Syntactic Maturity of Spontaneous Speech and Elicited Imitations of Hearing-Impaired Children

1978 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 380-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann E. Geers ◽  
Jean S. Moog
Keyword(s):  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Normal Children ◽  
Spontaneous Language ◽  
Language Measures ◽  
One Year ◽  
Hearing Children ◽  
School For The Deaf ◽  
Impaired Children ◽  
Hearing Impaired Children

Two language measures, designed for normal-hearing children, were applied to a sample of 52 severely and profoundly hearing-impaired children between four and 15 years of age. The Developmental Sentence Analysis (Lee, 1974) was used to assess their spontaneous language and the Carrow Elicited Language Inventory (Car-row, 1974a) to assess imitated language. The correlation between scores on the two measures was similar to that found by Carrow (1974b) for normal children (r = .75). However, there was little relation between either measure and reading achievement in hearing-impaired children. A subsample of children retested one year later showed those who remained in a school for the deaf showed greater improvement in their ability to imitate while those who had been integrated into schools with normal-hearing children improved most in spontaneous language. Over half of the hearing-impaired subjects scored below normal hearing three-year-olds on both measures. Caution is advised, however, in applying these norms to hearing-impaired children. The spontaneous language of these children differed from that of younger hearing children who received similar overall scores in the normative sample. The hearing-impaired subjects tended to use more mature constructions but used fewer correct structures per utterance.

Intelligibility of Modified Speech for Young Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing

2002 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 1027-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalie M. Uchanski ◽  
Ann E. Geers ◽  
Athanassios Protopapas
Keyword(s):  
Speech Processing ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Processing Conditions ◽  
Impaired Hearing ◽  
Slowing Down ◽  
Listening In Noise ◽  
Hearing Children ◽  
Impaired Children ◽  
Hearing Impaired Children

Exposure to modified speech has been shown to benefit children with languagelearning impairments with respect to their language skills (M. M. Merzenich et al., 1998; P. Tallal et al., 1996). In the study by Tallal and colleagues, the speech modification consisted of both slowing down and amplifying fast, transitional elements of speech. In this study, we examined whether the benefits of modified speech could be extended to provide intelligibility improvements for children with severe-to-profound hearing impairment who wear sensory aids. In addition, the separate effects on intelligibility of slowing down and amplifying speech were evaluated. Two groups of listeners were employed: 8 severe-to-profoundly hearingimpaired children and 5 children with normal hearing. Four speech-processing conditions were tested: (1) natural, unprocessed speech; (2) envelope-amplified speech; (3) slowed speech; and (4) both slowed and envelope-amplified speech. For each condition, three types of speech materials were used: words in sentences, isolated words, and syllable contrasts. To degrade the performance of the normal-hearing children, all testing was completed with a noise background. Results from the hearing-impaired children showed that all varieties of modified speech yielded either equivalent or poorer intelligibility than unprocessed speech. For words in sentences and isolated words, the slowing-down of speech had no effect on intelligibility scores whereas envelope amplification, both alone and combined with slowing-down, yielded significantly lower scores. Intelligibility results from normal-hearing children listening in noise were somewhat similar to those from hearing-impaired children. For isolated words, the slowing-down of speech had no effect on intelligibility whereas envelope amplification degraded intelligibility. For both subject groups, speech processing had no statistically significant effect on syllable discrimination. In summary, without extensive exposure to the speech processing conditions, children with impaired hearing and children with normal hearing listening in noise received no intelligibility advantage from either slowed speech or envelope-amplified speech.

Hearing-Impaired Children’s Comprehension and Production of Syntax in Oral Language

1973 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucille McKinney Pressnell
Keyword(s):  
Oral Language ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Normal Children ◽  
Auditory Cues ◽  
Verb Constructions ◽  
Oral Language Skills ◽  
Hearing Children ◽  
Impaired Children ◽  
Hearing Impaired Children

The acquisition and development of syntax in oral language for 47 congenitally hearing-impaired children between the ages of five years and 13 years, three months, was compared with that of normal children. The Northwestern Syntax Screening Test was administered and a 50-sentence spontaneous-language sample was scored and analyzed. In addition to the significant differences found in the rate of acquisition of syntax in favor of the normal children, some differences were found in the sequential order of development for particular verb constructions. The investigator hypothesized that such differences were related to the teaching order in the classroom and to the degree of visual-auditory cues inherent in the language constructions for the hearing-impaired children. Information from the case histories was used in an attempt to identify the factors contributing to the development of syntax for the hearing-impaired subjects. Of the six factors considered, only chronologic age and severity of hearing impairment were identified as contributing factors for these subjects. However, those hearing-impaired children who have achieved good oral language skills would be attending schools with hearing children and, therefore, were not represented in this study.

scholarly journals Comparison between lip-reading ability in normal and hearing impaired children

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A M Saad ◽  
M A Hegazi ◽  
M S Khodeir
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Reading Ability ◽  
Sensory Modality ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Lip Reading ◽  
Hearing Children ◽  
Age Range ◽  
Impaired Children ◽  
Hearing Impaired Children

