scholarly journals Low cardiac output syndrome after adult cardiac surgery: predictive value of peak systolic global longitudinal strain

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S71
Author(s):  
Philippe Amabili ◽  
I Noirot ◽  
L Roediger ◽  
M Senard ◽  
B Hubert ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 1476-1483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Amabili ◽  
Sabeha Benbouchta ◽  
Laurence Roediger ◽  
Marc Senard ◽  
Marie Bernard Hubert ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
G.G. Khubulava ◽  
A.B. Naumov ◽  
S.P. Marchenko ◽  
O.Yu. Chupaeva ◽  
A.A. Seliverstova ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Alves Franco ◽  
Juliano Pinheiro de Almeida ◽  
Giovanni Landoni ◽  
Thomas W. L. Scheeren ◽  
Filomena Regina Barbosa Gomes Galas ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The detrimental effects of inotropes are well-known, and in many fields they are only used within a goal-directed therapy approach. Nevertheless, standard management in many centers includes administering inotropes to all patients undergoing cardiac surgery to prevent low cardiac output syndrome and its implications. Randomized evidence in favor of a patient-tailored, inotrope-sparing approach is still lacking. We designed a randomized controlled noninferiority trial in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with normal ejection fraction to assess whether an dobutamine-sparing strategy (in which the use of dobutamine was guided by hemodynamic evidence of low cardiac output associated with signs of inadequate tissue perfusion) was noninferior to an inotrope-to-all strategy (in which all patients received dobutamine). Results A total of 160 patients were randomized to the dobutamine-sparing strategy (80 patients) or to the dobutamine-to-all approach (80 patients). The primary composite endpoint of 30-day mortality or occurrence of major cardiovascular complications (arrhythmias, acute myocardial infarction, low cardiac output syndrome and stroke or transient ischemic attack) occurred in 25/80 (31%) patients of the dobutamine-sparing group (p = 0.74) and 27/80 (34%) of the dobutamine-to-all group. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the incidence of acute kidney injury, prolonged mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit or hospital length of stay. Discussion Although it is common practice in many centers to administer inotropes to all patients undergoing cardiac surgery, a dobutamine-sparing strategy did not result in an increase of mortality or occurrence of major cardiovascular events when compared to a dobutamine-to-all strategy. Further research is needed to assess if reducing the administration of inotropes can improve outcomes in cardiac surgery. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02361801. Registered Feb 2nd, 2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02361801


2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. A49
Author(s):  
Heather Dickerson ◽  
Antonio R Mott ◽  
Jack F Price ◽  
Anthony C Chang ◽  
Pertti K Suominen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Wolf Benjamin Kratzert ◽  
Eva Katherine Boyd

This chapter addresses underlying physiology, diagnostics, and management of common cardiovascular abnormalities in the patient after cardiac surgery. The goal is to provide insights into daily management, areas of controversy, and future directions in the field. After reviewing basic physiologic principles of cardiac output and circulation; problems affecting the postoperative hemodynamic state will be addressed individually. Specific topics include the low cardiac output syndrome, right ventricular failure, myocardial ischemia, diastolic dysfunction, vasodilatory syndrome, rhythm disturbances, pericardial tamponade, and cardiac arrest. Patients with postoperative open chests, or after orthotopic heart transplantation are also discussed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Brockmeyer ◽  
Y Lin ◽  
A Karathanos ◽  
C Parco ◽  
T Krieger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and purpose Previous studies and meta-analyses of perioperative levosimendan to improve the outcomes of patients with low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) undergoing cardiac surgery have given controversial results and the optimal time of infusion of levosimendan remains uncertain. We thus aimed to elucidate the risk/benefit ratio of preoperative levosimendan in a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods Online databases were searched for RCTs comparing preoperative levosimendan to placebo in patients with LCOS undergoing cardiac surgery until February 2019. Data from retrieved studies were abstracted and analyzed in a comprehensive meta-analysis. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction, renal failure/replacement therapy, need for inotropic therapy, need for left ventricular assist devices, ventricular arrhythmia and arterial hypotension. Results As a result of the online database search, six eligible RCTs with 1,326 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Preoperative levosimendan showed a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29–0.83; p<0.01), renal failure/replacement therapy (OR 0.48, CI 0.29–0.80; p<0.01) and need for inotropic therapy (OR 0.24, CI 0.06–0.95; p=0.04) compared to placebo. There were no significant differences in levosimendan vs. placebo concerning the rates of myocardial infarction (OR 0.61, p=0.38), need for left ventricular assist devices (OR 0.38, p=0.1), ventricular arrhythmia (OR 0.7, p=0.33), and arterial hypotension (OR 1.28, p=0.07). Conclusions Preoperative administration of levosimendan may improve survival in patients with low cardiac output syndrome undergoing cardiac surgery. It reduces need for inotropic medical support and renal failure/replace-ment therapy compared to placebo.


2020 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 89-95
Author(s):  
Alberto Zangrillo ◽  
Vladimir V. Lomivorotov ◽  
Antonio Pisano ◽  
Maria Grazia Calabrò ◽  
Alessandro Belletti ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document