Acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines by liver transplant recipients and candidates

Author(s):  
Philipp A. Reuken ◽  
Stefanie Albers ◽  
Falk Rauchfuss ◽  
Pavel Strnad ◽  
Utz Settmacher ◽  
...  

AbstractGuidelines recommend vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in transplant recipients, candidates, and their household contacts. However, little is known about the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines in these groups.In March 2021, we surveyed 826 liver transplant recipients, candidates, and their household contacts to determine acceptance rates and factors influencing the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine; 341 patients (40%) and 237 household contacts (28%) returned the questionnaire. Ninety percent of patients returning the survey reported they were willing to receive the vaccine within the next 6 months or had already started vaccination. Only 2% of patients and 4% of household contacts reported refusing the vaccine, and 8% of patients and 9% of household contacts wanted to postpone vaccination because of concerns about side effects. Having received the influenza vaccine in the last 2 seasons was the strongest indicator of acceptance to receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine within 6 months (odds ratio 5.11; 95% confidence interval 2.43–10.74; p < 0.001). Thirty-two percent of responding patients reported fear of side effects as a reason for having refused vaccination before.Although the acceptance of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was particularly high among German liver transplant recipients, candidates, and household contacts in this survey, transplant physicians are encouraged to discuss safety concerns with patients who have refused the seasonal influenza vaccine in the past.

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Duchini ◽  
R. Michael Hendry ◽  
Lisa M. Nyberg ◽  
M. Eric Viernes ◽  
Paul J. Pockros

2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 491-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iva Hojsak ◽  
Yaron Avitzur ◽  
Eitan Mor ◽  
Raanan Shamir ◽  
Yishay Haimi-Cohen ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-148
Author(s):  
Susan L Smith ◽  
Marianne Wittman

The focus of posttransplant care and clinical research has been on the management of rejection and short-term side effects associated with immunosuppressive therapy. Long-term side effects have only recently been recognized as potential health problems in liver transplant recipients. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the feasibility of using the Healthier People Version 4.0 Health Risk Appraisal as a tool for identifying existing and potential risk factors for premature disease and death among asymptomatic liver transplant recipients and to describe health risks in adult liver transplant recipients. The sample consisted of 50 adult first-time liver transplant recipients. It was found that this tool highlights health risks affecting life expectancy and pinpoints risks that an individual can control. It also provides practitioners with information necessary to design appropriate prevention and health promotion strategies to assure better health and quality of life for patients following liver transplantation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 783-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Lopez-Solis ◽  
Michael DeVera ◽  
Jennifer Steel ◽  
Sheila Fedorek ◽  
Mark Sturdevant ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Ferguson ◽  
Marisa Holubar ◽  
Waldo Concepcion ◽  
Dora Y. Ho ◽  

Liver transplant recipients (LTRs) are at risk for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) infections which can lead to significant morbidity or mortality. Antibiotic exposure, including vancomycin, is associated with greater risk of VRE infection. This study aimed to assess the appropriateness of vancomycin use and rates of VRE infection in this population. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 327 patients who underwent liver transplantation at our center from January 1, 2012 to June 30, 2017. Sixty (18.3%) LTRs had at least one VRE-positive culture between six-months pre-transplant and six-months post-transplant. LTRs with VRE had greater vancomycin exposure as compared to VRE-negative LTRs (p < 0.05) and were more likely to receive prolonged vancomycin courses (> 72 hours, p < 0.05). Overall appropriateness of vancomycin use > 72 hours among VRE-positive LTRs was only 26.8%. Inappropriate vancomycin use most commonly occurred in patients with presumed sepsis without an identifiable source or pneumonia with negative respiratory cultures. Our findings illustrate an opportunity to improve antibiotic stewardship and reduce vancomycin use in the transplant population


Vaccine ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (25) ◽  
pp. 4187-4189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuka Torii ◽  
Hiroshi Kimura ◽  
Nobuhiko Ochi ◽  
Kenitiro Kaneko ◽  
Hisami Ando ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document