scholarly journals Comparison of Direct Surgical Costs for Proximal Row Carpectomy and Four-Corner Arthrodesis

2018 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 066-071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Stephens ◽  
Angela Presson ◽  
Yizhe Xu ◽  
Ross Feller ◽  
Andrew Tyser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Proximal Row Carpectomy ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Surgical Costs ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Simultaneous Procedures ◽  
Supply Costs ◽  
Staple Fixation

Background Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) and four-corner arthrodesis (FCA) are common treatments for stage II scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrists, with similar functional and patient-reported outcomes reported in the peer-reviewed literature. Questions Study questions included (1) whether surgical encounter total direct costs (SETDCs) differ between PRC and FCA, and (2) whether SETDC differs by method of fixation for FCA. Patients and Methods Consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years) undergoing PRC and FCA between July 2011 and May 2017 at a single tertiary care academic institution were identified. Patients undergoing additional simultaneous procedures were excluded. Using our institution's information technology value tools, we extracted prospectively collected cost data for each surgical encounter. SETDCs were compared between PRC and FCA, and between FCA subgroups (screws, plating, or staples). Results Of 42 included patients, mean age was similar between the 23 PRC and 19 FCA patients (51.2 vs. 54.5 years, respectively). SETDCs were significantly greater for FCA than PRC by 425%. FCA involved significantly greater facility costs (2.3-fold), supply costs (10-fold), and operative time (121 vs. 57 minutes). Implant costs were absent for PRC, which were responsible for 55% of the SETDC for FCA. Compared with compression screws, plating and staple fixation were significantly more costly (70% and 240% greater, respectively). Conclusion SETDCs were 425% greater for FCA than PRC. Implant costs for FCA alone were 130% greater than the entire surgical encounter for PRC. For FCA, SETDC varied depending on the method of fixation. Level of Evidence This is a level III, cost analysis study.

Patient-reported outcomes of carpal tunnel release surgery in patients with bilateral severe carpal tunnel syndrome

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 932-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Q. Y. Tang ◽  
S. W. H. Lai ◽  
S. C. Tay
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Complete Resolution ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery

This retrospective study examined whether the presenting complaint of numbness is relieved post-operatively in severe carpal tunnel syndrome and also assessed any correlation between outcomes of the first and second procedures in staged bilateral carpal tunnel releases. Carpal tunnel release (60 open and 38 endoscopic) was done in 49 patients with bilateral severe carpal tunnel syndrome. There was complete resolution of numbness post-operatively in 77% ( n = 75) of hands. The median post-operative time before complete resolution of numbness was 21 days (IQR 8 to 21; range 3 to 482). The likelihood of complete resolution of symptoms after the second carpal tunnel release in patients with complete resolution of symptoms after the first carpal tunnel release was 22 (95% CI: 4 to 131) times that of the likelihood of improvement in patients with incomplete resolution of symptoms after the first carpal tunnel release. Level of evidence: IV

scholarly journals Sex differences in outcomes after arthroscopic bankart repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000965
Author(s):  
Natalie A Lowenstein ◽  
Peter J Ostergaard ◽  
Daniel B Haber ◽  
Kirsten D Garvey ◽  
Elizabeth G Matzkin
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Sex Differences ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Strength Function ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Males And Females

ObjectivesRisk factors for anterior shoulder dislocation include young age, contact activities and male sex. The influence of sex on patient-reported outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) is unclear, with few studies reporting potential differences. This study’s purpose was to compare patient-reported outcomes of males and females following ABR.MethodsProspectively collected data was analysed for 281 patients (males: 206, females: 75) after ABR with preoperative, 1-year and 2-year follow-up responses. The Wilcoxon signed-rank and χ2 tests, preoperative, 1 year and 2 year follow-up results were examined to determine differences of scores in males versus females.ResultsNo statistically significant sex differences were observed in Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) or Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) Scores at 1-year or 2-year follow-up. Females had lower Veterans RAND 12-item health survey (VR-12) mental health subscores at 2-year follow-up (females: 52.3±9.0, males: 55.8±7.6, p=0.0016). Females were more likely to report that treatment had ‘exceeded expectations’ at 2-year follow-up regarding motion, strength, function and normal sports activities.ConclusionResults of study demonstrate that ABR has similar outcomes for both males and females. There were no statistically significant sex-related differences in SST, ASES, VAS or SANE scores following ABR. VR-12 mental health subscores showed a minimal difference at 2-year follow-up, with lower scores in females.Level of evidenceRetrospective cohort study; level II.

