Non-Inversion Factor VIII Mutations in 80 Hemophilia A Families Including 24 with Alloimmune Responses

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (02) ◽  
pp. 273-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miao-Liang Liu ◽  
Shelley Nakaya ◽  
Arthur Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
De Novo ◽  
High Titer ◽  
Direct Sequencing ◽  
Normal Variant ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Gene Deletions ◽  
Intron Splice ◽  
Splice Junctions

SummaryHeteroduplex screening identified 74 small mutations in the factor VIII genes of 72 families with hemophilia A. In addition, patients from 3 families with high titer inhibitors had partial gene deletions and 5 unrelated families that were negative for heteroduplex formation had a mutation on direct sequencing. The latter had mild hemophilia A with an inhibitor, and sequencing their exon 23 fragments found a transition predicting a recurrent Arg2150 to His. Of 69 distinct mutations (including the 3 partial gene deletions), 47 are novel. Of small mutations, 51 were missense (one possibly a normal variant and two that could also alter splicing) at 39 sites, 13 were small deletions or insertions (3 inframe and one a normal variant in an intron), 13 were nonsense at 12 sites and 2 altered intron splice junctions. In 24 families, at least one affected member had evidence for an alloimmune response to factor VIII; of these, 11 were associated with missense mutations. In 14 families, de novo origin was demonstrated.

Inhibitor Development In Patients with Mild and Moderate Hemophilia A: Results From a Single Centre.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1407-1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohann Repesse ◽  
Philippe Gautier ◽  
Annie Borel-Derlon
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Direct Sequencing ◽  
Immunosuppressive Treatment ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Treatment Centre

Abstract Abstract 1407 The development of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors is usually considered uncommon among patients with mild and moderate hemophilia A (HA) and less frequent than in patients with severe HA. We report here the prevalence of FVIII inhibitors and their caracteristics in 167 patients with mild and moderate HA followed in Caen Hemophilia Treatment Centre (Table). FVIII molecular defects were identified by direct sequencing in 167 patients including 30 and 137 with mild and moderate HA, respectively. Following FVIII concentrates infusions, FVIII inhibitors occured in 7.8% of patients (13/167). Fifteen percent (2/13) were low-responding inhibitors. The risk of inhibitor development appeared to be associated with high-risk FVIII genotypes clustered in the A2 and C2 domains, especially p.Arg2150His (50%) and p.Arg593Cys mutations. Interestingly, we described inhibitor development associated with novel missense-mutations (p.Tyr1786Ser, p.Asp115Tyr and -219C>T substitutions in FVIII gene promoter). In addition, high regimen infusion of FVIII concentrates appeared as risk factor for FVIII inhibitors development. Indeed, 60% (8/13) developped FVIII inhibitors following massive infusion of FVIII concentrates associated with FVIII:C levels above 1.2 UI/dL. Inhibitors in mild HA usually cross-react with endogenous factor VIII reducing the circulating basal FVIII:C level and are associated with more bleeding events. Similarly, we observed the evolution of bleeding patterns in our cohort to severe phenotypes. Bleedings were treated with FVIII concentrates and bypassing therapies (activated FVII and activated-prothrombin complex). About 25% (3/13) of these inhibitors disappeared spontaneously. Induction of Immune Tolerance (ITI) protocoles with high doses of FVIII were initiated for 7 high-responding patients with a success rate of 85 % (6/7). However, inhibitors persisted long-term and remained troublesome in 1 of these patients despite of ITI protocole. For two patients, immunosuppressive treatment with corticosteroids was started. Inhibitors disappeared and the levels of FVIII:C became detectable within 6 months. Development of FVIII inhibitors, their disappearance and the efficacy of ITI regimen seem to be different from our experience between patients with mild or moderate HA and severe HA. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Acquired hemophilia A and plasma cell neoplasms: a case report and review of the literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna A. Jalowiec ◽  
Martin Andres ◽  
Behrouz Mansouri Taleghani ◽  
Albulena Musa ◽  
Martina Dickenmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
High Titer ◽  
Coagulation Factor ◽  
Laboratory Diagnostics ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia A ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia ◽  
Plasma Cell Neoplasm ◽  
Cell Neoplasm

