scholarly journals The adjustment of reproductive threshold to prey abundance in a capital breeder

1999 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 571-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Madsen ◽  
Richard Shine
Author(s):  
Jorge Tobajas ◽  
Carlos Rouco ◽  
Javier Fernandez-de-Simon ◽  
Francisco Díaz-Ruiz ◽  
Francisca Castro ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlene Bissett ◽  
Ric T. F. Bernard ◽  
Daniel M. Parker

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 198-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-François Pélisson ◽  
Marie-Claude Bel-Venner ◽  
Benjamin Rey ◽  
Lorraine Burgevin ◽  
François Martineau ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 101 (14) ◽  
pp. 4854-4858 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. U. Karanth ◽  
J. D. Nichols ◽  
N. S. Kumar ◽  
W. A. Link ◽  
J. E. Hines
Keyword(s):  

Oikos ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 188-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beata Ujvari ◽  
Stefan Andersson ◽  
Gregory Brown ◽  
Richard Shine ◽  
Thomas Madsen

The Condor ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 814-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell D. Dawson ◽  
Gary R. Bortolotti

Abstract We investigated how natural variation in abundance and availability of the main prey of American Kestrels (Falco sparverius), small mammals, influenced provisioning rates by parents, and offspring size and survival. Provisioning behavior of kestrels was not constrained by the abundance of food in the environment; however, the availability of food, mediated through variation in weather, appeared to significantly influence parental provisioning behavior. Moreover, variation in weather had clear effects on reproductive success because nestlings exposed to inclement weather were smaller and lighter at fledging, and less likely to survive to fledging, compared to nestlings raised during good weather conditions. Prey abundance was not related to offspring size or survival. Our results suggest American Kestrels are limited by the availability, as opposed to abundance, of food on territories. It is likely that during our study, prey abundance was above some minimum threshold necessary to support successful reproduction, and so variation in weather affected reproduction more than variation in prey abundance.


The Condor ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly J Spiller ◽  
Randy Dettmers

Abstract Aerial insectivores (birds that forage on aerial insects) have experienced significant population declines in North America. Numerous hypotheses have been proposed for these declines, but current evidence suggests multiple factors could be operating in combination during their annual migratory cycles between breeding and nonbreeding areas. Potential drivers include decreased prey abundance, direct or indirect impacts of environmental contaminants, habitat loss, phenological changes due to warming climate, and conditions on migratory stopover or wintering grounds. While no single threat appears to be the cause of aerial insectivore declines, existing evidence suggests that several of these factors could be contributing to the declines at different times in the annual lifecycle. Breeding productivity for most of these species does not appear to be limited by overall prey abundance, contaminants, or habitat loss, which suggests that similar issues on nonbreeding grounds or carryover effects could play important roles. However, a better understanding of the importance of prey quality throughout the lifecycle is critically needed. Based on current evidence, we propose that changes in availability of high-quality prey, with variability across breeding and nonbreeding grounds, reduce various combinations of fledging success, post-fledging survival, and nonbreeding season body condition of aerial insectivores, resulting in species and geographic differences in population trends. We encourage others to use this hypothesis as a starting point to test specific mechanisms by which availability of high-quality prey influences demographic parameters. We suggest that future research focus on defining prey quality, monitoring insect abundance in conjunction with birds, comparing demographic models across local populations experiencing different population growth rates, and using tracking technology to document important migratory and nonbreeding areas. Considerable research progress already has been made, but additional research is needed to better understand the complex web of potential causes driving aerial insectivore declines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document