scholarly journals PROMIS and FAAM Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Foot and Ankle Orthopedics

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Man Hung ◽  
Judith F. Baumhauer ◽  
Frank W. Licari ◽  
Maren W. Voss ◽  
Jerry Bounsanga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Minimum Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Diagnostic Study ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Meaningful Change ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Level I

Background: Establishing score points that reflect meaningful change from the patient perspective is important for interpreting patient-reported outcomes. This study estimated the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) values of 2 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Sports subscale within a foot and ankle orthopedic population. Methods: Patients seen for foot and ankle conditions at an orthopedic clinic were administered the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) v1.2, the PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) v1.1, and the FAAM Sports at baseline and all follow-up visits. MCID estimation was conducted using anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Results: A total of 3069 patients, mean age of 51 years (range = 18-94), were included. The MCIDs for the PROMIS PF ranged from approximately 3 to 30 points (median = 11.3) depending on the methods being used. The MCIDs ranged from 3 to 25 points (median = 8.9) for the PROMIS PI, and from 9 to 77 points (median = 32.5) for the FAAM Sports. Conclusions: This study established a range of MCIDs in the PROMIS PF, PROMIS PI, and FAAM Sports indicating meaningful change in patient condition. MCID values were consistent across follow-up periods, but were different across methods. Values below the 25th percentile of MCIDs may be useful for low-risk clinical decisions. Midrange values (eg, near the median) should be used for high stakes decisions in clinical practice (ie, surgery referrals). The MCID values within the interquartile range should be utilized for most decision making. Level of Evidence: Level I, diagnostic study, testing of previously developed diagnostic measure on consecutive patients with reference standard applied.

Arthroscopic ligament-specific repair for triangular fibrocartilage complex foveal avulsions: a minimum 2-year follow-up study

2020 ◽  
pp. 175319342095790
Author(s):  
Bo Liu ◽  
Margareta Arianni ◽  
Feiran Wu
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex ◽  
Wrist Flexion ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Triangular Fibrocartilage ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Viable Method

This study reports the arthroscopic ligament-specific repair of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) that anatomically restores both the volar and dorsal radioulnar ligaments into their individual foveal footprints. Twenty-five patients underwent arthroscopic ligament-specific repair with clinical and radiological diagnoses of TFCC foveal avulsions. The mean age was 28 years (range 14–47) and the mean follow-up was 31 months (range 24–47). Following arthroscopic assessment, 20 patients underwent double limb radioulnar ligament repairs and five had single limb repairs. At final follow-up, there were significant improvements in wrist flexion–extension, forearm pronation–supination and grip strength. There were also significant improvements in pain and patient-reported outcomes as assessed by the patient-rated wrist evaluation, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and modified Mayo wrist scores. Arthroscopic ligament-specific repair of the TFCC does not require specialist dedicated equipment or consumables and offers a viable method of treating these injuries. Level of evidence: IV

scholarly journals Functional outcomes after salvage procedures for the destroyed wrist: an overview

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel E. H. Boeckstyns
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Salvage Procedure ◽  
Proximal Row Carpectomy ◽  
Wrist Arthrodesis ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Surgical Options ◽  
The Common ◽  
Clinical Measurements

The most widely used procedures for salvaging a destroyed wrist are four-corner arthrodesis, radiocarpal arthrodesis, proximal row carpectomy, total wrist arthrodesis, and total wrist replacement or resurfacing. The purpose of this article is to give an overview of the functional results obtained with the various salvage procedures and of the common methods for assessing the surgical outcomes. The outcomes are assessed by clinical measurements and scoring methods, but the actual functional status and well-being of the patients should be presented together with patient-reported outcomes. No salvage procedure can restore entirely full wrist function. Understanding indications, risks, and the outcomes of these procedures would favour a better decision for surgery and help choose the proper treatment from among the surgical options discussed with patients.

