New Oral Anticoagulant Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Thoracoscopic Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoonseo Lee ◽  
Dong Seop Jeong ◽  
Joonghyun Ahn ◽  
Kyoung-Min Park ◽  
Seung-Jung Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
New Oral Anticoagulant

scholarly journals Elderly patient with atrial fibrillation and coronary risks

2021 ◽  
pp. 51-57
Author(s):  
I. S. Yavelov
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Coronary Atherosclerosis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Randomized Controlled

The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary heart disease (CHD) increases with age. Obviously, this is largely due to the coincidence of risk factors for the occurrence and progression of AF and risk factors for the occurrence and progression of atherosclerosis, including coronary atherosclerosis. Vitamin K antagonists, which are necessary for stroke prevention in patients with AF, are also reported to be able to prevent thrombotic complications of coronary atherosclerosis. No studies specifically designed to compare direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists in the prevention of coronary thrombosis have been conducted, However, analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials ARISTOTLE, AUGUSTUS, PIONEER AF-PCI, REDUAL PCI, RE-LY and ROCKET AF indicates that in general DOACs are not inferior to warfarin in the ability to protect patients with AF from myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis. Accordingly, in stable patients with non-valvular AF (who have not suffered an acute coronary syndrome in the next 1 year or planned coronary stenting in the next 6 months) they can be used as monotherapy, without simultaneous administration of antiaggregants. Taking into account the data obtained in patients with sinus rhythm who recently had acute coronary syndrome in the randomized controlled trial ATLAS-ACS 2, as well as with stable atherosclerotic disease in the randomized controlled trial COMPASS, the greatest evidence base in the prevention of coronary complications has been accumulated with rivaroxaban. At the same time, the results of the COMPASS study, as well as analysis of daily medical practice indicate its additional benefits in patients with peripheral atherosclerosis.

Which Patients Would Be Willing to Change Anticoagulation From Vitamin-K Antagonists to a New Oral Anticoagulant?

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4318-4318
Author(s):  
Job Harenberg ◽  
Svetlana Marx ◽  
Nadja Abou-Ayash ◽  
Christophe Kremer ◽  
Vera Hoeing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
New Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Willingness To Change

Abstract Abstract 4318 New oral anticoagulants have generated promising data on the prophylaxis of systemic and non-systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and treatment of acute venous thromboembolism and prolonged prophylaxis of recurrent events. For patients on chronic treatment with vitamin-K antagonists (VKA) we analysed the motivation and willingness to change the anticoagulation from VKA to new oral anticoagulants. Patients (n=110) on stable treatment with VKA for at least 3 months (indication for anticoagulation: atrial fibrillation or VTE) completed a validated personality inventory (Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar FPI-R), and a self-developed questionnaire on general attitudes regarding anticoagulant therapy (Q1). Patients were divided in two groups according to the reply to the question weather they were willing to switch to a new oral anticoagulant. Out of these sets of questions 7 questions were identified by means of a logistic regression analysis for the willingness to change anticoagulation with VKA to a new oral anticoagulant. The same patients completed this shortened questionnaire (Q2) (n=85) thereafter. Logistic regression analysis defined the 7 items of the FPI and Q1 questionaires as relevant for willingness of patients to change the medication. The probability to change medication was 98% using the 7 questions (Q2) compared to the 2 comlete questionnaires. The items were: extraversion – introversion scale on the FPI-R consisting of 14 questions, and from Q1: hope for a better quality of life with a new anticoagulant, no scepticism for new drugs, wish of a lack of routine monitoring for dose adjustment, relevance of the practitioners opinion, thoughts in the past of alternatives for anticoagulation, and difficulty to adjust the prothrombin time. Using Q2 85% of patients confirmed to be willing to change the anticoagulant drug compared to Q1 (chi square test p<0.0001). Seven questions were identified and confirmed to identify patients for their willingness to change anticoagulation from VKA to a new oral anticoagulant. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Choice of New Oral Anticoagulant Agents Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Moreno-Arribas ◽  
Vicente Bertomeu-González ◽  
Manuel Anguita-Sanchez ◽  
Ángel Cequier ◽  
Javier Muñiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Anticoagulant Agents ◽  
New Oral Anticoagulant

scholarly journals Catheter ablation vs. thoracoscopic surgical ablation in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: CASA-AF randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (47) ◽  
pp. 4471-4480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shouvik Haldar ◽  
Habib Rehman Khan ◽  
Vennela Boyalla ◽  
Ines Kralj-Hans ◽  
Simon Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Surgical Ablation ◽  
Single Procedure ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Aims  Long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) is challenging to treat with suboptimal catheter ablation (CA) outcomes. Thoracoscopic surgical ablation (SA) has shown promising efficacy in atrial fibrillation (AF). This multicentre randomized controlled trial tested whether SA was superior to CA as the first interventional strategy in de novo LSPAF. Methods and results  We randomized 120 LSPAF patients to SA or CA. All patients underwent predetermined lesion sets and implantable loop recorder insertion. Primary outcome was single procedure freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) ≥30 s without anti-arrhythmic drugs at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included clinical success (≥75% reduction in AF/AT burden); procedure-related serious adverse events; changes in patients’ symptoms and quality-of-life scores; and cost-effectiveness. At 12 months, freedom from AF/AT was recorded in 26% (14/54) of patients in SA vs. 28% (17/60) in the CA group [OR 1.128, 95% CI (0.46–2.83), P = 0.83]. Reduction in AF/AT burden ≥75% was recorded in 67% (36/54) vs. 77% (46/60) [OR 1.13, 95% CI (0.67–4.08), P = 0.3] in SA and CA groups, respectively. Procedure-related serious adverse events within 30 days of intervention were reported in 15% (8/55) of patients in SA vs. 10% (6/60) in CA, P = 0.46. One death was reported after SA. Improvements in AF symptoms were greater following CA. Over 12 months, SA was more expensive and provided fewer quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared with CA (0.78 vs. 0.85, P = 0.02). Conclusion  Single procedure thoracoscopic SA is not superior to CA in treating LSPAF. Catheter ablation provided greater improvements in symptoms and accrued significantly more QALYs during follow-up than SA. Clinical Trial Registration ISRCTN18250790 and ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02755688

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document