Immunosuppression: Have We Learnt Anything?

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (02) ◽  
pp. 172-180
Author(s):  
Ramsey Hachem

AbstractOutcomes after lung transplantation remain disappointing because there is a high incidence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), which typically follows a progressive clinical course and often results in allograft failure and death. Chronic rejection is considered the predominant cause of CLAD. Thus, optimal immunosuppression has been viewed as having the potential to prevent CLAD and improve survival after lung transplantation. Numerous clinical trials have been conducted investigating the efficacy and safety of various immunosuppressive agents. Many studies have been small and single-center clinical trials but some have been international and multicenter trials enrolling more than 300 patients. This review focuses on clinical trials of immunosuppression conducted in lung transplantation and points out strengths and limitations of the various studies. Ultimately, the findings of these clinical trials explain the current state of practice in lung transplantation and identify gaps in knowledge that require additional study. Finally, there is an ongoing need for carefully designed and conducted clinical trials to improve clinical practice and outcomes after lung transplantation.

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-45
Author(s):  
Emanuela Martina ◽  
Federico Diotallevi ◽  
Tommaso Bianchelli ◽  
Matteo Paolinelli ◽  
Annamaria Offidani

Background: Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) is a disease characterized by the onset of wheals and/or angioedema over 6 weeks. The pathophysiology for CSU is very complex, involving mast cells and basophils with a multitude of inflammatory mediators. For many years the treatment of CSU has been based on the use of antihistamines, steroids and immunosuppressive agents with inconstant and frustrating results. The introduction of omalizumab, the only licensed biologic for antihistamine- refractory CSU, has changed the management of the disease. Objective: The aim of this article is to review the current state of the art of CSU, the real-life experience with omalizumab and the promising drugs that are under development. Methods:: An electronic search was performed to identify studies, case reports, guidelines and reviews focused on the new targets for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria, both approved or under investigation. The search was limited to articles published in peer-reviewed journals in the English Language in the PubMed database and trials registered in Clinicaltrials.gov. Results:: Since the advent of omalizumab, the search for new therapies for chronic spontaneous urticaria has had a new impulse. Anti-IgE drugs will probably still be the cornerstone of therapy, but new targets may prove effective in syndromic urticaria or refractory cases. Conclusion:: Although omalizumab has been a breakthrough in the treatment of CSU, many patients do not completely get benefit and even require more effective treatments. Novel drugs are under investigation with promising results.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingxia Wang ◽  
Guanqi Wang ◽  
Haiyan Ma ◽  
Baoen Shan

Introduction: Crizotinib was approved to treat anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by the Food and Drug Administration in 2011.We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials and retrospective studies to compare the efficacy and safety of crizotinib with chemotherapy. </P><P> Methods: We searched electronic databases from inception to Dec. 2016. Clinical trials and retrospective studies regarding crizotinib and crizotinib versus chemotherapy in treatment of NSCLC were eligible. The primary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Results: Nine studies (five clinical trials and four retrospective studies) including 729 patients met the inclusion criteria. Crizotinib treatment revealed 1-year OS of 77.1% and PFS of 9.17 months. And crizotinib had a better performance than chemotherapy in ORR (OR: 4.97, 95%CI: 3.16 to 7.83, P<0.00001, I2=35%). DCR revealed superiority with crizotinib than chemotherapy (OR: 3.42, 95% CI: 2.33 to 5.01, P<0.00001, I2=0%). PR (partial response) were significant superior to that of chemotherapy through direct systematic review. No statistically significant difference in CR (complete response) was found between crizotinib-treated group and chemotherapy-treated group. Regarding SD (stable disease), chemotherapy-treated group had a better performance than crizotinib-treated group. Common adverse events associated with crizotinib were visual disorder, gastrointestinal side effects, and elevated liver aminotransferase levels, whereas common adverse events with chemotherapy were fatigue, nausea, and hematologic toxicity. This systematic review revealed improved objective response rate and increased disease control rate in crizotinib group comparing with chemotherapy group. Crizotinib treatment would be a favorable treatment option for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. ALK inhibitors may have future potential applications in other cancers driven by ALK or c-MET gene mutations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-34
Author(s):  
Cheyenne E. Allenby ◽  
Eric S. Babiash ◽  
Patrick N. Blank ◽  
Marco D. Carpenter ◽  
Isabelle G. Lee ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Puneet S. Garcha ◽  
Jose F. Santacruz ◽  
Michael S. Machuzak ◽  
Marie M. Budev ◽  
Atul Mehta

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document