Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Fundoplications in Pediatric Surgery: Experience Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (02) ◽  
pp. 173-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Fourcade ◽  
Sarah Amar ◽  
Khalid Alzahrani ◽  
Ann-Rose Cook ◽  
Karim Braïk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Learning Curve ◽  
Pediatric Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Postoperative Rehabilitation ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Open Procedure ◽  
The Mean

Introduction Laparoscopic fundoplicature for gastroesophageal reflux disease has become the gold standard because of the improvement of postoperative rehabilitation compared with the open procedure. The robot-assisted surgery has brought new advantages for the patient and the surgeon compared with laparoscopy. We studied this new approach and the learning curve. Materials and Methods Sixty robot-assisted fundoplicatures were performed in two university pediatric surgery centers. Data of the patients were recorded, including peroperative data (operation length and complications), postoperative recoveries, and clinical evolution. The learning curve was evaluated retrospectively and each variable was compared along this learning curve. Results We observed a flattening of the learning curve after the 20th case for one surgeon. The mean operative time decreased significantly to 80 ± 10 minutes after 20 cases. There were no conversions to an open procedure. A revision surgery was indicated for 4.7% of the patients by a surgical robot-assisted laparoscopic approach. Conclusion The robotic system appears to add many advantages for surgical ergonomic procedures. There is a potential benefit in operating time with a short technical apprenticeship period. The setting up system is easy with a short docking time.

scholarly journals Operative and Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Living-Donor Surgery on Uterus Transplantation: A Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 349
Author(s):  
Yusuke Matoba ◽  
Iori Kisu ◽  
Kouji Banno ◽  
Daisuke Aoki
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Living Donor ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Uterus Transplantation ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Deceased Donors

Background: The surgical approach and choice of drainage veins for uterus transplantation living-donor surgery have been investigated to reduce invasiveness. Methods: A thorough search of the PubMed database was conducted. The search was not limited by language or date of publication. The data were collected on 13 October 2020. Two reviewers independently assessed each article and determined eligibility for inclusion in the review article. Inclusion criteria were English peer-reviewed articles reporting surgical information or postoperative course, articles regarding animal research on UTx, UTx on deceased donors, or not original articles. Results: Of the 51 operations within 26 articles reviewed, the mean operative time was shortest in the laparoscopic approach, and longest in the robot-assisted approach. The mean blood loss was less in the laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches than in the open approach. In cases where the uterine veins were not preserved, the mean operative time was shortened by each approach and the mean blood loss decreased with the laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches. Conclusions: These procedures may contribute to less invasive living-donor surgery.

scholarly journals Open and laparoscopic approaches are associated with comparable 90-day morbidity and mortality following ERAS protocol

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhavin B. Vasavada ◽  
Hardik Patel
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Morbidity Rate ◽  
Blood Products ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Eras Protocol

ABSTRACTIntroductionThe aim of this study is to compare 90-day mortality and morbidity between open and laparoscopic surgeries performed in one centre since the introduction of ERAS protocols.Material and MethodsAll gastrointestinal surgeries performed between April 2016 and March 2019 at our institution after the introduction of ERAS protocols have been analysed for morbidity and mortality. The analysis was performed in a retrospective manner using data from our prospectively maintained database.ResultsWe performed 245 gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary surgeries between April 2016 and March 2019. The mean age of patients was 50.96 years. 135 were open surgeries and 110 were laparoscopic surgeries. The mean ASA score was 2.4, the mean operative time was 111 minutes and the mean CDC grade of surgery was 2.56. 40 were emergency surgeries and 205 were elective surgeries. Overall the 90-day mortality rate was 8.5% and the morbidity rate was around 9.79%. On univariate analysis morbidity was associated with a higher CDC grade of surgeries, a higher ASA grade, longer operating time, the use of more blood products, a longer hospital stay and open surgeries. HPB surgeries and luminal surgeries (non hpb gastrointestinal surgeries) were associated with 90 day post operative morbidity. On multivariate analysis no factors independently predicted morbidity. On univariate analysis 90-day mortality was predicted by the grade of surgeries, a higher ASA grade, longer operative time, the use of more blood products, open surgeries and emergency surgeries. However on multivariate analysis only the use of more blood products was independently associated with mortalityConclusionThe 90-day mortality and morbidity rates between open and laparoscopic surgeries after the introduction of ERAS protocol were similar.

