City or landside area: Do participation rates of quality ensured screening colonoscopy differ?

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Hinterberger ◽  
D Penz ◽  
E Kammerlander-Waldmann ◽  
B Majcher ◽  
A Asaturi ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Pardey ◽  
Kristine Kreis ◽  
Torben Schmidt ◽  
Jona T. Stahmeyer ◽  
Christian Krauth ◽  
...  

AbstractWith an incidence of 58,000 cases per year, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer in Germany. Although guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (gFOBT) and colonoscopy are accepted strategies for CRC screening offered for individuals aged 50 or 55 onwards, utilization rates remain low.This study examines various determinants for participation in CRC screening using claims data provided by the AOK Niedersachsen and covering the years 2014 to 2016. Using multivariate logistic regression models, we analyzed sociodemographic factors (sex, age, nationality, type of employment) associated with screening behavior, including individuals who underwent colonoscopy or gFOBT. The effect of school education and professional qualification was estimated using subgroups of employees with social insurance.The analysis consisted of 620,977 insured individuals in the study population for screening colonoscopy, while the gFOBT study population contained 845,191 individuals. With increasing age, individuals were less likely to participate in CRC screening. Participation rates for screening were higher for women than men in younger age groups. However, men in higher age groups showed increased participation rates in gFOBT screening. When compared with German citizens, Turkish citizens use the colonoscopy less often and the gFOBT more often. In contrast to employees with social insurance, unemployed individuals accept the prevention services less frequently, whereas pensioners and voluntarily insured individuals exhibit increased participation rates. In terms of education and professional qualification, we estimated a significantly lower participation rate exclusively for the least educated individuals. The results help to better understand patterns of utilization and can contribute to the development of information programs for specific groups.


2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (12) ◽  
pp. 1307-1312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianzuo Zhan ◽  
Thomas Hielscher ◽  
Asmé Bilge ◽  
Thomas Giese ◽  
Christoph Schäfer ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aim Participation rates in the German colorectal cancer screening program are low. Starting in 2013, a large health insurance plan in Bavaria, Germany, is sending an additional invitation letter to insured individuals when they turn 50 or 55 years and become eligible for participation in the program. The letter provides detailed information on colorectal cancer screening. We assessed the impact of the invitation letter on utilization rates. Methods Insurance claims data of a total of 48 343 individuals who had turned 50 or 55 years between 2012 to 2014 were reviewed for utilization rates of screening colonoscopy and fecal blood tests. Utilization rates 1 year prior (2012) and 2 years after introduction of the invitation letter (2013 and 2014) were compared. Furthermore, providers of colorectal cancer screening were determined. Results Within 6 months after turning 50 or 55 years, 8.8 – 10.2 % of all insured individuals participated in colorectal cancer screening, with the majority being females. After the introduction of the invitation letter, a moderate increase in participation rates could be observed (increase to 109 % [RR 101.7 – 117.3 %, p = 0.02] in 2014). The uptake rate of screening colonoscopy was significantly higher in recipients of the letter (increase to 138.4 % [RR 110.4 – 173.8 %, p = 0.0043] in 2013 and to 149 % [RR 119.5 – 186.3 %, p = 0.0003] in 2014). Furthermore, a significantly higher proportion of general practitioners and gastroenterologists provided colorectal cancer screening in individuals receiving the invitation letter. Conclusions Introduction of an invitation letter can improve participation rates for colorectal cancer screening.


2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Bannert ◽  
K Reinhart ◽  
D Dunkler ◽  
M Trauner ◽  
W Weiss ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Repici ◽  
C Hassan ◽  
R Bisschops ◽  
P Bhandari ◽  
E Dekker ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document