Habitat associations of Atlantic herring in the Shetland area: influence of spatial scale and geographic segmentation

2001 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTOS D. Maravelias
2015 ◽  
Vol 73 (7) ◽  
pp. 1912-1924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara M. Turner ◽  
John P. Manderson ◽  
David E. Richardson ◽  
John J. Hoey ◽  
Jonathan A. Hare

Abstract Concern over the impacts of incidental catches of Alewife, Alosa pseudoharengus and Blueback Herring, A. aestivalis (collectively managed as ‘river herring’) in the commercial Atlantic Herring (Clupea harengus) and Atlantic Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) fisheries has resulted in the recent implementation of river herring incidental catch limits. These incidental catches are highly variable in frequency and magnitude, and the environmental conditions associated with these catches are poorly understood. We used generalized additive models (GAMs) to describe habitat associations of Alewife, Blueback Herring, Atlantic Herring, and Atlantic Mackerel. Bottom temperature, bottom depth, bottom salinity, solar azimuth and elevation, and region of the Northeast U.S. continental shelf were all significant in the habitat models; GAMs explained 25.2, 16.9, 18.9, and 20.6% of the deviance observed for the presence/absence of Alewife, Blueback Herring, Atlantic Herring, and Atlantic Mackerel. A subset of the data was omitted from the model and the probability of presence was compared with observations; 66–77% of observations were correctly predicted. The individual probabilities of presence were used to quantify and evaluate the accuracy of modelled overlap of Alewife and Blueback Herring with Atlantic Herring (68–72% correct predictions) and Alewife and Blueback Herring with Atlantic Mackerel (57–69% correct predictions). Our findings indicate that environmental gradients influence the distributions and overlap of Alewife, Blueback Herring, Atlantic Herring, and Atlantic Mackerel, and with further testing and refinement these models could be developed into a tool to aid industry in reducing incidental catches of river herring.


The Condor ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua J. Lawler ◽  
Thomas C. Edwards

Abstract The recognition of the importance of spatial scale in ecology has led many researchers to take multiscale approaches to studying habitat associations. However, few of the studies that investigate habitat associations at multiple spatial scales have considered the potential effects of cross-scale correlations in measured habitat variables. When cross-scale correlations in such studies are strong, conclusions drawn about the relative strength of habitat associations at different spatial scales may be inaccurate. Here we adapt and demonstrate an analytical technique based on variance decomposition for quantifying the influence of cross-scale correlations on multiscale habitat associations. We used the technique to quantify the variation in nest-site locations of Red-naped Sapsuckers (Sphyrapicus nuchalis) and Northern Flickers (Colaptes auratus) associated with habitat descriptors at three spatial scales. We demonstrate how the method can be used to identify components of variation that are associated only with factors at a single spatial scale as well as shared components of variation that represent cross-scale correlations. Despite the fact that no explanatory variables in our models were highly correlated (r < 0.60), we found that shared components of variation reflecting cross-scale correlations accounted for roughly half of the deviance explained by the models. These results highlight the importance of both conducting habitat analyses at multiple spatial scales and of quantifying the effects of cross-scale correlations in such analyses. Given the limits of conventional analytical techniques, we recommend alternative methods, such as the variance-decomposition technique demonstrated here, for analyzing habitat associations at multiple spatial scales.


2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (12) ◽  
pp. 2095-2111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sapna Sharma ◽  
Pierre Legendre ◽  
Daniel Boisclair ◽  
Stéphane Gauthier

The choice of spatial scale and modelling technique used to capture species–habitat relationships needs to be considered when ascertaining environmental determinants of habitat quality for species and communities. Fish densities and environmental data were collected at three Laurentian lakes using underwater surveys by four snorkelers collecting fine spatial data acquired through geographic positioning systems. At both fine (20 m) and broad (100 m) spatial scales, tree-based approaches, which incorporated both linear and nonlinear relationships, explained more variation than their linear counterparts. At the finest spatial scale considered (20 m), local environmental conditions, such as habitat structure and heterogeneity, were important determinants of fish habitat selection. At the broadest spatial scale considered (100 m), fish tended to select habitat based on both local environmental features and riparian development. Moran’s eigenvector maps further revealed that fish–habitat associations were operating at broader spatial scales than the predefined analytical units, which can be partially attributed to the spatial structure of environmental conditions acting at spatial scales greater than 100 m. This study highlights the importance of evaluating statistical approaches at different spatial scales to identify key determinants of habitat quality for species, ultimately to assess the effects of perturbations on ecosystems.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hemanta Kafley ◽  
Matthew E. Gompper ◽  
Mandira Sharma ◽  
Babu R. Lamichane ◽  
Rupak Maharjan

Context Source populations of many large carnivores such as tigers (Panthera tigris) are confined within small wildlife refuges in human-dominated landscapes. Appropriate management of these populations may warrant understanding fine-scale use of habitat. Aims The aim of the present study is to understand the fine spatial-scale habitat associations of tigers in Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Methods We conducted camera-trap surveys across the park and applied an occupancy modelling approach to assess the probability of tiger detection and occurrence as a function of fine-scale habitat covariates. Results Tiger detection probability as a function of fine-scale habitat covariates was ≤0.20 compared with that of a constant detection model. Detectability patterns were best explained by models incorporating the effect of prey, slope and landcover type. Similarly, the best occupancy model incorporating the detection probability included prey, landcover type, water and slope. Tiger occurrence patterns were positively associated with prey availability and certain landcover types such as grasslands. Contrary to expectation, occurrence probability decreased further from human settlements. However, as expected, the occurrence of tigers was higher in proximity to water sources. Conclusions Both tiger detection and occurrence are influenced by fine-scale habitat factors, including prey availability. In small protected areas, individuals may persist at high population densities by intensively focusing their activity on small portions of their home ranges. Implications Our study provided insight into the fine spatial-scale occurrence probability of tigers, and thereby aids in developing appropriate habitat management strategies at the protected-area level. Our approach is broadly applicable to the robust assessment of fine-scale wildlife–habitat associations of many wide-ranging species that are ecologically ‘confined’ in smaller protected areas.


1985 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan T. Bagley

AbstractThe genus Klebsiella is seemingly ubiquitous in terms of its habitat associations. Klebsiella is a common opportunistic pathogen for humans and other animals, as well as being resident or transient flora (particularly in the gastrointestinal tract). Other habitats include sewage, drinking water, soils, surface waters, industrial effluents, and vegetation. Until recently, almost all these Klebsiella have been identified as one species, ie, K. pneumoniae. However, phenotypic and genotypic studies have shown that “K. pneumoniae” actually consists of at least four species, all with distinct characteristics and habitats. General habitat associations of Klebsiella species are as follows: K. pneumoniae—humans, animals, sewage, and polluted waters and soils; K. oxytoca—frequent association with most habitats; K. terrigena— unpolluted surface waters and soils, drinking water, and vegetation; K. planticola—sewage, polluted surface waters, soils, and vegetation; and K. ozaenae/K. rhinoscleromatis—infrequently detected (primarily with humans).


Author(s):  
PA Peres ◽  
AP Ferreira ◽  
GBO Machado ◽  
M Azevedo-Silva ◽  
SGL Siqueira ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document