The influence of skin tears following collagenase treatment of Dupuytren’s disease on treatment outcomes

2020 ◽  
pp. 175319342094132
Author(s):  
Robert Phan ◽  
Warren M. Rozen ◽  
Giselle Dela Cruz ◽  
Vicky Tobin ◽  
David J. Hunter-Smith
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Dupuytren’S Disease ◽  
Extension Deficit ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Dupuytren's Disease ◽  
Finger Extension ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Collagenase Injection ◽  
Skin Tears ◽  
Pre Treatment

This study investigated influence of skin tears on patient-reported outcomes of injection of collagenase clostridium histolyticum for Dupuytren’s disease and association between extension deficit of digits before injection and skin tear after the injection. From 2016 to 2018, 391 Dupuytren’s cords were treated in 184 patients in a prospective cohort study and the patients were evaluated before injection and six months after injection. Skin tears occurred in 50% of these patients. We found no significant differences in the patient-reported outcomes between patients with or without skin tears. A higher extension deficit before treatment was associated with significantly increased frequency of skin tears. We conclude that the incidence of skin tears after injection does not affect patient reported outcomes six months after collagenase injection, but the incidence of skin tears is significantly associated with the severity of pre-treatment finger extension deficits. Level of evidence: II

scholarly journals Articular Cartilage Defects of the Glenohumeral Joint: A Systematic Review of Treatment Options and Outcomes

Cartilage ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 194760351987085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Fiegen ◽  
Devin P. Leland ◽  
Christopher D. Bernard ◽  
Aaron J. Krych ◽  
Jonathan D. Barlow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Glenohumeral Joint ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Cartilage Defects ◽  
Imaging Findings ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported

Objective To report radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings, patient-reported outcomes, and complications and/or reoperations following nonarthroplasty surgical intervention for focal glenohumeral cartilage defects. Design A literature search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Patients were included if they possessed a chondral defect of the humeral head, glenoid, or both, which had been treated with a joint preserving nonarthroplasty procedure. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies scoring system. Study demographics, surgical technique, imaging findings, patient-reported outcomes, complications, failures, and reoperations were collected. Results Fourteen studies with 98 patients (100 shoulders) met the inclusion criteria. Patient ages ranged from 7 to 74 years. The nonarthroplasty surgical techniques utilized included microfracture (67 shoulders), osteochondral transplantation (28 shoulders), chondrocyte transplantation (4 shoulders), and internal fixation (1 shoulder). The rates of radiographic union and progression of osteoarthritis ranged between 90% to 100% and 57% to 100%, respectively. Visual analog scores ranged from 0 to 1.9 at final follow-up. Mean postoperative ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons) shoulder scores ranged from 75.8-100. Mean postoperative CSS (Constant Shoulder Score) scores ranged from 83.3-94. Mean postoperative SSV (Subjective Shoulder Value) ranged from 70% to 99%. Failure and reoperation rates ranged between 0% to 35% and 0% to 30%, respectively, with the most common reoperation being conversion to prosthetic arthroplasty. Conclusions In this systematic review, nonarthroplasty surgical techniques demonstrated acceptable rates of radiographic healing, improved patient reported outcomes, minimal complications, and low rates of failure or reoperation. Joint preserving techniques are likely viable options to prolong function of the native shoulder and provide short- to midterm pain relief in young and highly active patients. Level of Evidence Level IV.

