Angioimmunoblastic lymphadenopathy-type peripheral T-cell lymphoma with cutaneous infiltration: report of a case and its gene expression profile

Aim: To compare the outcomes of GDPT [gemcitabine (G), cisplatin (D), prednisone (P), thalidomide (T)] versus CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) in treating newly diagnosed PTCL (peripheral T-cell lymphoma). Methods: An open-label prospective clinical trial with 153 newly diagnosed PTCL patients conducted between January 2010 and December 2018 was designed. Patients were randomly assigned to the GDPT (77 cases) and CHOP (76 cases) groups. Patients in each group were further divided into four subgroups: PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS); anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (AITL), and other types subgroup, in accordance with pathological patterns. Based on expression of RRM1, TOP2A, TUBB3, and ERCC1, patients were divided into groups with high and low gene expression levels. Clinical characteristics, side effects, efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared. Results: There were no significant differences in the basic clinical features or side effects between the GDPT and CHOP groups. The overall response rate (ORR) of the GDPT group was better than that of the CHOP group (66.3% versus 50.0%, p = 0.042), as was the complete remission (CR) rate (42.9% versus 27.6%, p = 0.049). Patients in the GDPT group had a longer PFS and OS than the CHOP group. The 4-year PFS and OS rates in the GDPT group were both superior to those in the CHOP group (63.6% versus 53.0% for PFS, p = 0.035; 66.8% versus 53.6% for OS, p = 0.039). In the GDPT group, the difference in CR between the four subgroups was statistically significant ( p = 0.046). In the CHOP group, differences in both CR and ORR among the four subgroups were statistically significant ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). There were also statistically significant differences in CR between patients treated with CHOP and GDPT in the PTCL-NOS subgroup, AITL subgroup, and the other types subgroup ( p = 0.015; p = 0.003; p = 0.005, respectively). The data also showed a significant difference in OS among the four subgroups within the GDPT group ( p = 0.001). The OS of AITL was shorter than that of the other three subgroups. Four subgroups of CHOP showed a significant difference in PFS ( p = 0.019). There was no statistical association between responses and the gene expression levels of RRM1, ERCC1, TUBB3, and TOP2A. Conclusion: The GDPT group had better response rates and prolonged patient PFS and OS. As a promising new regimen, GDPT is expected to become the first-line therapy for PTCL. New agents should be applied to patients who do not achieve good responses with previous treatment, such as those diagnosed with angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma. Trial registration: This open randomized prospective clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01664975).

Download Full-text

The gene expression profile of nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma demonstrates a molecular link between angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and follicular helper T (TFH) cells

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2006-10-055145 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 109 (11) ◽

pp. 4952-4963 ◽

Cited By ~ 375

Author(s):

Laurence de Leval ◽

David S. Rickman ◽

Caroline Thielen ◽

Aurélien de Reynies ◽

Yen-Lin Huang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

T Cell ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

T Cell Lymphoma ◽

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽

Molecular Profile ◽

Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma ◽

Angioimmunoblastic T Cell Lymphoma ◽

Tfh Cells ◽

Follicular Helper

Abstract The molecular alterations underlying the pathogenesis of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma, unspecified (PTCL-u) are largely unknown. In order to characterize the ontogeny and molecular differences between both entities, a series of AITLs (n = 18) and PTCLs-u (n = 16) was analyzed using gene expression profiling. Unsupervised clustering correlated with the pathological classification and with CD30 expression in PTCL-u. The molecular profile of AITLs was characterized by a strong microenvironment imprint (overexpression of B-cell– and follicular dendritic cell–related genes, chemokines, and genes related to extracellular matrix and vascular biology), and overexpression of several genes characteristic of normal follicular helper T (TFH) cells (CXCL13, BCL6, PDCD1, CD40L, NFATC1). By gene set enrichment analysis, the AITL molecular signature was significantly enriched in published TFH-specific genes. The enrichment was higher for sorted AITL cells than for tissue samples. Overexpression of several TFH genes was validated by immunohistochemistry in AITLs. A few cases with molecular TFH-like features were identified among CD30− PTCLs-u. Our findings strongly support that TFH cells represent the normal counterpart of AITL, and suggest that the AITL spectrum may be wider than suspected, as a subset of CD30− PTCLs-u may derive from or be related to AITL.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of GDPT (gemcitabine, cisplatin, prednisone,thalidomide) versus CHOP in newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.8018 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 8018-8018

Author(s):

Ling Li ◽

Yuanyuan Sun ◽

Xin Li ◽

Lei Zhang ◽

Xinhua Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Clinical Trial ◽

T Cell ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

T Cell Lymphoma ◽

The Other ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Gene Expression Levels

8018 Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphoma(PTCL) is highly heterogeneous invasive NHL.There is no consensus standard treatment for it now. So outcomes of GDPT versus CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) in treating newly diagnosed PTCL were compared. Methods: An open-label prospective clinical trial with 153 newly diagnosed PTCL patients conducted between January 2010 and December 2018 was designed. Patients were randomly assigned to the GDPT group (77 cases) and CHOP group (76 cases). Patients in each group were further divided into four subgroups: PTCL-NOS, ALCL, AITL, and an other types, in accordance with pathological patterns. Based on expression of RRM1, TOP2A, TUBB3 and ERCC1, patients were divided into groups with high and low gene expression levels. Clinical characteristics, side effects, efficacy, PFS and OS were compared. Results: There were no significant differences in the basic clinical features or side effects between the GDPT and CHOP groups. The ORR of the GDPT group was better than that of the CHOP group (66.3%vs. 50.0%, P= 0.042), as was the CR rate (42.9% vs. 27.6%, P= 0.049). Patients in the GDPT group had a longer PFS and OS than the CHOP group. The 4-year PFS and OS rates in the GDPT group were both superior to those in the CHOP group (63.6% vs. 53.0% for PFS, P= 0.035; 66.8% vs. 53.6% for OS, P= 0.039).In the GDPT group, the difference in CR between the four subgroups was statistically significant (P = 0.046).In the CHOP group, differences in both CR and ORR among the four subgroups were statistically significant ( P= < 0.001 and P= 0.005, respectively).There were also statistically significant differences in CR between patients treated with CHOP and GDPT in the PTCL-NOS subgroup, AITL subgroup, and the other types subgroup( P= 0.015; P= 0.003; P= 0.005, respectively).The data also showed a significant difference in OS among the four subgroups within the GDPT group ( P= 0.001).The OS of AITL was shorter than that of the other three subgroups. Four subgroups of CHOP showed a significant difference in PFS ( P= 0.019). There was no statistical association between responses and the gene expression levels of RRM1, ERCC1, TUBB3 and TOP2A. Conclusions: The GDPT group had better response rates and prolonged the patients’ PFS and OS. As a promising new regimen, GDPT is expected to become the first-line therapy for PTCL. New agents should be applied to patients who do not achieve good responses with previous treatment, such as those diagnosed with angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma. Clinical trial information: NCT01664975 .

Download Full-text