Effectiveness of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program in Reducing Gastric Cancer Mortality

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (6) ◽  
pp. 1319-1328.e7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Kwan Jun ◽  
Kui Son Choi ◽  
Hoo-Yeon Lee ◽  
Mina Suh ◽  
Boyoung Park ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Sook Lee ◽  
Dong Kwan Oh ◽  
Mi Ah Han ◽  
Hoo-Yeon Lee ◽  
Jae Kwan Jun ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Kim ◽  
W. Cheon ◽  
J. Kim ◽  
J. Park ◽  
S. Kim

13 Background: Gastric Cancer is a major cause of death and a substantial socioeconomic burden in Korea. The National Cancer Screening Program for Medicaid recipients was initiated in 1999 and has contributed to reduction of cancer-related mortality in Korea. Endoscopy may be cost-effective screening tool in Korea, where the cost of endoscopy and UGIS are similar and the gastric cancer incidence is high. Most of Japanese studies on the efficiency of mass screening for gastric cancer have dealt with photoflurography as a screening tool. Although biennial gastric cancer screening by endoscopy has been increasing in Korea as part of the National Cancer Screening Program, few studies have evaluated its efficiency. Therefore, we analyzed the outcomes and efficiency of the National Cancer Screening Program for gastric cancer using endoscopy in Korea. Methods: We reviewed results from the National Cancer Screening Program for gastric cancer at Chung-Ang University Yongsan Hospital in Korea from March 2003 to March 2008. The study population was comprised of Medicaid recipients ≥ 40 years of age who were taken from the National Health Insurance Corporation. Results: A total of 7,278 asymptomatic subjects underwent endoscopy for gastric cancer screening. The mean age of the screened subjects was 51.3 years for men and 48.9 years for women. The male to female ratio of the screened subjects was 1.2:1. Gastric cancer was diagnosed in 32 (0.44%) of 7,278 subjects (22 men and 10 women). Their mean age was 54.4 years. Of these, 21 subjects (0.29%) were diagnosed as early gastric cancer and 11 subjects (0.15%) were advanced gastric cancer. The proportion of EGCs among total gastric cancers was 65.6%. The compliance with this program was low (59% for men and 49% for women). Conclusions: Despite accomplishments of the National Cancer Screening Program for gastric cancer in Korea, its effectiveness remains an issue. Efficiency and cost-effectiveness analysis will be needed for successful progression. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solveig Hofvind ◽  
Marta Román ◽  
Sofie Sebuødegård ◽  
Ragnhild S Falk

Objective To compute a ratio between the estimated numbers of lives saved from breast cancer death and the number of women diagnosed with a breast cancer that never would have been diagnosed during the woman’s lifetime had she not attended screening (epidemiologic over-diagnosis) in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Methods The Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program invites women aged 50–69 to biennial mammographic screening. Results from published studies using individual level data from the programme for estimating breast cancer mortality and epidemiologic over-diagnosis comprised the basis for the ratio. The mortality reduction varied from 36.8% to 43% among screened women, while estimates on epidemiologic over-diagnosis ranged from 7% to 19.6%. We computed the average estimates for both values. The benefit–detriment ratio, number of lives saved, and number of women over-diagnosed were computed for different scenarios of reduction in breast cancer mortality and epidemiologic over-diagnosis. Results For every 10,000 biennially screened women, followed until age 79, we estimated that 53–61 (average 57) women were saved from breast cancer death, and 45–126 (average 82) were over-diagnosed. The benefit–detriment ratio using average estimates was 1:1.4, indicating that the programme saved about one life per 1–2 women with epidemiologic over-diagnosis. Conclusion The benefit–detriment ratio estimates of the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program, expressed as lives saved from breast cancer death and epidemiologic over-diagnosis, should be interpreted with care due to substantial uncertainties in the estimates, and the differences in the scale of values of the events compared.


2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariona Pons-Vigués ◽  
Rosa Puigpinós ◽  
Gemma Cano-Serral ◽  
Marc Marí-Dell’Olmo ◽  
Carme Borrell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document