scholarly journals Clinical Practice Patterns of Fitting Advanced Device Features in Children With Cochlear Implants

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Ursula M. Findlen ◽  
Jason Benedict ◽  
Smita Agrawal
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Clinical Practice Patterns ◽  
Directional Microphones ◽  
Common Clinical Practice ◽  
Noise Management

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify common clinical practice patterns for providing advanced noise management features in children with cochlear implants (CIs) and evaluate trends in consideration of clinician experience and comfort with CI manufacturer-specific technology. Method: A mixed-model survey including quantitative and qualitative questions regarding providing advanced noise management features in the pediatric CI population was collected electronically via research electronic data capture. Survey questions spanned approach/philosophy toward provision of features, age of provision, and demographics of respondents. Descriptive statistics were completed to define common clinical practice patterns and demographic information. Results: A total of 160 pediatric audiologists from 35 U.S. States and five Canadian provinces completed the survey. Most audiologists (73.8%) reported enabling automatic directional microphones, and a vast majority (91%) reported enabling advanced noise processing features such as automatic noise cancellers, wind noise cancellers, and impulse noise cancellers in recipients' main programs. Audiologists ranked features in terms of importance for a school-age child with the top three ranked as automatic noise reduction, automatic directional microphones, and concha-level microphones. Importance of child-specific factors varied depending upon the specific feature of interest. Conclusions: Variability exists among providers in enabling advanced noise management features for pediatric CI recipients. Multiple factors, including patient characteristics, provider characteristics, and limited evidence-based guidance, could account for much of the variation. Overall, there is a trend toward automaticity for noise management. Additional studies are warranted to provide the evidence base for confidently programming advanced features for children using CIs.

Overview of Current Approaches to Aural Rehabilitation for Adults With Cochlear Implants

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 1175-1187
Author(s):  
Rachel Glade ◽  
Erin Taylor ◽  
Deborah S. Culbertson ◽  
Christin Ray
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Aural Rehabilitation ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Clinical Models ◽  
Hearing Health

Purpose This clinical focus article provides an overview of clinical models currently being used for the provision of comprehensive aural rehabilitation (AR) for adults with cochlear implants (CIs) in the Unites States. Method Clinical AR models utilized by hearing health care providers from nine clinics across the United States were discussed with regard to interprofessional AR practice patterns in the adult CI population. The clinical models were presented in the context of existing knowledge and gaps in the literature. Future directions were proposed for optimizing the provision of AR for the adult CI patient population. Findings/Conclusions There is a general agreement that AR is an integral part of hearing health care for adults with CIs. While the provision of AR is feasible in different clinical practice settings, service delivery models are variable across hearing health care professionals and settings. AR may include interprofessional collaboration among surgeons, audiologists, and speech-language pathologists with varying roles based on the characteristics of a particular setting. Despite various existing barriers, the clinical practice patterns identified here provide a starting point toward a more standard approach to comprehensive AR for adults with CIs.

Clinical Practice Patterns Suggest Female Patients Prefer Female Endoscopists

2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (10) ◽  
pp. 3149-3150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Davis ◽  
Brandon Rieders ◽  
Marie L. Borum
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Clinical Practice Patterns ◽  
Female Patients

A 2017 SURVEY OF THE CLINICAL PRACTICE PATTERNS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RELAPSING GRAVES DISEASE

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shlomit Koren ◽  
Miriam Shteinshnaider ◽  
Karen Or ◽  
Dror Cantrell ◽  
Carlos A. Benbassat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Graves Disease ◽  
Clinical Practice Patterns

scholarly journals Clinical Practice Patterns of Hypertensive Disease in Pregnancy among Korean Obstetricians

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-229
Author(s):  
Tae Gyu Ahn ◽  
Yeon Hee Kim ◽  
Yun Sook Kim ◽  
Jae Eun Shin ◽  
Young-Lim Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Antihypertensive Drugs ◽  
Antihypertensive Agents ◽  
Delivery Method ◽  
Hypertensive Disease ◽  
Clinical Practice Patterns ◽  
Elevated Liver Enzymes ◽  
Prophylactic Aspirin