Abstract Background Acquired hemophilia A is a rare autoimmune disease with clinically often significant bleeding diathesis resulting from circulating autoantibodies inhibiting coagulation factor VIII. Half of acquired hemophilia A cases are associated with an underlying disorder, such as autoimmune diseases, cancer, or use of certain drugs, or occur during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. In the other half, no underlying cause is identified. An association of acquired hemophilia A with plasma cell neoplasm seems to be extremely rare. Case presentation We describe a case of a 77-year-old Swiss Caucasian man who was diagnosed with acquired hemophilia A and smoldering multiple myeloma as an underlying cause. Acquired hemophilia A was treated with prednisolone, cyclophosphamide, and immunoadsorption. Extensive workup revealed a plasma cell neoplasm as the only disorder associated with or underlying the acquired hemophilia A. For long-term control of acquired hemophilia A, we considered treatment of the plasma cell neoplasm necessary, and a VRD (bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) regimen was initiated. Due to multiple complications, VRD was reduced to VRD-lite after two cycles. After nine cycles of induction therapy and five cycles of consolidation therapy, the patient is in complete remission of his acquired hemophilia A and very good partial remission of the plasma cell neoplasm. We conducted a literature review to identify additional cases of this rare association and identified 15 other cases. Case descriptions, including the sequence of occurrence of acquired hemophilia A and plasma cell neoplasm , treatment, evolution, and outcome are presented. Discussion and conclusions Our case, together with 15 other cases described in the literature, underscore the possibility of plasma cell neoplasm as an underlying cause of acquired hemophilia A. Physicians should consider including protein electrophoresis, immunofixation, and analysis of free light chains in laboratory diagnostics when treating a patient with acquired hemophilia A. The occurrence of excessive and unexplained bleeding in patients diagnosed with plasma cell neoplasm should raise suspicion of secondary acquired hemophilia A and trigger the request for coagulation tests, particularly in patients treated with immunomodulatory drugs such as thalidomide or lenalidomide. Additionally, early intervention with immunoadsorption can be lifesaving in cases with high-titer factor VIII inhibitors, especially when surgical interventions are necessary.

scholarly journals F8 gene mutation type and inhibitor development in patients with severe hemophilia A: systematic review and meta-analysis

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (12) ◽  
pp. 2922-2934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha C. Gouw ◽  
H. Marijke van den Berg ◽  
Johannes Oldenburg ◽  
Jan Astermark ◽  
Philip G. de Groot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Gene Mutation ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
High Titer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Inhibitor Development

Abstract This systematic review was designed to provide more precise effect estimates of inhibitor development for the various types of F8 gene mutations in patients with severe hemophilia A. The primary outcome was inhibitor development and the secondary outcome was high-titer-inhibitor development. A systematic literature search was performed to include cohort studies published in peer-reviewed journals with data on inhibitor incidences in the various F8 gene mutation types and a mutation detection rate of at least 80%. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) of inhibitor development for different types of F8 gene mutations were calculated with intron 22 inversion as the reference. Data were included from 30 studies on 5383 patients, including 1029 inhibitor patients. The inhibitor risk in large deletions and nonsense mutations was higher than in intron 22 inversions (pooled OR = 3.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.3-5.7 and OR = 1.4, 95% CI, 1.1-1.8, respectively), the risk in intron 1 inversions and splice-site mutations was equal (pooled OR = 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6-1.5 and OR = 1.0; 95% CI, 0.6-1.5), and the risk in small deletions/insertions and missense mutations was lower (pooled OR = 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.6 and OR = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4, respectively). The relative risks for developing high titer inhibitors were similar.

