Benefits of CT Scanning for the Management of Knee Arthritis and Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nipun Sodhi ◽  
David J. Jacofsky ◽  
Alexander Chee ◽  
Michael A. Mont
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patellofemoral Joint ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Component Alignment ◽  
Knee Arthritis ◽  
Plain Radiographs ◽  
Tissue Protection ◽  
Joint Assessment ◽  
Knee Compartments

AbstractThis review investigated the potential value of computed tomography (CT) scans for the evaluation and management of knee arthritis and arthroplasty. Specifically, we evaluated the following: (1) assessment of arthritis within knee compartments, (2) patellofemoral joint assessment, (3) implant sizing prediction, (4) component alignment, (5) soft-tissue protection, and (6) potential concerns with radiation exposure. To compare if CT or X-ray imaging is more accurate and clinically relevant, a search was performed using Boolean search operators and terms: “CT,” “radiograph,” “joint alignment,” “knee,” and “arthroplasty,” which yielded 661 results. Studies were evaluated based on (1) assessment of arthritis within knee compartments, (2) patellofemoral joint assessment, (3) implant sizing prediction, (4) component alignment, (5) soft-tissue protection, and (6) potential concerns with radiation exposure. Correlative and comparative analyses of imaging modalities to pre-, intra-, and postoperative clinical and patient-related factors were performed for the 63 included studies. CT scans were found to better detect medial and lateral arthritic changes, bony deformities, subchondral cysts, and cartilage losses. CT scans were shown to 99% accurately predict prosthetic sizes preoperatively. CT scans can also help better visualize surrounding anatomy, such as the posterior cruciate ligament, and have therefore been linked to better soft tissue protection during total knee arthroplasty. Although radiation is a potential concern, newer imaging protocols have comparable exposure to plain radiographs. Compared with plain radiographs, CT scans were found to be more accurate and provide more clinically relevant data. Therefore, the authors recommend the use of CT for the evaluation of certain patients with arthritis and for preoperative planning for knee arthroplasty.

Utilization of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty for soft tissue protection

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 925-927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Assem A. Sultan ◽  
Nicolas Piuzzi ◽  
Anton Khlopas ◽  
Morad Chughtai ◽  
Nipun Sodhi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Robotic Arm ◽  
Tissue Protection ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Demonstrated Soft Tissue Protection

10.29007/8bxp ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Hampp ◽  
Manoshi Bhowmik-Stoker ◽  
Laura Scholl ◽  
Jason Otto ◽  
David Jacofsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Cadaver Study ◽  
Patellar Ligament ◽  
Robotic Arm ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Tissue Protection ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Patellar Eversion

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) typically addresses end-stage osteoarthritis. While TKA procedures have demonstrated clinical success, occasionally intraoperative complications can occur. This cadaver study examined the potential benefits of soft tissue protection in robotic-arm assisted TKA (RATKA). Six cadaver knees were prepared using RATKA by a single surgeon from a high-volume TKA joint center with no former clinical robotic experience, and compared to seven manually performed cases as a control. The presence of soft tissue disruption was assessed by having the surgeon perform visual evaluation and palpation of the medial collateral ligament (MCL), lateral collateral ligament (LCL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), and the patellar ligament after the procedures. The amount of tibial subluxation and patellar eversion was recorded for each case.For all RATKA cases, there was no visible evidence of disruption of any of the ligaments. All RATKA cases were successfully left with a bone island on the tibial plateau, which protected the PCL. Tibial subluxation and patellar eversion were not required for visualization. In two of the seven MTKA cases, there was slight disruption noted of the PCL, although this did not lead to any apparent change in the functional integrity of the ligament. All MTKA cases required tibial subluxation and patellar eversion to achieve optimal visualization.Aspects of soft tissue protection were noted in this cadaver study for RATKA. Standard retraction techniques during cutting are recommended. This is the first study to have soft tissue injury parameters assessed for RATKA, and may serve as a platform for future studies.

scholarly journals Functional Correctability of the Knee Joint using 3D-to-2D Registration of X-Ray Imaging in Stressed Positions

10.29007/g7l8 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jialong Li ◽  
David Liu ◽  
Stephen McMahon ◽  
Jonathan Baré ◽  
Andrew Shimmin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Anatomical Landmarks ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Tissue Structures

