Recent developments in metal–metalloporphyrin frameworks

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (33) ◽  
pp. 14574-14583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyong Guo ◽  
Banglin Chen

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) based on porphyrin or metalloporphyrin components are of particular interest due to their potential applications in molecular sorption, light-harvesting, and heterogeneous catalysis.

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (14) ◽  
pp. 5238-5261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amarajothi Dhakshinamoorthy ◽  
Abdullah M. Asiri ◽  
Hermenegildo Garcia

This review illustrates the recent developments in heterogeneous catalysis using mixed metal or mixed linker MOFs.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
javier enriquez ◽  
Ignacio Chi-Duran ◽  
Carolina Manquian ◽  
Felipe Herrera ◽  
Ruben Fritz ◽  
...  

Non-centrosymmetric single-crystal metal-organic frameworks (MOF) are promising candidates for phase-matched nonlinear optical communication, but typical hydrothermal synthesis produces small crystals with relatively low transmittance and poor phase matching. We study the effect of the metal-to-ligand molar ratio and reaction pH on the hydro-thermal synthesis of the non-centrosymmetric Zn(3-ptz)<sub>2</sub> and Zn(OH)(3-ptz) MOFs with <i>in-situ </i>ligand formation. In acidic environments, we find that decreasing the amount of ligand below the stoichiometric molar ratio 1:2 also produces highly transparent single-crystal octahedrons of <b>Zn(3-ptz)<sub>2</sub></b>. In alkaline environments, we obtain long rod-like <b>Zn(OH)(3-ptz) </b>crystals whose length exceeds previous reports by up to four orders of magnitude. Potential applications of these results in the development of MOF-based nonlinear optical devices are discussed.


Author(s):  
Ayushi Singh ◽  
Ashish Kumar Singh ◽  
Jian-Qiang Liu ◽  
Abhinav Kumar

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) or coordination polymers (CPs) are regarded as new variety of materials that find potential applications in plethora of areas such as gas/small molecule absorption/separation, gas storage, membranes...


2009 ◽  
Vol 253 (23-24) ◽  
pp. 3042-3066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Kuppler ◽  
Daren J. Timmons ◽  
Qian-Rong Fang ◽  
Jian-Rong Li ◽  
Trevor A. Makal ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 1196-1231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minyoung Yoon ◽  
Renganathan Srirambalaji ◽  
Kimoon Kim

2019 ◽  
Vol 389 ◽  
pp. 161-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Hwa Lee ◽  
Sungeun Jeoung ◽  
Yongchul G. Chung ◽  
Hoi Ri Moon

Author(s):  
Ryuichi Murase ◽  
Bowen Ding ◽  
Qinyi Gu ◽  
Deanna M. D'Alessandro

Electroactive and conducting framework materials, encompassing coordination polymers and metal–organic frameworks, have captured the imagination of the scientific community owing to their highly designable nanoporous structures and their potential applications in electrochromic devices, electrocatalysts, porous conductors, batteries and solar energy harvesting systems, among many others. While they are now considered integral members of the broader field of inorganic materials, it is timely to reflect upon their strengths and challenges compared with ‘traditional’ solid-state materials such as minerals, pigments and zeolites. Indeed, the latter have been known since ancient times and have been prized for centuries in fields as diverse as art, archaeology and industrial catalysis. This opinion piece considers a brief historical perspective of traditional electroactive and conducting inorganic materials, with a view towards very recent experimental progress and new directions for future progress in the burgeoning area of coordination polymers and metal–organic frameworks. Overall, this article bears testament to the rich history of electroactive solids and looks at the challenges inspiring a new generation of scientists. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Mineralomimesis: natural and synthetic frameworks in science and technology’.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document