scholarly journals Pulmonary Imaging of Immunocompromised Patients during Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation using Non-Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Ultrashort Echo Time (3D-UTE) MRI

Author(s):  
Corona Metz ◽  
David Böckle ◽  
Julius Frederik Heidenreich ◽  
Andreas Max Weng ◽  
Thomas Benkert ◽  
...  

Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of non-contrast-enhanced three-dimensional ultrashort echo time (3D-UTE) MRI for pulmonary imaging in immunocompromised patients during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Methods MRI was performed using a stack-of-spirals 3D-UTE sequence (slice thickness: 2.34mm; matrix: 256 × 256; acquisition time: 12.7–17.6 seconds) enabling imaging of the entire thorax within single breath-holds. Patients underwent MRI before HSCT initiation, in the case of periprocedural pneumonia, before discharge, and in the case of re-hospitalization. Two readers separately assessed the images regarding presence of pleural effusions, ground glass opacities (GGO), and consolidations on a per lung basis. A T2-weighted (T2w) multi-shot Turbo Spin Echo sequence (BLADE) was acquired in coronal orientation during breath-hold (slice thickness: 6.00mm; matrix: 320 × 320; acquisition time: 3.1–5.5 min) and read on a per lesion basis. Low-dose CT scans in inspiration were used as reference and were read on a per lung basis. Only scans performed within a maximum of three days were included in the inter-method analyses. Interrater agreement, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy of 3D-UTE MRI were calculated. Results 67 MRI scans of 28 patients were acquired. A reference CT examination was available for 33 scans of 23 patients. 3D-UTE MRI showed high sensitivity and specificity regarding pleural effusions (n = 6; sensitivity, 92 %; specificity, 100 %) and consolidations (n = 22; sensitivity 98 %, specificity, 86 %). Diagnostic performance was lower for GGO (n = 9; sensitivity, 63 %; specificity, 84 %). Accuracy rates were high (pleural effusions, 98 %; GGO, 79 %; consolidations 94 %). Interrater agreement was substantial for consolidations and pleural effusions (κ = 0.69–0.82) and moderate for GGO (κ = 0.54). Compared to T2w imaging, 3D-UTE MRI depicted the assessed pathologies with at least equivalent quality and was rated superior regarding consolidations and GGO in ~50 %. Conclusion Non-contrast 3D-UTE MRI enables radiation-free assessment of typical pulmonary complications during HSCT procedure within a single breath-hold. Yet, CT was found to be superior regarding the identification of pure GGO changes. Key Points:  Citation Format

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susann-Cathrin Olthof ◽  
Christian Reinert ◽  
Konstantin Nikolaou ◽  
Christina Pfannenberg ◽  
Sergios Gatidis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Detection of pulmonary nodules in MRI requires fast imaging strategies without respiratory motion impairment, such as single-breath-hold Cartesian VIBE. As patients with pulmonary diseases have limited breath-hold capacities, this study investigates the clinical feasibility of non-Cartesian Spiral VIBE under free-breathing compared to CT as the gold standard. Methods Prospective analysis of 27 oncological patients examined in PET/CT and PET/MR. A novel motion-robust 3D ultrashort-echo-time (UTE) MR sequence was evaluated in comparison with CT and conventional breath-hold MR. CT scans were performed under breath-hold in end-expiratory and end-inspiratory position (CT ex, CT in). MR data was acquired with non-contrast-enhanced breath-hold Cartesian VIBE followed by a free-breathing 3D UTE Spiral VIBE. Impact of respiratory motion on pulmonary evaluation was investigated by two readers in Cartesian VIBE, followed by UTE Spiral VIBE and CT ex and the reference standard of CT in. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated, and visual image quality assessed. Results Higher detection rate and sensitivity of pulmonary nodules in free-breathing UTE Spiral VIBE in comparison with breath-hold Cartesian VIBE were found for lesions > 10 mm (UTE Spiral VIBE/VIBE/CT ex): 93%/54%/100%; Lesions 5–10 mm: 67%/25%/ 92%; Lesions < 5 mm: 11%/11%/78%. Lobe-based analysis revealed sensitivities and specificities of 64%/96%/41% and 96%/93%/100% for UTE Spiral VIBE/VIBE/CT ex. Conclusion Free-breathing UTE Spiral VIBE indicates higher sensitivity for detection of pulmonary nodules than breath-hold Cartesian VIBE and is a promising but time-consuming approach. However, sensitivity and specificity of inspiratory CT remain superior in comparison and should be preferred for detection of pulmonary lesions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 865-876
Author(s):  
Tiago Ferreira da Silva ◽  
Carlos Galan-Arriola ◽  
Paula Montesinos ◽  
Gonzalo Javier López-Martín ◽  
Manuel Desco ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To propose and validate a novel imaging sequence that uses a single breath-hold whole-heart 3D T1 saturation recovery compressed SENSE rapid acquisition (SACORA) at 3T. Methods The proposed sequence combines flexible saturation time sampling, compressed SENSE, and sharing of saturation pulses between two readouts acquired at different RR intervals. The sequence was compared with a 3D saturation recovery single-shot acquisition (SASHA) implementation with phantom and in vivo experiments (pre and post contrast; 7 pigs) and was validated against the reference inversion recovery spin echo (IR-SE) sequence in phantom experiments. Results Phantom experiments showed that the T1 maps acquired by 3D SACORA and 3D SASHA agree well with IR-SE. In vivo experiments showed that the pre-contrast and post-contrast T1 maps acquired by 3D SACORA are comparable to the corresponding 3D SASHA maps, despite the shorter acquisition time (15s vs. 188s, for a heart rate of 60 bpm). Mean septal pre-contrast T1 was 1453 ± 44 ms with 3D SACORA and 1460 ± 60 ms with 3D SASHA. Mean septal post-contrast T1 was 824 ± 66 ms and 824 ± 60 ms. Conclusion 3D SACORA acquires 3D T1 maps in 15 heart beats (heart rate, 60 bpm) at 3T. In addition to its short acquisition time, the sequence achieves good T1 estimation precision and accuracy.


Radiology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 210 (2) ◽  
pp. 566-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winfried Kessler ◽  
Gerhard Laub ◽  
Stephan Achenbach ◽  
Dieter Ropers ◽  
Werner Moshage ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 470-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoming Bi ◽  
Jaeseok Park ◽  
Andrew C. Larson ◽  
Qiang Zhang ◽  
Orlando Simonetti ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 198 (3) ◽  
pp. 725-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
J J Snidow ◽  
M S Johnson ◽  
V J Harris ◽  
P M Margosian ◽  
A M Aisen ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Huber ◽  
Markus E. Oelhafen ◽  
Sebastian Kozerke ◽  
Oliver M. Weber ◽  
Peter Boesiger

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 685-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Boudewijn C. Vasbinder ◽  
Jeffrey H. Maki ◽  
Robbert J. Nijenhuis ◽  
Tim Leiner ◽  
Gregory J. Wilson ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Li ◽  
David Chavez ◽  
Robert R. Edelman ◽  
Pottumarthi V. Prasad

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document