scholarly journals Task- and Talker-Specific Gains in Auditory Training

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 862-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe Barcroft ◽  
Brent Spehar ◽  
Nancy Tye-Murray ◽  
Mitchell Sommers

Purpose This investigation focused on generalization of outcomes for auditory training by examining the effects of task and/or talker overlap between training and at test. Method Adults with hearing loss completed 12 hr of meaning-oriented auditory training and were placed in a group that trained on either multiple talkers or a single talker. A control group also completed 12 hr of training in American Sign Language. The experimental group’s training included a 4-choice discrimination task but not an open-set sentence test. The assessment phase included the same 4-choice discrimination task and an open-set sentence test, the Iowa Sentences Test (Tyler, Preece, & Tye-Murray, 1986). Results Improvement on 4-choice discrimination was observed in the experimental group as compared with the control group. Gains were (a) highest when the task and talker were the same between training and assessment; (b) second highest when the task was the same but the talker only partially so; and (c) third highest when task and talker were different. Conclusions The findings support applications of transfer-appropriate processing to auditory training and favor tailoring programs toward the specific needs of the individuals being trained for tasks, talkers, and perhaps, for stimuli, in addition to other factors.

1992 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda Schick ◽  
Mary Pat Moeller

AbstractIt has been suggested that manual sign systems designed to represent English are unlearnable because they are not natural languages. In order to examine this premise, the present study examines reading achievement and expressive English skills of 13 profoundly deaf students, aged 7;1 to 14;8, who were educated using only a manually coded English (MCE) sign system. Linguistic structures selected for analysis were designed to reflect unique characteristics of English, as well as those common to English and American Sign Language, and to obtain a broad picture of English skills. Results showed that the deaf students had expressive English skills comparable to a hearing control group for some features of English that reflected syntactic and lexical skills. They showed substantial deficits in inflectional morphological skills that were not predictive of the complexity of their language. The results reveal which aspects of MCE appear to be learnable and which appear problematic for deaf students.


Author(s):  
Sahar Zedan Zaien, Manssour Habbash

Deaf and hard of hearing students are at disadvantage in standard learning environment resultantly their academic performance is poor as compared to normal peers. The current study evaluated a newly designed English Language Enrichment Program with the help of American Sign Language as the medium of instruction at Community College of the University of Tabuk. In this quantitative experimental study 20 female deaf students were divided randomly, 10 in experimental and 10 in the control group. The Enrichment Program was administered to the students in the experimental group, however, no Enrichment Program was delivered to the control group. After the program, both groups took an assessment test to demonstrate the efficiency of ELEP. The results revealed that the academic performance of the experimental group significantly improved as compared to that of the control group. The current study provided a framework for future studies to design and implement Enrichment Programs to uplift the learning process among deaf and hard of hearing students.


2019 ◽  
pp. 167-180
Author(s):  
Michael Davidson

Using poems by Emily Dickinson and recent work in cultural and queer theory, this final chapter explores the fine line between “gain” and “loss” in disability studies. Using the author’s own experience of gradual hearing loss, the chapter argues that recent claims for the positive values of “deaf gain” through the use of American Sign Language have vaunted possibilities of cultural inclusiveness to the exclusion of affective realms of frustration, loss, and failure that are seldom acknowledged experiences of deaf and hard-of-hearing persons. While endorsing the general thrust of Deaf Gain and its implications for the larger context of disability, the chapter argues for a more critical understanding of loss in the politics of gain.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Leonard ◽  
N. Ferjan Ramirez ◽  
C. Torres ◽  
M. Hatrak ◽  
R. Mayberry ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Pertz ◽  
Missy Plegue ◽  
Kathleen Diehl ◽  
Philip Zazove ◽  
Michael McKee

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document