposes of recovery.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 338-338
Author(s):  
Alethea Li Yen Foong ◽  
Keson Beng Choon Tan ◽  
Khim Hean Teoh ◽  
Valerie Hwee Shinn Tey ◽  
Ken Tan

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (38) ◽  
pp. 51-55
Author(s):  
Mihai-Liviu Ciofu ◽  
Mihail Dan Cobzeanu ◽  
Otilia Boisteanu ◽  
Daniela Sulea ◽  
Razvan Giuvara ◽  
...  

AbstractBACKGROUND. Improving the aesthetic and functional outcomes of parotidectomy is a constant concern of recent studies. We describe our experience on this topic by employing techniques inspired from rhytidectomy.MATERIAL AND METHODS. We performed a retrospective study including patients that underwent parotidectomy through a facelift approach and we documented the details of the technique and the postoperative care and outcomes.RESULTS. A total of 247 patients with parotid gland tumors were operated using the facelift approach. A superficial or quasi-total parotidectomy was performed, followed by a superficial musculoaponeurotic system-plasty. The postoperative outcomes were favourable regarding both the appearance and function, with minimal complications. The advantages of the employed technique are discussed.CONCLUSION. It is possible to decrease the sequelae, simplify the postoperative care and improve the aesthetic outcome of parotidectomy cases by employing the facelift approach and the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) reconstruction of the post-parotidectomy defect.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 855.e3
Author(s):  
C. Cannarozzo ◽  
P. Kirch ◽  
L. Campoy ◽  
R. Gleed ◽  
M. Martin-Flores
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 249
Author(s):  
David Broome ◽  
Gauri Bhuchar ◽  
Ehsan Fayazzadeh ◽  
James Bena ◽  
Christian Nasr

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Ghasak Mahmood ◽  
Sylvia J. Shaw ◽  
Yaga Szlachick ◽  
Rod Atkins ◽  
Stefan Bughi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document