Differential Immunodominance of Human and Porcine Factor VIII in Hemophilia A Mice.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 40-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Healey ◽  
Ernest T. Parker ◽  
Rachel T. Barrow ◽  
Pete Lollar
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
High Titer ◽  
Domain Specificity ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
C2 Domains ◽  
Intravenous Injections ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
Human Factor Viii ◽  
Chi Square Test

Abstract Hemophilia A inhibitor patients and patients with acquired hemophilia A recognize immunodominant epitopes in the A2 and C2 domains of human factor VIII (fVIII). Hemophilia A mice also recognize A2 and C2 domain epitopes when immunized with human fVIII using a dosing schedule that mimics clinical use. We compared the immune responses of hemophilia A mice to human and porcine fVIII using a domain specific ELISA. In this assay, monoclonal antibodies are tested against a panel of six single human fVIII domain hybrid human/porcine fVIII molecules that contain the human A1, A2, ap, A3, C1 or C2 domains. With anti-human antibodies, a positive signal with one of the single human domain proteins identifies domain specificity, whereas loss of signal indicates domain specificity of anti-porcine fVIII antibodies. Exon16 (E16) - disrupted hemophilia A mice (n = 3) received six weekly μ10 g/kg intravenous injections of recombinant B-domain deleted human fVIII and a final 25 μg/kg boost. To obtain comparable inhibitor titers, E16 mice (n = 3) received six weekly injections of μ40 g/kg of recombinant B-domain deleted porcine fVIII. Spleens from high titer mice were fused with NS1 mouse myeloma cells and 485 of the resulting hybridomas were analyzed for fVIII domain specificity (Table). Only two hybridomas secreted antibodies specific for the ap domain. Human fVIII elicited a significantly greater number of antibodies to the A2 domain, whereas porcine fVIII elicited a significantly greater number of antibodies to the A1 and A3 domains (p < 0.01, chi square test). The greater number of anti-C2 antibodies to human fVIII was not significant at the 95% confidence level (p = 0.08). The differential immunodominance of human and porcine fVIII epitopes suggests that it may be possible to design a recombinant hybrid human/porcine fVIII molecule that is less immunogenic than human fVIII in the treatment of patients with hemophilia A. Domain Specificity of Anti-FVIII MAbs Mouse ID: Immunogen No. of MAbs A1 A2 A3 C1 C2 CR & MD CR: Cross Reactive MD: Multidomain 1- Human fVIII 95 2 16 2 7 21 23 & 24 2- Human fVIII 126 13 23 1 2 27 39 & 21 3- Human fVIII 54 1 15 2 1 10 9 & 15 4- Porcine fVIII 123 39 7 19 8 16 33 & 0 5- Porcine fVIII 27 13 5 0 0 4 2 & 3 6- Porcine fVIII 60 9 6 12 1 9 13 & 10

Successful Treatment of Inhibitor Formation in Adult Congenital Hemophilia A with Rituximab.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4074-4074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chirag J. Amin ◽  
Alice D. Ma
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Knee Replacement ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Bolus Dose ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
High Titer ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Recombinant Factor Viii ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction

Abstract Inhibitor development in congenital hemophiliacs can be clinically catastrophic. Immune tolerance induction therapy has previously been the standard of care in eradicating inhibitors; however due to a multitude of factors, this may not be applicable in certain patients. The role of Rituximab is receiving more attention in this subset of patients. In this abstract, we report that treatment with Rituximab led to successful eradication of high-titer inhibitors in 3 patients with mild to moderate hemophilia A who developed inhibitors after receiving intensive treatment with recombinant Factor VIII (FVIII). Patient Characteristics: Three patients, aged 50–70, with baseline FVIII levels of 2–9%, developed inhibitors after recombinant Factor VIII infusion. Patient A was treated with continuous infusion FVIII for a post-surgical hemarthrosis for approximately 7 days. Patient B received bolus dose FVIII for a GI bleed for at least 10 days, and Patient C received bolus dose FVIII for knee replacement for 10 days. Factor VIII inhibitors were detected in these patients after one month. None of these patients had been treated with immune tolerance previously or had known inhibitors. Each patient received Rituximab 375mg/m2 every week for 4 weeks total. During and after treatment, FVIII levels and Bethesda inhibitor titers (BU) were monitored. Results: All three patients had eradication of their inhibitors (Figure 1) and return of their FVIII levels to baseline by six months post-treatment. Notably, patient C’s inhibitor peak was 117 BUs, 7 months prior to Rituximab treatment. Patient C’s initial response to Rituximab has been previously reported at ASH in abstract form. We now report that 4 years later, this patient has had a recurrence of his inhibitor after monoclonal FVIII for a contralateral knee replacement but with a peak titer of only 2 (Table 1). Inhibitor Trends after Rituximab Treatment Inhibitor Trends after Rituximab Treatment Bethesda Inhibitor Titer (BU) per Month (*) after Receiving Rituximab 0* 1 3 6 36 48 51 NA=Not applicable as data has not matured yet Patient A (BU) 5 0.7 0 0 NA NA NA Patient B (BU) 17 7 2 0 NA NA NA Patient C (BU) 40 4 0 0 0 2 0.5 Conclusion: Inhibitors in patients with mild-moderate hemophilia differ from those with severe FVIII deficiency, behaving more like the autoantibodies seen in patients with spontaneous FVIII inhibitors. In support of this idea, we successfully treated high titer inhibitors which developed in 3 patients with baseline FVIII levels of 2–9%. All three patients had prompt resolution of their inhibitor titers during the course of therapy, with return of their baseline FVIII levels. Historically, patients with mild-moderate hemophilia treated at the Harold R. Roberts Comprehensive Hemophilia Center at the University of North Carolina were treated either with immune tolerance induction or by bypass agents alone, with inhibitor eradication taking months to years (data not shown). While performance of larger prospective trials would be ideal, the small number of patients with this condition limits the ability to perform these trials. Our findings, in combination with other case series from other institutions, reveal a promising alternative for prompt and reliable treatment in mild-moderate hemophiliacs with inhibitors.

Most Factor VIII B Domain Missense Mutations Are Unlikely to Be Causative Mutations for Hemophilia A: Implications for Factor VIII Genetic Analysis

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 513-513
Author(s):  
Kyoichi Ogata ◽  
Steven W. Pipe
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Coagulation Factor ◽  
Causative Mutation ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Single Chain

Abstract Hemophilia A results from the quantitative or qualitative deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). FVIII is synthesized as a single-chain polypeptide of approximately 280 kDa with the domain structure A1-A2-B-A3-C1-C2. Whereas the A and C domains exhibit ~40% amino acid identity to each other and to the A and C domains of coagulation factor V, the B domain is not homologous to any known protein and is dispensable for FVIII cofactor activity. Missense mutations in the FVIII B domain have been described in patients with variable phenotypes of hemophilia A. According to the NCBI SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphism) database, 22 SNPs are reported within FVIII, 11 of which occur within the B domain. FVIII B domain variant D1241E has been reported as a missense mutation associated with mild or severe hemophilia A, yet this mutation is also present in the NCBI SNPs database. We hypothesize that D1241E and most other reported B domain missense mutations are not the causative mutation for hemophilia A in these patients but represent SNPs or otherwise non-pathologic mutations. To investigate this, we analyzed 7 B domain missense mutations that were previously found in hemophilia A patients (T751S, V993L, H1047Y, D1241E, T1353A, P1641L and S1669L). Comparative analysis showed that the amino acids at these positions are not conserved in all species and in some cases, the amino acid substitution reported in hemophilia patients is represented in the native sequence in other species. Analysis with PolyPhen Software showed that only H1047Y mutation was considered as “possibly damaging”, while the others were considered as “benign”. To investigate this further, we constructed seven plasmid vectors containing these B domain missense mutations. The synthesis and secretion of FVIII wild-type (WT) and these seven mutants were compared after transient DNA transfection into COS-1 monkey cells in vitro. Analysis of the FVIII clotting activity and antigen levels in the conditioned medium demonstrated that all mutants had FVIII activity and antigen levels similar to FVIII WT. Further, FVIII WT, H1047Y and D1241E mutants were introduced into a FVIII exon 16 knock-out mouse model of hemophilia A by hydrodynamic tailvein injection in vivo. The mouse plasma was analyzed at 24 hrs for activity and antigen expression. Mutants H1047Y and D1241E expressed at 211 mU/mL and 224 mU/mL activity with FVIII antigen levels of 97 ng/mL and 118 ng/mL, respectively, similar to FVIII WT. These results suggested that H1047Y and D1241E mutants did not lead to impairments in secretion or functional activity. We conclude that most missense mutations within the FVIII B domain would be unlikely to lead to severe hemophilia A and that the majority of such missense mutations represent polymorphisms or non-pathologic mutations. Investigators should search for additional potentially causative mutations elsewhere within the FVIII gene when B domain missense mutations are identified.