scholarly journals The Revolving Door Flap: Revisiting an Elegant but Forgotten Flap for Ear Defect Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (01) ◽  
pp. 064-070
Author(s):  
Anupam Golash ◽  
Sudipta Bera ◽  
Aditya V. Kanoi ◽  
Abhijit Golash
Keyword(s):  
Learning Curve ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Senior Author ◽  
Revolving Door ◽  
Harvest Technique ◽  
Flap Design ◽  
Mean Dimension ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background The revolving door flap, although well described in the literature, is not widely used in general plastic surgery practice. The flap has been used for anterior auricular and conchal defects and is considered elegant for its unique flap design and peculiarity of flap harvest. However, due to its use for a very specific purpose and unique flap harvest technique that may be difficult to grasp, the flap is not very popular in reconstructive practice. Objectives This study aims to evaluate the understanding and learning curve of the revolving door flap, assess surgical outcome, and reemphasize its utility and elegance in reconstruction of ear defects. Methodology This is a case series of nine surgeries performed between January 2014 and 2018. Three cases were performed by the senior author and six cases by two junior authors. Patients were observed for complications and aesthetic outcomes. Results The mean dimension of the flaps was 27.22 mm × 22.78 mm. The mean operative time was 56.56 minutes (standard deviation 22.50, standard error of the mean 7.5). Flap congestion was noted in three cases postoperatively which resolved completely by the second week. Major “pinning” of the ear was noted in four cases. Conclusion Though infrequently performed, the revolving door flap has an easy learning curve once the proper harvest technique and flap movement has been grasped. The flap harvest is convenient, safe, and yields predictable results. Not only is total or partial flap loss extremely rare, the flap is sensate, color match is good, auricular contour is maintained, and the donor site can be closed primarily and remains well hidden.

O100 WORLDWIDE TECHNIQUES AND OUTCOMES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY (RAMIE): RESULTS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL UGIRA REGISTRY

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
B F Kingma ◽  
P P Grimminger ◽  
M J van Det ◽  
Y K Chao ◽  
P Chiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Radical Resection ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Cardiac Complications ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to gain insight in the techniques and outcomes of RAMIE worldwide. Background & Methods Although robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is increasingly adopted. The current literature on RAMIE mainly consists of single-center case series with considerable variation in reported techniques and outcomes. To gain an overview of the worldwide practice in RAMIE, an online registry was established by the Upper GI International Robotic Association (UGIRA). The collected data involve patient- and treatment characteristics, as well as postoperative outcomes that include complications as defined by the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group, length of stay, re-admissions (i.e. <30 days after discharge), mortality (i.e. in-hospital or <30 days after surgery), and pathological results. The outcomes were descriptively analyzed for this interim report. Results A total of 434 patients who underwent RAMIE for esophageal cancer between 2016-2019 were included in this interim analysis. The mean age was 63 years (SD ±9.7), the majority was male (n=359, 83%), and nearly all patients had an ASA score ≥2 (n=398, 92%). Adenocarcinoma (n=253, 58%) and squamous cell carcinoma (n=162, 37%) were most prevalent. The usual surgical approach was transthoracic (n=428, 99%) with the patient in semiprone position (n=393, 91%). Gastric conduit reconstruction was performed in all except one patient, who received a colonic interposition. The anastomosis was created by hand-sewing (n=207, 48%), circular stapling (n=142, 32%), or linear stapling (n=85, 20%). The median intraoperative blood loss was 120 milliliters (IQR 70-280) and the median operating time was 392 minutes (IQR 353-455). Postoperative complications occurred in 251 patients (59%) and mainly involved pulmonary complications (n=138, 32%), anastomotic leakage (n=80, 18%), and cardiac complications (n=55, 13%). Mortality occurred in 9 patients (2%) and re-admission because of complications was required in 57 patients (14%). A median of 28 lymph nodes (IQR 21-35) were removed and a radical resection was achieved in 400 patients (92%). Conclusion The presented results are the first to provide an overview of the techniques that are commonly used in RAMIE. By demonstrating results that are in line with recent benchmarking literature, this study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of RAMIE.

