scholarly journals Toward clean suspended CVD graphene

RSC Advances ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (87) ◽  
pp. 83954-83962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Yulaev ◽  
Guangjun Cheng ◽  
Angela R. Hight Walker ◽  
Ivan V. Vlassiouk ◽  
Alline Myers ◽  
...  

Anthracene was proposed as a new easily evaporable sacrificial layer for a dry CVD graphene transfer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 1054-1063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingguang Chen ◽  
Robert C. Haddon ◽  
Ruoxue Yan ◽  
Elena Bekyarova

This review highlights recent developments in CVD graphene transfer methods from the perspective of mechanism, cleanness, quality, reliability, and cost.


2017 ◽  
Vol 311 ◽  
pp. 10-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila L.C. Rodriguez ◽  
Felipe Kessler ◽  
Nileshkumar Dubey ◽  
Vinicius Rosa ◽  
Guilhermino J.M. Fechine

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 11476-11479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilya A. Kostogrud ◽  
Evgeniy V. Boyko ◽  
Dmitry V. Smovzh

RSC Advances ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (76) ◽  
pp. 48333-48340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuxian Cai ◽  
Xingfang Liu ◽  
Jianan Huang ◽  
Zhonghua Liu

Facile utilization of polyethylene (PE) film as both the supporting material for graphene transfer from copper foil and the target substrate for flexible strain sensor preparation in a single route.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1700240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bum Jun Kim ◽  
Nilesh K. Shrivastava ◽  
Tuqeer Nasir ◽  
Kyoung Soon Choi ◽  
Jouhahn Lee ◽  
...  

Nanoscale ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (46) ◽  
pp. 21865-21870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuqeer Nasir ◽  
Bum Jun Kim ◽  
Kwan-Woo Kim ◽  
Sang Hoon Lee ◽  
Hyung Kyu Lim ◽  
...  

The fundamental issues related to the formation of mechanical cracks and the chemical residue during the transfer process of large-area CVD graphene by polymeric carrier-films are addressed in this work.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Yamaguchi ◽  
K. Hayashi ◽  
S. Sato ◽  
N. Yokoyama

2013 ◽  
Vol E96.C (5) ◽  
pp. 714-717
Author(s):  
Woo Young CHOI ◽  
Min Su HAN ◽  
Boram HAN ◽  
Dongsun SEO ◽  
Il Hwan CHO

Author(s):  
P. Perdu ◽  
G. Perez ◽  
M. Dupire ◽  
B. Benteo

Abstract To debug ASIC we likely use accurate tools such as an electron beam tester (Ebeam tester) and a Focused Ion Beam (FIB). Interactions between ions or electrons and the target device build charge up on its upper glassivation layer. This charge up could trigger several problems. With Ebeam testing, it sharply decreases voltage contrast during Image Fault Analysis and hide static voltage contrast. During ASIC reconfiguration with FIB, it could induce damages in the glassivation layer. Sample preparation is getting a key issue and we show how we can deal with it by optimizing carbon coating of the devices. Coating is done by an evaporator. For focused ion beam reconfiguration, we need a very thick coating. Otherwise the coating could be sputtered away due to imaging. This coating is use either to avoid charge-up on glassivated devices or as a sacrificial layer to avoid short circuits on unglassivated devices. For electron beam Testing, we need a very thin coating, we are now using an electrical characterization method with an insitu control system to obtain the right thin thickness. Carbon coating is a very cheap and useful method for sample preparation. It needs to be tuned according to the tool used.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document