Enhancing the Effectiveness of Diabetes Self-Management Education: The Diabetes Literacy Project

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (13) ◽  
pp. 933-938 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Van den Broucke ◽  
G. Van der Zanden ◽  
P. Chang ◽  
G. Doyle ◽  
D. Levin ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henna Riemenschneider ◽  
Sarama Saha ◽  
Stephan van den Broucke ◽  
Helle Terkildsen Maindal ◽  
Gerardine Doyle ◽  
...  

Background. Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is considered essential for improving the prevention and care of diabetes through empowering patients to increase agency in their own health and care processes. However, existing evidence regarding DSME in the EU Member States (EU MS) is insufficient to develop an EU-wide strategy. Objectives. This study presents the state of DSME in the 28 EU MS and contrasts it with 3 non-EU countries with comparable Human Development Index score: Israel, Taiwan, and the USA (ITU). Because type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) disproportionately affects minority and low-income groups, we paid particular attention to health literacy aspects of DSME for vulnerable populations. Methods. Data from multiple stakeholders involved in diabetes care were collected from Feb 2014 to Jan 2015 using an online Diabetes Literacy Survey (DLS). Of the 379 respondents (249 from EU MS and 130 from ITU), most were people with diabetes (33% in the EU MS, 15% in ITU) and care providers (47% and 72%). These data were supplemented by an expert survey (ES) administered to 30 key informants. Results. Access to DSME varies greatly in the EU MS: an average of 29% (range 21% to 50%) of respondents report DSME programs are tailored for people with limited literacy, educational attainment, and language skills versus 63% in ITU. More than half of adult T2DM patients and children/adolescents participate in DSME in EU MS; in ITU, participation of T1DM patients and older people is lower. Prioritization of DSME (6.1 ± 2.8 out of 10) and the level of satisfaction with the current state of DSME (5.0 ± 2.4 out of 10) in the EU MS were comparable with ITU. Conclusion. Variation in availability and organization of DSME in the EU MS presents a clear rationale for developing an EU-wide diabetes strategy to improve treatment and care for people with diabetes.


Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 658-P ◽  
Author(s):  
RUBÉN SILVA-TINOCO ◽  
DANIELA G. MEZA ◽  
DAVID GARCIA MARTINEZ ◽  
JAVIER OROZCO ◽  
MARIA ELENA ROMERO-IBARGUENGOITIA ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Cook ◽  
Julie Hathaway ◽  
Sharon Prinsen ◽  
Erin Fischer ◽  
Anilga Moradkhani ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 53-LB
Author(s):  
BINA JAYAPAUL-PHILIP ◽  
SHIFAN DAI ◽  
EFOMO WOGHIREN ◽  
GIA E. RUTLEDGE

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2180-PUB
Author(s):  
ADDIE L. FORTMANN ◽  
ALESSANDRA BASTIAN ◽  
CODY J. LENSING ◽  
SHANE HOVERSTEN ◽  
KIMBERLY LUU ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kisokanth G. ◽  
Indrakumar J. ◽  
Prathapan S. ◽  
Joseph J. ◽  
Ilankoon I.M.P.S.

This study was aimed to assess the effectiveness of diabetes self-management education (DSME) in the improvement of glycemic control among patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in Batticaloa District, Sri Lanka. The study was a prospective interventional study and conducted as a preliminary study at medical clinic, Base hospital, Kaluwanchikudy, Batticaloa. Thirty patients with T2DM were included based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. A structured individual diabetes self-management education for 10 hours (one hour per week) was delivered to diabetic patients by the trained Nurse Health Educator. Glycosylate hemoglobin (HbA1c) was assessed as a main outcome measure and Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS), Body Mass Index (BMI) of each patient were also measured and recorded before and after the intervention. The respondent rate was 96.7% (n = 29). Majority of them were females (n = 25, 86.2%). A Wilcoxon signed rank test showed that DSME had a statistically significant reduction in HbA1c [8.60 (IQR 2.60) vs. 7.40 (IQR 2.10), p = .000] and FBS level [159.00 (IQR 77.50) vs. 134.00 (IQR 40.50), p = .002] at 3 months of intervention. The mean BMI at baseline was higher compared to 3 months of intervention [24.88 (SD ± 3.06) vs. 24.19 (SD ± 2.79)] which was statistically significant (p = .000). Majority of participants (n = 22, 75.9%) had improved their HbA1c level by ≥ 0.5% in 3 months. The diabetes self-management education is an effective measure in improving glycemic control and other clinical parameters among patients with T2DM. Thus, DSME needs to be implemented among clinic patients with T2DM for the better outcome and the preventions of complications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document