scholarly journals CME Exam 2: Effects of Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening on Cancer Incidence and Mortality in a Large Community-Based Population

2018 ◽  
Vol 155 (5) ◽  
pp. e21
2018 ◽  
Vol 155 (5) ◽  
pp. 1383-1391.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore R. Levin ◽  
Douglas A. Corley ◽  
Christopher D. Jensen ◽  
Joanne E. Schottinger ◽  
Virginia P. Quinn ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S73-S74
Author(s):  
Yi-Chia Lee ◽  
ChenYang Hsu ◽  
Tsung-Hsien Chiang ◽  
Chu-kuang Chou ◽  
Han-Mo Chiu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 124 (9) ◽  
pp. 1516-1523
Author(s):  
Lindy M. Kregting ◽  
Sylvia Kaljouw ◽  
Lucie de Jonge ◽  
Erik E. L. Jansen ◽  
Elleke F. P. Peterse ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Many breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening programmes were disrupted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to estimate the effects of five restart strategies after the disruption on required screening capacity and cancer burden. Methods Microsimulation models simulated five restart strategies for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. The models estimated required screening capacity, cancer incidence, and cancer-specific mortality after a disruption of 6 months. The restart strategies varied in whether screens were caught up or not and, if so, immediately or delayed, and whether the upper age limit was increased. Results The disruption in screening programmes without catch-up of missed screens led to an increase of 2.0, 0.3, and 2.5 cancer deaths per 100 000 individuals in 10 years in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Immediately catching-up missed screens minimised the impact of the disruption but required a surge in screening capacity. Delaying screening, but still offering all screening rounds gave the best balance between required capacity, incidence, and mortality. Conclusions Strategies with the smallest loss in health effects were also the most burdensome for the screening organisations. Which strategy is preferred depends on the organisation and available capacity in a country.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 656-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Navkiran K. Shokar ◽  
Theresa Byrd ◽  
David R. Lairson ◽  
Rebekah Salaiz ◽  
Junghyun Kim ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 332-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.S.T. Ng ◽  
C.H. Tan ◽  
D.C.L. Teo ◽  
C.Y.E. Seah ◽  
K.H. Phua

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 58-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice V. Bowie ◽  
Barbara A. Curbow ◽  
Mary A. Garza ◽  
Erin K. Dreyling ◽  
Lisa A. Benz Scott ◽  
...  

Although cancer-screening guidelines recommend periodic testing for women 50 years of age and older, these tests are underused. A search of databases identified 156 community-based breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening intervention studies published before April 2003. Most were conducted in the United States. More than half used randomization procedures or pre-post measures, and one third used both. Most reported significant intervention effects. Cervical and combined cervical and breast studies had higher rates of pre-post designs, and breast studies had the highest percentage using randomization. Although effective community-based breast and cervical interventions have been conducted, there is an urgent need for amplification of colorectal cancer screening.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document