scholarly journals Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (04) ◽  
pp. 236-239
Author(s):  
Jordan Kaplan ◽  
Ryan D. Wagner ◽  
Tara L. Braun ◽  
Carrie Chu ◽  
Sebastian J. Winocour
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Patient Selection ◽  
Breast Implant ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Operative Planning ◽  
Initial Results

AbstractPrepectoral breast reconstruction was first done in the early 1960s; however, while initial results were promising, high complication rates led surgeons to move toward submuscular implant placement. We soon came to find that submuscular implant placement was not without its own set of drawbacks. Surgeons have since revisited the efficacy of prepectoral breast reconstruction in light of new surgical and technological advances. Following these advancements, complication profiles for prepectoral breast reconstruction have drastically improved. Despite this change, surgeons recognize that prepectoral implant placement is not for everyone and patient selection is critical to success. As increasing numbers of these procedures continue to be done, we must now look to conduct direct comparisons between submuscular and prepectoral breast implant placement so that surgeons can make evidence-based decisions on patient selection and operative planning.

scholarly journals Attachment distribution of pectoral muscle origins identified in dual-plane breast implant insertion

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-164
Author(s):  
Su Bong Nam ◽  
Kyung Ho Song ◽  
Jung Yeol Seo ◽  
June Seok Choi ◽  
Tae Seo Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Breast Implant ◽  
Pectoralis Major Muscle ◽  
Pectoral Muscle ◽  
Augmentation Mammoplasty ◽  
Dual Plane ◽  
Reconstruction Surgery ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
The Right

Background Implant-based dual-plane augmentation mammoplasty requires accurate separation of the pectoralis major muscle (PMM) at its origins. The authors identified the PMM origins during breast reconstruction surgery with the goal of providing additional information on subpectoral implant insertion for reconstructive or aesthetic purposes.Methods This study was conducted on 67 patients who underwent breast reconstruction surgery at the breast center of our hospital between November 2016 and June 2018. In total, 34 left and 39 right hemithoraces were examined. The left and right hemithoraces were each divided into 15 zones to determine the percentage of PMM attachments in each zone. The distribution of PMM origins in each zone was examined to identify any statistically significant differences.Results There were no statistically significant differences in the origins of the PMM between the right and left hemithoraces. The percentage of attachments increased moving from the fourth to the sixth rib and from the lateral to the medial aspect.Conclusions The anatomical findings of this study could be used as a reference for accurate dissection of the origins of the PMM for the preparation of the subpectoral pocket for subpectoral implant placement.

scholarly journals A guide to implant dentistry part 2: surgical and prosthodontic considerations

Dental Update ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 514-523
Author(s):  
Despoina Chatzistavrianou ◽  
Paul HR Wilson ◽  
Philip Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Patient Assessment ◽  
Missing Teeth ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Careful Treatment ◽  
Operative Planning ◽  
Implant Dentistry

Implant rehabilitation is a successful treatment modality for the replacement of missing teeth, but careful treatment planning, restoratively-driven implant placement and individualized maintenance are prerequisites for success in order to control and minimize technical and biologic complications. The first part of the series focused on new patient assessment and pre-operative planning. The second part of the series will discuss the surgical and prosthodontic considerations and maintenance of implant-supported restorations. CPD/Clinical Relevance: To provide the dental practitioner with an evidence-based overview regarding treatment planning, surgical and prosthodontic considerations and maintenance of implant-supported restorations.

scholarly journals Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Early Outcomes and Analysis of Postoperative Pain

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafi Fredman ◽  
Cindy Wu ◽  
Mihaela Rapolti ◽  
Daniel Luckett ◽  
Jason Fine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Aesthetic Results ◽  
Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy

