POSTER BOARD T46: PRE-EMPTIVE AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE TRAINING IN ANTICIPATION OF COMPLETE HEARING LOSS: A CASE REPORT

Author(s):  
Scott E. Johnson ◽  
Glorisel Villegas-Rodriquez ◽  
Ajendra Sohal ◽  
Lyn Weiss
2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Maria Lopez ◽  
Mario Cruz ◽  
Sydney Lazarus ◽  
Phyllis Webster ◽  
Elaine G. Jones ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 862-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe Barcroft ◽  
Brent Spehar ◽  
Nancy Tye-Murray ◽  
Mitchell Sommers

Purpose This investigation focused on generalization of outcomes for auditory training by examining the effects of task and/or talker overlap between training and at test. Method Adults with hearing loss completed 12 hr of meaning-oriented auditory training and were placed in a group that trained on either multiple talkers or a single talker. A control group also completed 12 hr of training in American Sign Language. The experimental group’s training included a 4-choice discrimination task but not an open-set sentence test. The assessment phase included the same 4-choice discrimination task and an open-set sentence test, the Iowa Sentences Test (Tyler, Preece, & Tye-Murray, 1986). Results Improvement on 4-choice discrimination was observed in the experimental group as compared with the control group. Gains were (a) highest when the task and talker were the same between training and assessment; (b) second highest when the task was the same but the talker only partially so; and (c) third highest when task and talker were different. Conclusions The findings support applications of transfer-appropriate processing to auditory training and favor tailoring programs toward the specific needs of the individuals being trained for tasks, talkers, and perhaps, for stimuli, in addition to other factors.


2019 ◽  
pp. 167-180
Author(s):  
Michael Davidson

Using poems by Emily Dickinson and recent work in cultural and queer theory, this final chapter explores the fine line between “gain” and “loss” in disability studies. Using the author’s own experience of gradual hearing loss, the chapter argues that recent claims for the positive values of “deaf gain” through the use of American Sign Language have vaunted possibilities of cultural inclusiveness to the exclusion of affective realms of frustration, loss, and failure that are seldom acknowledged experiences of deaf and hard-of-hearing persons. While endorsing the general thrust of Deaf Gain and its implications for the larger context of disability, the chapter argues for a more critical understanding of loss in the politics of gain.


2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Maria Lopez ◽  
Mario Cruz ◽  
Sydney Lazarus ◽  
Phyllis Webster ◽  
Elaine G. Jones ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Leonard ◽  
N. Ferjan Ramirez ◽  
C. Torres ◽  
M. Hatrak ◽  
R. Mayberry ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Pertz ◽  
Missy Plegue ◽  
Kathleen Diehl ◽  
Philip Zazove ◽  
Michael McKee

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document