scholarly journals 1019 Quantified Learning Curves for Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Huttman ◽  
M Kiandee ◽  
R Lawrence ◽  
L Paynter ◽  
S Lawday ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Gastrointestinal Surgery ◽  
Learning Curves ◽  
Descriptive Statistics ◽  
Setup Times ◽  
Control Procedure ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Aim Robotic techniques are increasingly being adopted by gastrointestinal surgeons. It is important to understand the learning curves (LCs) for robotic surgery, to protect patients from harm caused by surgeon inexperience. The aim of this study was to summarise reports of the LC for three robotic gastrointestinal procedures: cholecystectomy, oesophagectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Method Three systematic reviews were conducted by the trainee led RoboSurg Collaborative. Systematic searches identified reports of primary clinical research involving robotic cholecystectomy, oesophagectomy and RYGB. Articles were screened in duplicate by title, abstract and then full text. References to the LC were extracted and coded. Quantifications of the learning curve were summarised using descriptive statistics. Results 259 articles were identified: 56 measured the LC, with 23 (9%) of these calculating the number of cases required to complete the LC. The mean reported number of cases at which the LC plateaued was: 16 for oesophagectomy (N = 6, SD = 3.7), 18 for cholecystectomy (N = 5, SD = 15.1), 34 for RYGB (N = 12, SD = 24.6). The reported LCs often incorporated equipment setup times, and so represents learning of the team as well as the surgeon. These values represent points on the LC that authors deemed their surgeons to have ‘completed’ learning. Definitions for when these points occurred varied greatly but largely fell in to two categories: ‘plateau of operative time’ or ‘matching operating time of laparoscopic control procedure’. Conclusions The heterogeneity in how LCs are defined, measured, and reported highlights the need for a more standardised approach when evaluating novel techniques such as robotics.

scholarly journals Remnant gall bladder and cystic duct stump stone after cholecystectomy: tertiary multicenter experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 3478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir A. A. Mageed ◽  
Mohammed A. Omar ◽  
Alaa A. Redwan
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Cystic Duct ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Biliary Injury ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Biliary Pain ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Experienced Team

Background: There is no doubt that cholecystectomy relieves pre-surgical symptoms of gallbladder (GB) disease. The persistence of symptoms mainly biliary pain was recorded in 10 - 20% of cases, with variety of causes. Residual GB/cystic duct stump stone is one of the most important un-expected cause. The present study was conducted to study and evaluate those patients, with their surgical treatment.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 27 cases with residual GB/cystic duct stump stone. The diagnosis was guided by ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography. All cases were managed by using completion cholecystectomy - either open or laparoscopic. All preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were collected.Results: Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography and papillotomy were required in 13 patients whom were presented with obstructive jaundice. Open completion cholecystectomy techniques were done in the majority of cases (21 patients) while laparoscopic approach was feasible in only 6 cases with one conversion (1/6). The mean operative time was (89.57 ± 12.05 and 118.16 ± 12.6 min), and the mean blood loss was (195.5 ± 19.22 and 187.5 ± 23.61 ml) respectively. Intra-operative minor biliary injury occurred in two cases and repaired instantaneously. The mean hospital stay was (4.76 ± 2.81 and 2.33 ± 1.32 days) respectively. All patients were reported to be symptom-free at the follow-up after surgical treatment.Conclusions: Residual GB/cystic duct stump stone is a preventable and correctable cause of post-cholecystectomy complaint. Completion cholecystectomy is a proven treatment of choice to relieve symptoms and avoid complications; furthermore, it can be carried out laparoscopically with experienced team and facilities in spite of difficulties.

scholarly journals Outcome of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy during initial learning curve versus laparotomy

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiangjiao Zhou ◽  
Heng Zou ◽  
Li Xiong ◽  
Xiongying Miao ◽  
Zhongtao Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Extensive Experience ◽  
Curve Versus ◽  
Initial Learning ◽  
Cusum Method ◽  
Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Abstract Background : To analyze the initial learning curve (LC) for robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RAPD) and compare RAPD during the initial LC with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) in terms of outcome. Methods : This study is a retrospective review of patients who consecutively underwent RAPD between October 2015 and May 2019 in our hospital. Experiences from 30 initial consecutive RAPD cases, considered the initial LC of a single surgeon team, were compared with those from laparotomy cases during the same period in terms of outcome. Preoperative demographic and comorbidity data were obtained. Perioperative data on operation time, blood transfusion, numbers of harvested lymph nodes, 90-day mortality and readmission, surgery-related complications, postoperative hospital stay, and total costs were acquired for analysis. The operation time for RAPD was evaluated using the cumulative sum(CUSUM) method. Results : Seventy-eight patients, including 30 consecutive RAPD cases and 48 consecutive open cases, were enrolled for review. The demographic and comorbidity characteristics of the two groups were similar. Compared with OPD, RAPD required a significantly longer operative time (423.67 ± 137.627 min vs. 228.75 ± 44.988 min, P < 0.001) and higher cost (185700 ± 54500 RMB vs. 120600 ± 41700 RMB, P < 0.001). Moreover, compared with the OPD group, the RAPD group revealed a significantly smaller mean number of lymph nodes harvested in malignant cases (8.72 ± 4.9 vs 14.26 ± 7.633, P = 0.007). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of incidence of Clavien–Dindo grade III–V morbidities and 90-day mortality and readmission. In the CUSUM graph, one peak point was observed at the 8th case, after which the operation time began to decrease. Conclusions : RAPD is safe when performed in well-selected patients by well-trained teams with extensive experience in open pancreaticoduodenectomy during the initial LC,and the LC of RAPD may be shorten less than 30 cases.