Abstract Background Direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction provides high-quality aesthetic results in appropriate candidates. Most commonly, implants are placed in the subpectoral space which can lead to pain and breast animation. Surgical and technological advances have allowed for successful prepectoral implant placement which may eliminate these trade-offs. Objectives Here we present early outcomes from 153 reconstructions in 94 patients who underwent prepectoral DTI. We sought to determine whether these patients have less postoperative pain and narcotic use than subpectoral implant or expander placement. Methods A retrospective review was performed for all prepectoral DTI reconstructions at our institution from 2015 to 2016. Data were collected on postoperative pain and narcotic use while in hospital. Results The average follow-up time was 8.5 months (range, 3–17 months) and the overall complication rate was 27% (n = 41) with the most common complications being skin necrosis (9%, n = 13) and infection (7%, n = 11). No statistically significant difference in complications was found in patients who underwent postmastectomy radiation therapy. Patients who underwent prepectoral DTI reconstruction did not have a statistically significant difference in postoperative pain and narcotic use while in-hospital compared with other techniques. Conclusion Prepectoral DTI reconstruction provides good results with similar complication rates to subpectoral techniques. Prepectoral DTI eliminates the problem of breast animation. Although our series did not reach statistical significance in pain scores or requirement for postoperative narcotics, we believe that it is an important preliminary result and with larger numbers we anticipate a more definitive conclusion. Level of Evidence: 4

Use of Strict Patient Selection Criteria to Achieve Significant Surgical Outcomes from a Low DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (08) ◽  
pp. 622-630
Author(s):  
Han Gyu Cha ◽  
Min Kyu Kang ◽  
Hyun Ho Han ◽  
Eun Key Kim ◽  
Jin Sup Eom
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Ct Angiography ◽  
Patient Selection ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Diep Flap ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Abdominal Scar ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Selection Criteria

Abstract Background The low deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap was first introduced in 2016 as it had aesthetic advantages over the conventional DIEP flap. With our experience of over 100 low DIEP flap procedures to date, we have conspicuously lowered complication rates and established more definitive criteria to select proper candidates. Methods We analyzed 103 patients who underwent breast reconstruction with the low DIEP flap at our hospital between May 2014 and June 2018. Demographics, patient selection criteria, flap specifics, surgical outcomes including postoperative complications, and the location of the abdominal scar and umbilicus were reviewed retrospectively. Results The mean patient age was 46.7 years, and the average body mass index was 23.7 kg/m2. A low DIEP with an average weight of 377 g was utilized within 6 hours 17 minutes in this cohort. There was no significant difference in the rate of venous congestion or fat necrosis compared with the conventional DIEP flap. The average distance from the pubic hairline to the abdominal scar was 0.6 cm and from the anterior superior iliac spine to the abdominal scar was −0.4 cm. The postoperative location of the umbilicus was 7.0 cm above the pubic hairline. Conclusion The low DIEP flap is not only a reliable option for a breast reconstruction but is an aesthetically superior approach with a lower abdominal scar and natural umbilicus. Patients may benefit from this technique if prudently selected by computed tomography (CT) angiography. A perforator that is larger than 1 mm in diameter and well enhanced on CT angiography from the division of the external iliac artery to the abdominal skin particularly in the intramuscular course should be selected.

scholarly journals Comprehensive Comparison Between Shaped Versus Round Implants for Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
So-Eun Han ◽  
Kyeong-Tae Lee ◽  
Saik Bang
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Breast Implant ◽  
Capsular Contracture ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Relative Risks ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Aesthetic Results ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Studies

Abstract Background Prosthetic breast reconstruction has been gaining popularity and a variety of implant options are currently available. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the safety and efficacy of newly developed shaped implants compared with those of conventional round implants. To date, few studies have investigated the outcomes of breast reconstruction with shaped versus round implants. Objectives The present study aimed to comprehensively compare, via meta-analytic methodology, shaped and round breast implant reconstruction in terms of complication profiles and aesthetic satisfaction. Methods PubMed/MEDLINE, Ovid, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify relevant studies presenting the complication rates for shaped and round implant groups. The relative risks of the following complications between the groups were calculated: infection, seroma, capsular contracture, rupture, rippling, reconstruction failure, and implant exchange or removal. Outcomes of aesthetic satisfaction included aesthetic results and patient-reported outcomes. Results Meta-analysis of 8 retrospective cohort studies, representing 2490 cases of implant-based breast reconstruction, was performed. There were no significant differences in the risks of infection, seroma, capsular contracture, and reconstruction failure between the 2 groups. The risks of implant rupture and rippling were significantly reduced with shaped implants. In a subgroup analysis of shaped/textured and round/smooth implants, the risk of infection was significantly enhanced in the former, whereas incidences of other complications, including capsular contracture and reconstruction failure, were similar. Aesthetic satisfaction analysis of the 2 groups demonstrated similar outcome scores with favorable overall results. Conclusions Our results suggest that both shaped and round implants might provide favorable breast reconstruction outcomes with similarly low complication rates and aesthetic results. Level of Evidence: 4