In a small retrospective cohort of patients with syndesmotic injury, only athletes benefited from placement of a suture button device: a pilot study

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25
Author(s):  
Joseph J Kromka ◽  
Monique C Chambers ◽  
Adam Popchak ◽  
James Irrgang ◽  
MaCalus V Hogan
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
School Level ◽  
High Demand ◽  
High School Level ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Phone Calls ◽  
Patient Reported

ObjectivesInjuries to the ankle are common, with a significant number of ligamentous injuries involving the syndesmosis. In syndesmotic injuries severe enough to require surgical fixation, the two leading techniques are rigid screw and suture button fixation. The literature has shown that both techniques are effective, but there remains debate on the optimum method of treatment. The goal of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes for these repair methods in a population of athletes.MethodsThis study was a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients who had undergone rigid screw or suture button fixation for an injury to the ankle syndesmosis. Specifically, a subpopulation of athletes was examined as it was hypothesised that these high-demand patients would have higher patient-reported outcomes with ongoing suture button fixation. Study participants were identified through a search of the medical record and were recruited through mailed letters and phone calls. Participants completed patient-reported outcome questionnaires including the Activities of Daily Living and Sports Subscales of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) survey, FAAM Sports Subscale survey, Veteran’s Rand 12-item Health Survey (VR-12) and a customised athletic activity questionnaire. These patient-reported outcomes were compared between those who underwent screw fixation and those who underwent suture button fixation.Results32 patients completed the study, with 17 of these designated as ‘athletes’ competing in strenuous sports activities that involve jumping, cutting and hard pivoting including football, soccer, basketball, volleyball and gymnastics at the high school level or above. Patients were on average 3.9 years post op (SD 2.2). With the numbers available, no difference in outcomes between patients with rigid screw or suture button fixation was observed in the study as a whole. In a subpopulation of athletes, patients who received suture button fixation had higher FAAM scores compared with those treated with rigid screw fixation (p=0.02). Still, in the subpopulation of athletes, no statistical difference was observed with the available numbers for the other patient-reported outcomes.ConclusionThis pilot study of outcomes in an athletic population suggests that athletic patients may benefit from suture button fixation and lays the groundwork for future work examining the use of suture button fixation in high-demand patients.Level of evidenceLevel III—Retrospective Comparative Study.

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcomes following Arthroscopic Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 058-062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline A. Selles ◽  
Philip N. d'Ailly ◽  
Niels W.L. Schep
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Additional Surgery ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Triangular Fibrocartilage ◽  
Operative Findings

Abstract Background Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injury is a common cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain, which may lead to serious physical impairments. Arthroscopic repair has benefits such as less soft tissue damage, greater surgical accuracy, and may lead to faster recovery than open repair. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the functional outcome of patients with symptomatic TFCC injuries treated with arthroscopic debridement or repair. Patients and Methods A retrospective study of all consecutive patients with a TFCC injury treated arthroscopically was conducted. The primary outcome was the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score. Secondary outcomes were, pain, operative findings, complications, and additional treatment. Results A total of 51 patients with a median follow-up of 16.5 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 13–25) were included. Injuries were treated with TFCC debridement (n = 25), TFCC ligament to capsule suturing (n = 10), TFCC debridement and ligament to capsule suturing (n = 7), TFCC debridement and synovectomy (n = 5), and TFCC foveal reinsertion with a suture anchor (n = 4). The median PRWE was 19.5 (IQR: 6–49). Complications occurred in three patients and in nine patients additional surgery was performed. Conclusion Arthroscopic treatment of TFCC lesions leads to satisfactory functional outcomes. Level of Evidence This is a Level IV study.

Outcomes following surgical treatment of distal radial fracture: a comparison of older and younger patients using PROMIS

2022 ◽  
pp. 175319342110702
Author(s):  
Alex M. Hollenberg ◽  
Jennifer Z. Mao ◽  
Warren C. Hammert
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Distal Radial Fracture ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Radial Fracture ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Measurement Information System ◽  
Postoperative Improvement

The purpose of this study was to assess the recovery patterns following surgery for distal radial fracture (DRF) in patients over ( n = 99) and under ( n = 273) the age of 65 using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) questionnaires. Both the older and younger cohorts showed postoperative improvement in PF and PI. The younger cohort had higher PF scores from 1 to 6 months postoperatively, however, PI scores were not significantly different between the cohorts during any period. A greater proportion of younger patients achieved the minimal clinically important difference improvement on the PROMIS PF (80% versus 66%) and PI (88% versus 75%) scales. To appropriately manage postoperative expectations, older patients should be counselled that they would likely experience most of their functional recovery by 3 months and limitations due to pain would likely be stable by 1 month. Level of evidence: II

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document