Correcting the knee joint to accommodate the pre-existing soft tissue structures is a major aim in total knee arthroplasty. 3D-to-2D registration of segmented boney geometry obtained from computer tomography (CT) scans to functionally stressed positions in X-Ray (XR) imaging can be a more accurate method of obtaining the laxity envelop. From which, a more patient specific limit for the correctability of the knee joint can be found. Supine CT scans were segmented, and 3D bone models and anatomical landmarks were registered to 2D functional stressed XR imaging. The functional position of the patient femoral and tibial bone is then used to calculate the varus and valgus extent of the patient’s knee joint laxity. 103 preoperative knees undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty identified from six different surgeons. The range of patients who are correctable back to within 3 degrees when a force is applied is 52%. 65% of patients who were within 3 degrees varus/valgus for tibia varus were correctable, while 41% of patients who were within 3 degrees varus/valgus for femoral valgus were correctable. 26% of patients were correctable when the LDFA is outside the threshold and MPTA is not, while 56% of patients were correctable when the MPTA is outside the threshold and LDFA is not. This study demonstrates the complexity of soft tissue structures of the knee joint. The main finding of this study is that correctability is more sensitive to the proximal tibial than the distal and posterior femoral articulating geometry. A lack of dependency between correctability of the knee joint and anatomical measures specific to flexion of the knee is seen. Careful consideration should be made intraoperatively when balancing the knee joint flexion gaps surrounding the soft tissue structures.

Importance of Soft Tissue Integrity on Biomechanical Studies of the Patella After TKA

1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zong-Ping Luo ◽  
Horng-Chaung Hsu ◽  
James A. Rand ◽  
Kai-Nan An
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patellofemoral Joint ◽  
Patellar Tracking ◽  
Joint Force ◽  
Tissue Integrity ◽  
Total Knee

This study evaluated the effects of soft tissue integrity on patellar tracking and patellofemoral joint force after total knee arthroplasty. The results indicate that partial dissection of the soft tissue integrity in the in vitro biomechanical studies of the patellofemoral joint can alter patellar tracking and joint force significantly, leading to improper conclusions.

Is Soft Tissue Laxity Associated with Tissue Metal Concentrations after Total Knee Arthroplasty?

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-85
Author(s):  
Meredith Perkins ◽  
Julie Lowell ◽  
Christina Arnholt ◽  
Daniel MacDonald ◽  
Anita L. Kerkhof ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Metal Concentrations ◽  
Soft Tissue Laxity ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals FRI0418 SELECTIVE PATELLAR RESURFACING IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIC KNEE: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 807.3-807
Author(s):  
I. Moriyama
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patellofemoral Joint ◽  
Osteoarthritis Of The Knee ◽  
Patellar Resurfacing ◽  
Criterion A ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean

Background:No widely accepted view or criteria currently exist concerning whether or not patellar replacement (resurfacing) should accompany total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the knee.1)2)3)Objectives:We recently devised our own criteria for application of patellar replacement and performed selective patellar replacement in accordance with this set of criteria. The clinical outcome was analyzed.Methods:The study involved 1150 knees on which total knee arthroplasty was performed between 2005 and 2019 because of osteoarthritis of the knee. The mean age at operation was 73, and the mean postoperative follow-up period was 91 months. Our criteria for application of patellar replacement are given below. Criterion A pertains to evaluation of preoperative clinical symptoms related to the patellofemoral joint: (a) interview regarding presence/absence of pain around the patella, (b) cracking or pain heard or felt when standing up from a low chair, (c) pain when going upstairs/downstairs. Because it is difficult for individual patients to identify the origin of pain (patellofemoral joint or femorotibial joint), the examiner advised each patient about the location of the patellofemoral joint when checking for these symptoms. Criterion B pertains to intense narrowing or disappearance of the patellofemoral joint space on preoperative X-ray of the knee. Criterion C pertains to the intraoperatively assessed extent of patellar cartilage degeneration corresponding to class 4 of the Outerbridge classification. Patellar replacement was applied to cases satisfying at least one of these sets of criteria (A-a,-b,-c, B and C). Postoperatively, pain of the patellofemoral joint was evaluated again at the time of the last observation, using Criterion A-a,-b,-c.Results:Patellar replacement was applied to 110 knees in accordance with the criteria mentioned above. There were 82 knees satisfying at least one of the Criterion sets A-a,-b,-c, 39 knees satisfying Criterion B and 70 knees satisfying Criterion C. (Some knees satisfied 2 or 3 of Criteria A, B and C).When the pain originating from patellofemoral joint (Criterion A) was clinically assessed at the time of last observation, pain was not seen in any knee of the replacement group and the non-replacement group.Conclusion:Whether or not patellar replacement is needed should be determined on the basis of the symptoms or findings related to the patellofemoral joint, and we see no necessity of patellar replacement in cases free of such symptoms/findings. When surgery was performed in accordance with the criteria on patellar replacement as devised by us, the clinical outcome of the operated patellofemoral joint was favorable, although the follow-up period was not long. Although further follow-up is needed, the results obtained indicate that selective patellar replacement yields favorable outcome if applied to cases judged indicated with appropriate criteria.References:[1]The Effect of Surgeon Preference for Selective Patellar Resurfacing on Revision Risk in Total Knee Replacement: An Instrumental Variable Analysis of 136,116 Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.Vertullo CJ, Graves SE, Cuthbert AR, Lewis PL J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jul 17;101(14):1261-1270[2]Resurfaced versus Non-Resurfaced Patella in Total Knee Arthroplasty.Allen W1, Eichinger J, Friedman R. Indian J Orthop. 2018 Jul-Aug;52(4):393-398.[3]Is Selectively Not Resurfacing the Patella an Acceptable Practice in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?Maradit-Kremers H, Haque OJ, Kremers WK, Berry DJ, Lewallen DG, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1143-1147.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Postoperative laxity of the lateral soft tissue is largely negligible in total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949902110020
Author(s):  
Seikai Toyooka ◽  
Hironari Masuda ◽  
Nobuhiro Nishihara ◽  
Takashi Kobayashi ◽  
Wataru Miyamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Mechanical Axis ◽  
Varus Deformity ◽  
Varus Knee ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Knee Deformity ◽  
Varus Stress ◽  
Total Knee

