Erratum

1941 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-48
Author(s):  
L. Gray Burdin

March 3, 1941. As an addendum to a recent article of mine in the “Journal” (“A Survey of Speech Defectives in the Indianapolis Primary Grades,” September, 1940) the assumption was present that the situation revealed was as of the publication date. Since the data was gathered for this survey (1937), the Indianapolis Public Schools have rightfully set about to correct this need. The present director of Speech Correction is Miss Esther Glaspey, a well-trained speech pathologist. Her progressive remedial speech program in the Indianapolis Public Schools has met with hearty approbation.

1937 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 447-450
Author(s):  
Dorothy M. Davis

1923 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 280-283
Author(s):  
Pauline B. Camp

2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-58
Author(s):  
James C. Jupp ◽  
Alisa Leckie ◽  
Nolan L. Cabrera ◽  
Jamie Utt

Background/Context With a rationale informed by the demographic imperative, the resegregation of public schools, and our positionalities as researchers, we understand both the high stakes and the complexity of capacitating White preservice and in-service teachers capable of anti-racist praxis and race-visible teaching and learning in public school classrooms. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study Deploying the framework of colorblind racism, we systematically reviewed race-evasive White teacher identity studies and answered the question: What can we learn from 25 years of research? Research Design In using the method called the synoptic text, we engaged electronic databases, with special emphasis on ERIC EBSCOhost. The simple and general search term “White teachers” conducted using year-by-year parameters provided the most systematic net for capturing relevant studies. In narrowing our focus, we developed the following criteria: (a) White teachers as central topic, (b) analytical emphases on colorblind racism, (c) publication in peer-reviewed journals, (d) use of qualitative and/or narrative research methodologies, and (e) publication date between 1990 and 2015. Data Collection and Analysis Our general search yielded 136 (N = 136) peer-reviewed empirical qualitative and/or narrative studies between 1990 and 2015, and after narrowing our criteria, we found 47 race-evasive White teacher identity studies (n = 47, 47/136) that we reviewed here. Each study in the document universe was abstracted by authors, added to a spreadsheet, and categorized by emergent themes. Findings/Results The following five themes emerged and developed over the last 25 years: (a) racialized silence and invisibility (9/47), (b) resistance and active reconstruction of White privilege (12/47), (c) whiteness in institutional and social contexts (8/47), (d) fertile paradoxes in new research (9/47), and (e) reflexive whiteness pedagogies (9/47). Conclusions/Recommendations We believe our literature review identifies the complex contours of White preservice and in-service teachers’ silence, resistance to, engagement in, and pedagogical grappling with racism, whiteness, and White privilege. The importance of pre-service and in-service teachers being able to engage, understand, and challenge these issues becomes critically important at our crossroads in the present, especially given the recent election that bolstered open and tacit White supremacists into power. If White teachers are to engage racism, whiteness, and White privilege, they must do so with as opposed to for their students, in a Freirean sense. If teaching for social justice is important, renewed interest and investment in White teacher identity studies and related whiteness pedagogies is key for the next 25 years.


1955 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold L. Luper ◽  
Stanley Ainsworth

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document