Abstract Background Lip-reading is considered an important skill which varies considerably among normal hearing and hearing impaired (HI) children. It helps HI children to perceive speech, acquire spoken language and acquire phonological awareness. Speech perception is considered to be a multisensory process that involves attention to auditory signals as well as visual articulatory movements. Integration of auditory and visual signals occurs naturally and automatically in normal individuals across all ages. Many researches suggested that normal hearing children use audition as the primary sensory modality for speech perception, whereas HI children use lip-reading cues as the primary sensory modality for speech perception. Aim of the Work The aim of this study is to compare the lip-reading ability between normal and HI children. Participants and methods This is a comparative descriptive case control study. It was applied on 60 hearing impaired children (cases) and 60 normal hearing children (controls) of the same age and gender. The age range was (3-8 years). The Egyptian Arabic Lip-reading Test was applied to all children. Results There was statistically significant difference between the total mean scores of the EALRT between normal and HI children. Conclusion The results of the study proved that normal children are better lip-readers than HI children of the matched age range.

The Relation Between Stimulus Context, Speech Audibility, and Perception for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Children

2000 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 902-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia G. Stelmachowicz ◽  
Brenda M. Hoover ◽  
Dawna E. Lewis ◽  
Reinier W. L. Kortekaas ◽  
Andrea L. Pittman
Keyword(s):  
Young Children ◽  
Logistic Function ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Stimulus Context ◽  
Percent Correct ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Hearing Children ◽  
Impaired Children ◽  
Hearing Impaired Children

In this study, the influence of stimulus context and audibility on sentence recognition was assessed in 60 normal-hearing children, 23 hearing-impaired children, and 20 normal-hearing adults. Performance-intensity (PI) functions were obtained for 60 semantically correct and 60 semantically anomalous sentences. For each participant, an audibility index (AI) was calculated at each presentation level, and a logistic function was fitted to rau-transformed percent-correct values to estimate the SPL and AI required to achieve 70% performance. For both types of sentences, there was a systematic age-related shift in the PI functions, suggesting that young children require a higher AI to achieve performance equivalent to that of adults. Improvement in performance with the addition of semantic context was statistically significant only for the normal-hearing 5-year-olds and adults. Data from the hearing-impaired children showed age-related trends that were similar to those of the normal-hearing children, with the majority of individual data falling within the 5th and 95th percentile of normal. The implications of these findings in terms of hearing-aid fitting strategies for young children are discussed.

Inflectional Morphemes in the Manual English of Young Hearing-Impaired Children and Their Mothers

1978 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 372-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen E. Crandall
Keyword(s):  
Sign Language ◽  
Good Predictor ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Syntactic Function ◽  
Inflectional Morphemes ◽  
Hearing Children ◽  
Impaired Children ◽  
Hearing Impaired Children

Spontaneous sign-language samples were collected in a controlled interactive situation from 20 young hearing-impaired children and their mothers. Inflectional morphemes in the samples were described by cher attributes and classified for syntactic function within utterances. Inflectional morpheme productivity did not increase significantly with age; mean manual English morphemes per utterance did increase with age. The first six inflectional morphemes used by the children studied were the same as those used by normal-hearing children. A good predictor of the child’s use of inflectional morphemes was the mother’s use of these morphemes.

Identifying Giftedness in the Hearing Impaired: the Effectiveness of Four Nomination Forms

1989 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn Yewchuk ◽  
Mary Ann Bibby ◽  
Barbara Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Grade Level ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Hearing Children ◽  
School For The Deaf ◽  
Impaired Children ◽  
Hearing Impaired Children

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of four nomination forms in identifying intellectually gifted, hearing-impaired children. All subjects in the study were between the ages of 5 and 20 years, had hearing losses greater than 70 decibels in the better ear, and were in attendance at the Alberta School for the Deaf. Group I consisted of students nominated as gifted by teachers; Group II, the comparison group, consisted of age-matched students who had not been nominated as gifted. The results demonstrated that 1) the nominated group (Group I) had a higher mean IQ percentile and a higher mean score on the nomination forms than Group II; 2) there was no relationship between IQ percentile and nomination form scores, and 3) all four nomination forms were significantly correlated for Group I, while three were correlated for Group II. Qualitative data gathered from teachers of the hearing-impaired indicated that perceived characteristics of giftedness in this population are essentially the same as those observed in hearing children except that gifted hearing children are likely to be working above grade level, whereas gifted hearing-impaired children are more apt to be working at grade level.

A Comparison of Persian Vowel Production in Hearing-Impaired Children Using a Cochlear Implant and Normal-Hearing Children

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 340-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narges Jafari ◽  
Michael Drinnan ◽  
Reyhane Mohamadi ◽  
Fariba Yadegari ◽  
Mandana Nourbakhsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Vowel Production ◽  
Hearing Children ◽  
Impaired Children ◽  
Hearing Impaired Children
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document