A Subset of High Titer Acquired Hemophilia Patients May Benefit from Treatment with High Dose Factor VIII.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3476-3476
Author(s):  
Shannon Meeks ◽  
John F Healey ◽  
Ernest T Parker ◽  
Pete Lollar
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
High Titer ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Type I ◽  
C2 Domain ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Acquired Hemophilia ◽  
Proteolytic Activation

Abstract Abstract 3476 Poster Board III-413 Approximately 30% of patients with severe hemophilia A will develop inhibitory antibodies (Abs) to factor VIII (fVIII inhibitors). The immune response to fVIII currently is the most significant complication in the management of patients with hemophilia A. In addition, autoimmune Abs to fVIII can develop in non-hemophiliacs, producing acquired hemophilia A, which frequently produces life- or limb-threatening bleeding. Patients with autoimmune hemophilia often have Abs with type II kinetics in which there is incomplete inactivation of fVIII at saturating concentrations of inhibitor. We have characterized the antibody response to the C2 domain of human fVIII in a murine hemophilia model and described 5 structural groups of Abs. Groups A, AB, and B are classical anti-C2 Abs that block fVIII and fVIIIa binding to phospholipid. Groups BC and C consist of non-classical anti-C2 Abs that inhibit the proteolytic activation of fVIII but do not block the binding of fVIII to phospholipid. Subsequently, we identified classical and non-classical anti-C2 Abs in human fVIII inhibitor plasmas. Most murine non-classical Abs have inhibitor titers greater than 10,000 Bethesda units/mg IgG. In a murine in vivo bleeding model, both type I classical C2 Abs, type II non-classical C2 Abs, and a type I anti-A2 Ab produced similar amounts of blood loss that were significantly greater than control mice injected with 180 U/kg of fVIII alone. Increasing the dose of fVIII to 360 U/kg overcame the bleeding diathesis produced by the type II MAbs, but not the type I Abs. These results were consistent with the in vitro Bethesda assay in which a type I anti-A2 Ab, 4A4, completely inhibited both 1 U/mL and 3 U/mL fVIII, while there was 40% residual activity at saturating concentrations of a type II anti-C2 Ab, 2-77, at either concentration of fVIII. To determine if similar in vitro characteristics exist in patients with acquired hemophilia, plasmas from 3 patients with high titer type II inhibitors were studied. All 3 plasmas primarily had C2 domain epitope specificity that included non-classical Abs. Plasma A7 additionally had detectable anti-A2 activity. Recovery of fVIII activity after a 2 h incubation at 37 °C at nominal added concentrations of 1 mL and 3 U/mL fVIII was compared (Table 1). At 3 U/mL added fVIII, recovery of activity in plasmas A4 and A5 was 1.1 U/mL and 0.51 U/mL, respectively, despite the presence of inhibitor titers of 18 and 11 Bethesda units (BU) per mL. The presence of anti-A2 Abs, which typically have type I kinetics, may have contributed to the overall lower recovery of activity in plasma A7. These results suggest that treatment with high-dose fVIII rather than bypassing agents may be warranted in patients with an inhibitor response dominated by non-classical anti-C2 Abs. Table 1 Patient Plasma Inhibitor Titer (BU/mL) Recovered Activity at 1U/mL FVIII (U/mL) Recovered Activity at 3 U/mL FVIII (U/mL) A4 18 0.31 1.1 A5 11 0.18 0.51 A7 62 0.07 0.12 Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Pharmacokinetics of Continuous Infusion Therapy of Factor VIII Concentrates in Hemophilia A Patients with Inhibitors,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3320-3320