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical practice patterns of Korean obstetricians and gynecologists the diagnosis and management of hypertensive disease in pregnant women. Methods: From April 2015 to October 2015, questionnaire was distributed via email to obstetricians who were members of the Society for Maternal and Fetal Medicine. The survey consisted of 37 questions in 6 categories. Responses to the questions on the management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, from diagnosis to treatment, were evaluated. Results: A total of 93 obstetricians and gynecologists responded to the survey. High blood pressure was allocated the highest priority as an index mainly used when deciding to hospitalize patients with hypertensive disease during pregnancy, followed by pregnancy symptoms, proteinuria, and blood test results. Calcium channel blocker (CCB) for oral administration and hydralazine for injection were preferred as antihypertensive drugs mainly used to control severe hypertension. Regarding the delivery method for hypertensive disease during pregnancy, in cases of preeclampsia, 63% of the respondents chose the delivery method according to the cervical status, and in cases of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome and eclampsia, which increased in severity, 52% and 31% responded that the delivery method was determined according to the cervical status, respectively. In cases of mild preeclampsia, the 70% of respondents preferred 37–38 weeks of gestation for the delivery time. Regarding the use of aspirin in patient with hypertension during pregnancy, 52% of the respondents occasionally administered aspirin, and in patients with a history of hypertensive disease during pregnancy, only 43% were administered prophylactic aspirin. Conclusion: Domestic obstetricians regarded blood pressure as the most meaningful factor when treating women with hypertension during pregnancy and considered blood pressure control as important. The preferred antihypertensive agents were oral CCB and hydralazine injections, and the choice of delivery method was determined according to the condition of the cervix and severity of the disease. Even in women with high risk factors for preeclampsia, prophylactic aspirin was administered in as low as 50%, of patients, possibly may due to the absence of domestic guidelines for aspirin use during pregnancy. Korean guidelines for prophylactic aspirin administration during pregnancy is needed based on additional research on the efficacy of aspirin for domestic women in the future.

scholarly journals Clinical practice patterns in indirect peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy: outcome of a European survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (11) ◽  
pp. E1704-E1711
Author(s):  
Pauline M.C. Stassen ◽  
Pieter Jan F. de Jonge ◽  
George J.M. Webster ◽  
Mark Ellrichmann ◽  
Arno J. Dormann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Clinical Practice Patterns ◽  
European Survey ◽  
Standardized Protocol ◽  
Pancreatic Duct Stones

Abstract Background and aims Indirect peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy (IPOC) is a relatively new diagnostic and therapeutic tool for biliopancreatic diseases. This international survey aimed to evaluate clinical practice patterns in IPOC among endoscopists in Europe. Methods An online survey was developed comprising 66 questions on the use of IPOC. Questions were grouped into four domains. The survey was sent to 369 endoscopists who perform IPOC. Results 86 respondents (23.3 %) from 21 different countries across Europe completed the survey. The main indications for cholangioscopy were determination of biliary strictures (85 [98.8 %]) and removal of common bile duct or intrahepatic duct stones (79 [91.9 %]), accounting for an estimated use of 40 % (interquartile range [IQR] 25–50) and 40 % (IQR 30–60), respectively, of all cases undergoing cholangioscopy. Pancreatoscopy was mainly used for removal of pancreatic duct stones (68/76 [89.5 %]), accounting for an estimated use of 76.5 % (IQR 50–95) of all cases undergoing pancreatoscopy. Only 13/85 respondents (15.3 %) had an institutional standardized protocol for targeted cholangioscopy-guided biopsy sampling. IPOC with lithotripsy was used as first-line treatment in selected patients with bile duct stones or pancreatic stones by 24/79 (30.4 %) and 53/68 (77.9 %) respondents, respectively. Conclusions This first European survey on the clinical practice of IPOC demonstrated wide variation in experience, indications, and techniques. These results emphasize the need for prospective studies and development of an international consensus guideline to standardize the practice and quality of IPOC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document