Myocutaneous Gracilis Free Flaps in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Variations of the Upper Gracilis Flap

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (09) ◽  
pp. 630-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicky Kang ◽  
Emilie Robinson ◽  
Eric Barker ◽  
Anuja Antony
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Low Incidence

Background The transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flap has gained increasing acceptance as a reliable option for breast reconstruction, specifically in patients without adequate abdominal tissue. Three major flap designs of the upper gracilis flap have been proposed to balance volume needs with flap vascularity. A systematic review was performed to identify outcomes of the major gracilis flaps: TUG, vertical-transverse upper gracilis (V-TUG), and longitudinal gracilis myocutaneous (LGM) flaps. This study is the first and only systematic review to date reviewing the variations of the upper gracilis flap in microsurgical breast reconstruction. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed database from 1966 through 2015. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Outcomes assessed included total flap volumes, additional breast procedures to achieve intended breast volume, and complication rates. Results A total of 485 gracilis-type flaps were performed in 335 patients. V-TUG flaps provided the largest mean flap weights and did not require additional lipofilling or implant placement, whereas the majority of TUG flaps (50.6%) required additional fat grafting or implant placements. All flap types demonstrated a low incidence of donor-site morbidity. Overall flap loss rate was low; TUG flaps reported 2.3% total and 2.0% partial flap losses, while V-TUG and LGM flaps reported no flap losses. Conclusion This review found V-TUG yielded highest mean flap weights and did not require additional breast augmentation procedures as compared with the TUG. Also, the V-TUG was a safer donor-site option with fewer flap and donor-site morbidities.

scholarly journals A guide to implant dentistry part 1: treatment planning

Dental Update ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 412-425
Author(s):  
Despoina Chatzistavrianou ◽  
Paul HR Wilson ◽  
Philip Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
High Survival ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Careful Treatment ◽  
Operative Planning ◽  
Implant Dentistry ◽  
Term Maintenance

Implant rehabilitation is considered a predictable treatment modality to replace single and multiple missing units, with high survival rates. Technical and biological complications are commonly encountered and careful treatment planning, restorative-driven implant placement and long-term maintenance are prerequisites of a successful implant rehabilitation. The aim of this two-part series is to provide an evidence-based overview regarding the sequence of treatment planning and the treatment stages of a successful implant rehabilitation. The first part of the series will focus on new patient assessment and pre-operative planning. The second part of the series will discuss the surgical and prosthodontic considerations and maintenance of implant-supported restorations. CPD/Clinical Relevance: To provide the dental practitioner with an evidence-based overview regarding treatment planning, surgical and prosthodontic considerations and maintenance of implant-supported restorations.

scholarly journals An Initial Experience and Usefulness of Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix (PADM) Assisted Prepectoral Breast Implant Surgery: Case Series and Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Woo Jin Song ◽  
Hyung Bo Sim ◽  
Hyun Gyo Jeong ◽  
Sang Gue Kang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Breast Implant ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Implant Surgery ◽  
Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Acellular Dermal