scholarly journals A structured training pathway to implement robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: the learning curve results from a high-volume center

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Feike Kingma ◽  
Edin Hadzijusufovic ◽  
Pieter C Van der Sluis ◽  
Erida Bano ◽  
Hauke Lang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Learning Curves ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
High Volume Center

ABSTRACT To ensure safe implementation of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE), the learning process should be optimized. This study aimed to report the results of a surgeon who implemented RAMIE in a German high-volume center by following a tailored and structured training pathway that involved proctoring. Consecutive patients who underwent RAMIE during the course of the program were included from a prospective database. A single surgeon, who had prior experience in conventional MIE, performed all RAMIE procedures. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) learning curves were plotted for the thoracic operating time and intraoperative blood loss. Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients who underwent surgery before and after a learning curve plateau occurred. Between 2017 and 2018, the adopting center adhered to the structured training pathway, and a total of 70 patients were included in the analysis. The CUSUM learning curves showed plateaus after 22 cases. In consecutive cases 23 to 70, the operating time was shorter for both the thoracic phase (median 215 vs. 249 minutes, P = 0.001) and overall procedure (median 394 vs. 440 minutes, P = 0.005), intraoperative blood loss was less (median 210 vs. 400 milliliters, P = 0.029), and lymph node yield was higher (median 32 vs. 23 nodes, P = 0.001) when compared to cases 1 to 22. No significant differences were found in terms of conversion rates, postoperative complications, length of stay, completeness of resection, or mortality. In conclusion, the structured training pathway resulted in a short and safe learning curve for RAMIE in this single center’s experience. As the pathway seems effective in implementing RAMIE without compromising the early oncological outcomes and complication rates, it is advised for surgeons who are wanting to adopt this technique.

Robotic and Laparoscopic Approaches for Adrenal Surgery in Obese Patients

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482095149
Author(s):  
Hosam Shalaby ◽  
Mohamed Abdelgawad ◽  
Mahmoud Omar, MD ◽  
Ghassan Zora, MD ◽  
Saad Alawwad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Adrenal Surgery ◽  
Robotic Approach ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Objective Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is a challenging procedure in obese patients. Few recent studies have advocated against robot-assisted adrenalectomy, particularly in obese patients. This study aims to compare operative outcomes between the robotic and laparoscopic adrenalectomy, particularly in obese patients. Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on all consecutive patients undergoing adrenalectomy for benign disease by a single surgeon using either a laparoscopic or robotic approach. Adrenal surgeries for adrenal cancer were excluded. Demographics, operative time, length of hospital stays, estimated blood loss (EBL), and intraoperative and postoperative complications were evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups; obese and nonobese. A sub-analysis was performed comparing robotic and laparoscopic approaches in obese and nonobese patients. Results Out of 120, 55 (45.83%) were obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2). 14 (25.45%) of the obese patients underwent a laparoscopic approach, and 41 (74.55%) underwent a robotic approach. Operative times were longer in the obese vs. nonobese groups (173.30 ± 72.90 minutes and 148.20 ± 61.68 minutes, P = .04) and were associated with less EBL (53.77 ± 82.48 vs. 101.30 ± 122, P = .01). The robotic approach required a longer operative time when compared to the laparoscopic approach (187 ± 72.42 minutes vs. 126.60 ± 54.55 minutes, P = .0102) in the obese but was associated with less blood loss (29.02 ± 51.05 mL vs. 138.30 ± 112.20 mL, P < .01) and shorter hospital stay (1.73 ± 1.23 days vs. 3.17 ± 1.27 days, P < .001). Conclusion Robot-assisted adrenal surgery is safe in obese patients and appears to be longer; however, it provides improvements in postoperative outcomes, including EBL and shorter hospital stay.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document