scholarly journals COVID-19 and Myocarditis: Findings from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Endomyocardial Biopsies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Greulich ◽  
Karin Klingel

AbstractDiagnosing myocarditis is still challenging due to its varying presentation ranging from none or mild symptoms to sudden cardiac death. Clinical presentation, electrocardiography, and cardiac biomarkers seem not to be sufficient for a reliable diagnosis. In fact, an unequivocal myocardial characterization is needed, applying endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), a technique which demonstrates high accuracy to histology. Besides the assessment of functional parameters (volumes, ejection fraction), established late gadolinium enhancement and recent T1 and T2 mapping techniques including the calculation of extracellular volume fraction allow distinct myocardial tissue analysis by a noninvasive approach without the need of radiation. However, EMB is the only method which allows the identification of the underlying etiology of cardiac inflammation. Since myocardial damage and inflammation seem to be prevalent in a considerable number of patients even in the mid-term range after COVID-19, CMR and EMB seem to be adequate tools to further investigate these findings. In this article, we will (1) review current knowledge about the role of CMR in the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) report about our own EMB findings in COVID-19 patients in the Cardiopathology Center of our University Hospital.

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 699.1-699
Author(s):  
A. Gil-Vila ◽  
G. Burcet ◽  
A. Anton-Vicente ◽  
D. Gonzalez-Sans ◽  
A. Nuñez-Conde ◽  
...  

Background:Antisynthetase syndrome (ASS) is characterized by inflammatory myopathy, interstitial lung disease, arthritis, mechanical hands and Raynaud phenomenon, among other features. Recent studies have shown that idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) may develop cardiac involvement, either ischemic (coronary artery disease) or inflammatory (myocarditis). We wonder if characteristic lung interstitial involvement (interstitial lung disease) that appears in patients with the ASS may also affect the myocardial interstitial tissue. New magnetic resonance mapping techniques could detect subclinical myocardial involvement, mainly as edema (increase extracellular volume in interstitium and extracellular matrix), even in the absence of visible late Gadolinium enhancement (LGE).Objectives:Our aim was to describe the presence of interstitial myocarditis in a group of patients with ASS.Methods:Cross-sectional, observational study performed in a tertiary care center. We included 13 patients diagnosed with ASS (7 male, 53%, mean (SD) age at diagnosis 56,8 years (±11,8)). The patients were consecutively selected from our outpatient myositis clinic. Myositis specific and associated antibodies were performed by means of line immunoblot (EUROIMMUN©). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed on all patients. The study protocol includes functional cine magnetic resonance and standard late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), as well as novel parametric T1 and T2 mapping sequences (modified look locker inversion recovery sequences - MOLLI) with extracellular volume (ECV) calculation 20 minutes after the injection of a gadolinium-based contrast material.Results:CMR could not be performed in one patient due to anxiety. All patients studied (12) had a normal biventricular function, without alteration of segmental contraction. A third (4 out of 12, 33%) of the studied patients showed elevated T2 myocardial values without focal LGE, half of them (2/4) with an elevated ECV, consistent with myocardial edema. Two patients with normal T2 values showed unspecific LGE focal patterns, one in the right ventricle union points and another with mild interventricular septum enhancement (Figure 1). None of the patients studied refer any cardiac symptomatology. All the four patients with T2 mapping alterations (100%) had interstitial lung involvement, but only 4 out of 8 (50%) of the rest ASS patients without T2 mapping positivity. The autoimmune profile was as follows: 10 anti-Jo1/Ro52, 1 anti-EJ/Ro52, 2 anti-PL12.Conclusion:Myocarditis, although subclinical, appears to be a feature in ASS patients. T1 and T2 mapping sequences might be valuable to detect and monitor subclinical cardiac involvement in these patients. The possibility that the same etiopathogenic mechanism may be involved in the interstitial tissue in lung and myocardium is raised. More studies must be done in order to assert the prevalence of myocarditis in ASS.References:[1]Dieval C et al. Myocarditis in Patients With Antisynthetase Syndrome: Prevalence, Presentation, and Outcomes. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(26):e798.[2]Myhr KA, Pecini R. Management of Myocarditis in Myositis: Diagnosis and Treatment. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2020 Jul 22; 22:49.[3]Sharma K, Orbai AM, Desai D, Cingolani OH, Halushka MK, Christopher-Stine L, Mammen AL, Wu KC, Zakaria S. Brief report: antisynthetase syndrome-associated myocarditis. J Card Fail. 2014 Dec;20(12):939-45.Figure 1.Cardiac magnetic resonance images from ASS patients.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Gravina ◽  
Luca Pio Stoppino ◽  
Grazia Casavecchia ◽  
Angelo Pio Moffa ◽  
Roberta Vinci ◽  
...  

Background. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) has recently emerged as a new noninvasive imaging modality that offers superior structural and functional assessment of the heart. cMRI benefits from a large field of view but, consequently, may capture incidental extracardiac findings (IEFs). We aimed to evaluate the frequency and significance of IEFs reported from clinically indicated cMRI scans. Methods. 742 consecutive patients (402 males and 340 females) referred to the Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Center of our University Hospital between January 2015 and December 2016 for clinically indicated cMRI were retrospectively enrolled for the evaluation of IEF prevalence and relevance. The median age of the subjects was 51 years (range: 5–85 years). Results. A significant number of patients who underwent cMRI had incidental and clinically significant IEFs (2% of the population, 11.4% of cases). cMRI allowed a correct diagnosis in 116/131 cases with a diagnostic accuracy value of 88.5%. Conclusions. IEFs on cMRI are not uncommon and lesions with mild or no clinical significance represent the most frequent findings. cMRI can characterize incidental findings with high accuracy in most cases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document