Abstract Background: We report our experience with performing prepectoral placement breast implant surgery using Supporix TM (HansBiomed, Korea), a porcine acellular dermal matrix (PADM), for cosmetic and reconstructive indications. The clinical efficiency, safety, and cost-effectiveness of PADM were also discussed. Methods: A single-center, retrospective study was designed from December 2017 to December 2019. The participants were Korean female patients who had PADM-assisted prepectoral breast implant surgery performed by two surgeons (S.G.K. & H.B.S.). All complications were registered and analyzed. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the complication rates after PADM-assisted prepectoral breast implant surgery were conducted for comparison with other studies. Subgroup analysis was performed in three groups according to the operation type: the cosmetic breast surgery (CBS) group, the immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IIBR) group, and the delayed implant-based breast reconstruction (DIBR) group. Results: A total of 20 breasts in 16 patients were included in our study with a median follow-up period of 8.25 months. In a systematic review, 20 publications with a total of 2,504 breasts in 1,921 females were quantitively analyzed. The overall complication rates in our study and other studies were 14% and 24% in total group analysis, 0% and 12% in the CBS group, 62% and 26% in the IIBR group, and 0% and 28% in the DIBR group, respectively.Conclusion: Our data support the effectiveness of PADM-assisted prepectoral breast implant surgery, which was comparable to other studies. PADM was effective for reducing seroma and hematoma in the revision CBS group and the DIBR group. In the IIBR group, it was helpful in preventing implant loss and explantation.

scholarly journals Implant Replacement or Removal: What Happens after Capsular Contracture? A German Study Examining Breast Implant Revision Surgery and Patient Choices in 946 Cases

Breast Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Shafreena Kühn ◽  
Mara Anna Georgijewitsch ◽  
Andrej Wehle ◽  
Moritz Billner ◽  
Lara Küenzlen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Breast Implant ◽  
Capsular Contracture ◽  
Implant Removal ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Autologous Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
In Situ Implant

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Capsular contracture most often leads to implant revision surgery for aesthetic or reconstructive purposes. However, little is known about which operation is chosen when revision surgery has to be performed. We performed analysis of revision indications and performed revision surgery considering implant removal or replacement and additional surgical procedures. To our knowledge, this study presents the largest German single-center analysis regarding implant revision surgery after the onset of complications. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Retrospective 10-year data analysis of a single-center population undergoing breast implant revision surgery. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Capsular contracture was the most frequent finding before reoperation, both removal and replacement (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). It was linked to longer duration of in situ implant placement (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05) and more frequently in reconstructive patients (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). Implant replacement was performed more often before definite implant removal for reconstructive patients (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). Mean duration of in situ implant placement before definite removal was lower for reconstructive patients (<i>p</i> = 0.005). Overall reconstructive patients were older than aesthetic patients (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). After implant removal, 61.7% of aesthetic patients chose to undergo mastopexy, 54.7% of reconstructive patients opted for autologous breast reconstruction, and 25.4% did not choose an additional surgical procedure after implant removal. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Significant differences are observed for reconstructive and aesthetic patients regarding indication leading to revision surgery, time of revision surgery, and the type of performed revision surgery itself. After implant removal, more than 60% of aesthetic patients undergo mastopexy, more than half of reconstructive patients choose autologous breast reconstruction, and over a quarter of patients choose no additional surgical procedures.

Should Sequential Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Be Limited to Patients Younger than 80? A Two-Arm Propensity Matched Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Klasan ◽  
Sven Edward Putnis ◽  
Wai Weng Yeo ◽  
Darli Myat ◽  
Brett Andrew Fritsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Selection ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Proper Patient Selection ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractDespite multiple studies, there remains a debate on the safety of bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) in the average age patient, with a paucity of data on the outcome of BTKA in an elderly population. This study included 89 patients aged 80 years and older undergoing sequential BTKA over 14 years were identified in a prospectively collected database. Two matched comparison groups were created: patients under 80 undergoing sequential BTKA and patients over 80 undergoing unilateral TKA (UTKA). An analysis of complications, mortality, revision, and patient-reported outcome measures was performed. Mean age of the elderly cohorts was similar: 82.6 for BTKA and 82.9 for UTKA. The average age BTKA cohort had a mean age of 69.1. Complication rates were higher in bilateral cohorts, more so in the elderly BTKA cohort. Pulmonary embolism (PE) was observed in bilateral cohorts only. In these patients, history of PE and ischemic heart disease was a strong predictive factor for developing a major complication. There was no difference in revision rates and infection rates between the three cohorts, and no difference in patient survivorship between the two elderly cohorts. Through the combination of low revision and high survivorship rates and comparable clinical outcomes, this article demonstrates that simultaneous BTKA is an appropriate option to consider for an elderly patient, with proper patient selection and perioperative management. The demonstrated risk groups show that emphasis on patient selection should be focused on medical history rather than chronological age.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document