Diagnose und Differenzialdiagnose von peripheren und zentralen Schwindelsyndromen

2019 ◽  
Vol 144 (12) ◽  
pp. 821-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Strupp ◽  
Katharina Feil ◽  
Andreas Zwergal

AbstractThe diagnosis of the various peripheral and central vestibular disorders is mainly based on the patient history (time course, type of symptoms, modulating factors, and accompanying symptoms) and a systematic clinical examination of the vestibular, ocular motor, and cerebellar systems (examination for nystagmus, head impulse test, positional maneuvers, Romberg test and examination for central ocular motor signs). The two most important laboratory tests are the “video-head impulse test” and caloric irrigation. Fortunately, the diagnosis of vestibular disorders has become easier and more precise as a result of the very clinically oriented diagnostic criteria of the Bárány Society (www.jvr-web.org/ICVD.html).

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holger A. Rambold

This retrospective study examines acute unilateral vestibular failure (up to seven days after onset) with modern vestibular testing (caloric irrigation and video-head-impulse test, vHIT) in 54 patients in order to test if the short-term outcome of the patients depends on the lesion pattern defined by the two tests. Patients were grouped according to a pathological unilateral caloric weakness without a pathological vHIT: group I; additional a pathological vHIT of the lateral semicircular canal (SCC): group II; and an additional pathological vHIT of the anterior SCC: group III. Patients with involvement of the posterior SCC were less frequent and not included in the analysis. Basic parameters, such as age of the subjects, days after symptom onset, gender, side of the lesion, treatment, and dizziness handicap inventory, were not different in groups I to III. The frequency of pathological clinical findings and pathological quantified measurements increased from groups I to III. The outcome parameter “days spent in the hospital” was significantly higher in group III compared to group I. The analysis shows that differential vestibular testing predicts short-term outcome of the patients and might be in future important to treat and coach patients with vestibular failure.


Neurology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 90 (13) ◽  
pp. 602-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong-Yoon Choi ◽  
Hyo-Jung Kim ◽  
Ji-Soo Kim

The head impulse test (HIT) is used to evaluate the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) during a high-velocity head rotation. Corrective catch-up saccades that occur during or after the HITs usually indicate peripheral vestibular hypofunction, whereas in acute vestibular syndrome, normal clinical (bedside) HITs should prompt a search for a central lesion. However, recent quantitative studies that evaluated HITs using magnetic search coils or video-based techniques have demonstrated that specific patterns of HIT abnormalities are associated with central vestibular disorders. While normal clinical HITs are typical of central lesions, discrepancies have been observed between clinical and quantitative HITs. The horizontal head impulse VOR gains can be significantly reduced unilaterally or bilaterally (positive HITs) in lesions involving the vestibular nucleus, nucleus prepositus hypoglossi, or flocculus. In diffuse cerebellar lesions, the VOR gain during horizontal head impulses may increase (hyperactive) with corrective saccades directed the opposite way. The presence of cross-coupled vertical corrective saccades during horizontal HITs is also suggestive of diffuse cerebellar lesions. Lesions involving the vestibular nucleus, medial longitudinal fasciculus, and cerebellum may show decreased or increased gains of the VOR during vertical HITs. Defining the differences in patterns observed during abnormal HITs may help practitioners localize the responsible lesions in both central and peripheral vestibulopathy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0017
Author(s):  
Michael S Karl ◽  
Arielle Darvin ◽  
Robert C O’Reilly ◽  
Megan Beam ◽  
Karen Dillon

Background: Dizziness is the second most common symptom in people who sustain a concussion and there are few reports on vestibular laboratory findings in the concussed pediatric population. Studies to date have shown conflicting findings regarding incidence of peripheral vestibular disorders. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study is to report vestibular laboratory and clinical examination findings in concussed youth referred to a multidisciplinary vestibular clinic. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients (n=474) seen from August 2017 to March 2020 for a single comprehensive examination in a multidisciplinary pediatric vestibular specialty clinic. Data was extracted from the charts of patients (n=64) with a history of concussion referred because of chronic dizziness and/or imbalance. Each patient was examined by a neurotologist, physical therapist, and audiologist with specialized training in vestibular disorders. Vestibular laboratory testing performed by audiologists included video nystagmography (VNG) evaluation of oculomotor function and BPPV, rotational chair, video head impulse test (vHIT), vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs), post-headshake nystagmus, and caloric irrigation. Physical therapy clinical examination included dynamic visual acuity testing (DVA), vestibular/oculomotor screening (VOMS), and sensory organization test (SOT). Not all tests were performed on every patient secondary to factors such as insurance coverage, patient tolerance, and young age. Results: 1 or more components of VOMS was abnormal in 30 of 53 patients examined. DVA was completed on 40 patients, 23 of which were reported as abnormal. SOT was completed on 46 patients, 18 of which demonstrated below normal composite equilibrium scores. Laboratory findings were as follows: VEMPs (n=50) were normal in all but 1 patient, vHIT (n=59), caloric irrigation (n=26), post-headshake nystagmus (n=49), and positional testing (n=55) were normal on all patients tested. Rotational chair (n=60) was performed at 4 different frequencies and revealed low gain in 3 patients. Conclusion: Vestibular laboratory examination was normal in nearly all subjects tested. These results suggest that in concussed youth with chronic dizziness and/or imbalance, laboratory vestibular test outcomes indicative of peripheral dysfunction are rare, which contradicts previous research in this population. In contrast, clinical vestibular assessment was abnormal in more than 50% of subjects examined which suggests that clinicians should use caution interpreting clinical examination findings for diagnosing peripheral vestibular dysfunction. Abnormal clinical examination findings may be indicative of central vestibular conditions such as space and motion intolerance and PPPD in chronically dizzy pediatric patients after concussion. Tables/Figures: [Table: see text][Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-295
Author(s):  
Sabuhi JAFAROV ◽  
Hüseyin Samet KOCA ◽  
Evren HIZAL ◽  
Levent Naci ÖZLÜOĞLU

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 5726
Author(s):  
Raymond van de Berg ◽  
Herman Kingma

History taking is crucial in the diagnostic process for vestibular disorders. To facilitate the process, systems such as TiTrATE, SO STONED, and DISCOHAT have been used to describe the different paradigms; together, they address the most important aspects of history taking, viz. time course, triggers, and accompanying symptoms. However, multiple (vestibular) disorders may co-occur in the same patient. This complicates history taking, since the time course, triggers, and accompanying symptoms can vary, depending on the disorder. History taking can, therefore, be improved by addressing the important aspects of each co-occurring vestibular disorder separately. The aim of this document is to describe a four-step approach for improving history taking in patients with non-acute vestibular symptoms, by guiding the clinician and the patient through the history taking process. It involves a systematic approach that explicitly identifies all co-occurring vestibular disorders in the same patient, and which addresses each of these vestibular disorders separately. The four steps are: (1) describing any attack(s) of vertigo and/or dizziness; (2) describing any chronic vestibular symptoms; (3) screening for functional, psychological, and psychiatric co-morbidity; (4) establishing a comprehensive diagnosis, including all possible co-occurring (vestibular) disorders. In addition, pearls and pitfalls will be discussed separately for each step.


2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 348-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Blödow ◽  
Sebastian Pannasch ◽  
Leif Erik Walther

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document