Author(s):  
Katsumi Nishiya ◽  
Ichiro Tanaka ◽  
Keiji Nogami ◽  
Kenichi Ogiwara ◽  
Koji Yada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Infusion Rate ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
High Titer ◽  
Infusion Therapy ◽  
Target Level ◽  
Ci Therapy ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Abstract 3320 Continuous infusion (CI) of factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates is aimed at maintaining a steady hemostatic level of FVIII activity (FVIII:C) in hemophilia A patients during various surgeries. However, there are few reports that mentioned the difference of pharmacokinetics of CI therapy in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors. We investigated the relationship between the FVIII:C levels and the rate of CI, and the difference of clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vd) of FVIII in hemophilia A patients with/without inhibitors. 8 severe hemophilia A patients without inhibitors (arthroscopic synovectomy; 4 cases, total knee arthroplasty; 2 cases, total nephrectomy; 1 case, partial hepatectomy; 1 case), 3 patients with low-titer (2.0–2.9 BU) inhibitors and 3 patients with high-titer (6.0–9.0 BU) inhibitors (insertion or removal of a central venous access device), were enrolled in this study between 2005 and 2010. According to the Japanese guideline for hemophilia treatment, we should do CI therapy to keep target level 80–100% for 5–10 days for joint surgery and other major surgeries. An initial bolus infusion (BI) of FVIII concentrates was administered to achieve this level prior to CI. In addition, we have to neutralize the inhibitors by FVIII concentrates in case of the patients with inhibitors. FVIII:C was measured using one-stage clotting assays and FVIII inhibitor assays were performed using the Bethesda method. All therapy was conducted after obtaining fully informed consent. The median FVIII:C level after BI was 120.2% (range: 90–150) in the patients without inhibitors, 72.0% (range: 68–160) with low-titer inhibitors, and 20.0% (range: 9.4–30) with high-titer inhibitors, respectively. The target level of FVIII:C was adjusted to approximately 100%. The initial infusion rate was 3.7 U/kg/hr (range: 2.2–5.0), 8.3 U/kg/hr (range: 8.0–8.5) and 18.5 U/kg/hr (range: 15–22), respectively. After adjustment for the target level, the final infusion rate decreased to 2.6 U/kg/hr (range: 1.5–5.4), 4.7 U/kg/hr (range: 3.0–5.6) and 8.0 U/kg/hr (range: 7.0–9.0), respectively. CL was 2.3 ml/hr/kg (range: 1.5–3.9), 4.0 ml/hr/kg (range: 2.3–5.1) and 9.3 ml/hr/kg (range: 9.0–9.6), respectively. Vd was 0.04 L/kg (range: 0.031–0.047), 0.18 L/kg (range: 0.12–0.29) and 1.54 L/kg (range: 0.95–2.43), respectively. No unexpected safety concerns associated with CI, such as thrombosis, was identified during the study. On CI therapy, we could keep target level of the patients without inhibitors and with low-titer inhibitors easier than those with high-titer inhibitors. One of the reason is that CL and Vd in patients with inhibitors are higher than those in patients without inhibitors. CI with appropriate monitoring of FVIII:C level and concerning CL and Vd forms a safe method for perioperative care in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document