Quality of Life Across the Continuum of Breast Cancer Care

2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 324-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia A. Ganz
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susann Plate ◽  
Louise Emilsson ◽  
Martin Söderberg ◽  
Yvonne Brandberg ◽  
Fredrik Wärnberg

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-64
Author(s):  
Alexandr B. Shmerkevich ◽  
Irina L. Krom ◽  
Marina V. Erugina ◽  
Diana D. Balakina

Because of the optimization of the clinical and social prognosis of patients with cancer in recent decades, the possibility of incorporating rehabilitation in the continuum of cancer care is considered. Therefore, this study presents a comparative analysis of the quality of life among 427 working-age respondents with breast cancer in disease situations using the WHO QOL 100 questionnaire. Based on the results, a statistically significant decrease in the quality of life among the respondents in the physical and the level of independence spheres in the non-terminal situation of the disease was found, whereas in the group of incurable patients, a statistically significant decrease in the quality of life among the respondents in the physical, psychological, and level of independence spheres was found. Through the findings of this study, the rehabilitation of cancer patients in disease situations can be personified, and recommendations for improving the continuum of cancer care can be developed.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackie Bonilla ◽  
Cristian Escalera ◽  
Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson ◽  
Cathy Samayoa ◽  
Carmen Ortiz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Compared to their white counterparts, Latina breast cancer survivors experience poorer quality of care and worse health-related quality of life. Limited English proficiency (LEP) and patient engagement in cancer care could help explain these disparities. We assessed associations of LEP status and difficulty engaging with physicians with self-reported quality of breast cancer care and health-related quality of life among rural and urban Latina breast cancer survivors. Methods: Analyses used cross-sectional baseline survey data from two studies that tested a stress management program among rural and urban Latina breast cancer survivors in California. Medical information was collected through medical records review. Linear regression models examined bivariate and multivariate associations of LEP status (yes or no), difficulty engaging with doctors (asking questions and participating in treatment decisions) (1-4; higher score=greater difficulty), and rural versus urban site, on quality of breast cancer care and information and on physical and emotional well-being (health-related quality of life), controlling for demographic and medical factors. Results: The total sample included 304 women (151 from urban and 153 from rural sites). Mean age was 52.7 years (SD 10.9). Most were limited English proficient (84.5%) and had less than a high school education (67.8%). Difficulty engaging with doctors was inversely associated with patient ratings of quality of breast cancer care and information (B = - 0.190, p=0.014), emotional well-being (B = -1.866, p <0.0001), and physical well-being (B = -1.272, p = 0.002), controlling for demographic and treatment factors. Having LEP (vs. not; B = 1.987, p = 0.040) was independently associated with physical well-being only. Rural/urban status was not related independently to any outcome.Conclusions: Rural and urban Latina breast cancer survivors who report greater difficulty engaging with physicians experienced worse quality of breast cancer care and health-related quality of life. Promoting greater engagement of Latina breast cancer survivors in cancer care and providing medical interpreters when needed could improve patient outcomes among this vulnerable group.


2007 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 1257-1264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mascha de Kok ◽  
Rachel W. Scholte ◽  
Herman J. Sixma ◽  
Trudy van der Weijden ◽  
Karin F. Spijkers ◽  
...  

Medical Care ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 759-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt ◽  
Arnold L. Potosky

2004 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
G.L Beets ◽  
C.N.A Frotscher ◽  
C.D Dirksen ◽  
M.H Hebly ◽  
M.F von Meyenfeldt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document