Purpose: To evaluate the integrity of lateral soft tissue in varus osteoarthritis knee by comparing the mechanical axis under varus stress during navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty before and after compensating for a bone defect with the implant. Methods: Sixty-six knees that underwent total knee arthroplasty were investigated. The mechanical axis of the operated knee was evaluated under manual varus stress immediately after knee exposure and after navigation-assisted implantation. The correlation between each value of the mechanical axis and degree of preoperative varus deformity was compared by regression analysis. Results: The maximum mechanical axis under varus stress immediately after knee exposure increased in proportion to the degree of preoperative varus deformity. Moreover, the maximum mechanical axis under varus stress after implantation increased in proportion to the degree of preoperative varus deformity. Therefore, the severity of varus knee deformity leads to a progressive laxity of the lateral soft tissue. However, regression coefficients after implantation were much smaller than those measured immediately after knee exposure (0.99 vs 0.20). Based on the results of the regression formula, the postoperative laxity of the lateral soft tissue was negligible, provided that an appropriate thickness of the implant was compensated for the bone and cartilage defect in the medial compartment without changing the joint line. Conclusion: The severity of varus knee deformity leads to a progressive laxity of the lateral soft tissue. However, even if the degree of preoperative varus deformity is severe, most cases may not require additional procedures to address the residual lateral laxity.

scholarly journals Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty using surgeon-defined assessment versus a gap-balancer or electronic sensor

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Zhao ◽  
Yanqing Liu ◽  
Hua Tian
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Sensor Data ◽  
Soft Tissue Balancing ◽  
Electronic Sensor ◽  
Prior Performance ◽  
Cumulative Summation ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background Soft tissue balancing is essential for the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and is mainly dependent on surgeon-defined assessment (SDA) or a gap-balancer (GB). However, an electronic sensor has been developed to objectively measure the gap pressure. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of soft tissue balancing using SDA and GB compared with a sensor. Methods Forty-eight patients undergoing TKA (60 knees) were prospectively enrolled. Soft tissue balancing was sequentially performed using SDA, a GB, and an electronic sensor. We compared the SDA, GB, and sensor data to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy at 0°, 45°, 90°, and 120° flexion. Cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis was performed to assess the surgeon’s performance during the sensor introductory phase. Results The sensitivity of SDA was 63.3%, 68.3%, 80.0%, and 80.0% at 0°, 45°, 90°, and 120°, respectively. The accuracy of the GB compared with sensor data was 76.7% and 71.7% at 0° and 90°, respectively. Cohen’s kappa coefficient for the accuracy of the GB was 0.406 at 0° (moderate agreement) and 0.227 at 90° (fair agreement). The CUSUM 0° line achieved good prior performance at case 45, CUSUM 90° and 120° showed a trend toward good prior performance, while CUSUM 45° reached poor prior performance at case 8. Conclusion SDA was a poor predictor of knee balance. GB improved the accuracy of soft tissue balancing, but was still less accurate than the sensor, particularly for unbalanced knees. SDA improved with ongoing use of the sensor, except at 45° flexion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document