Perinatal outcomes of intended vaginal breech births with epidural versus non-epidural analgesia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Allert ◽  
L Jennewein ◽  
N Bock ◽  
D Brüggmann ◽  
F Louwen
2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-188
Author(s):  
K. A Bozhenkov ◽  
T. A Gustovarova ◽  
A. N Ivanyan ◽  
V. L Vinogradov ◽  
E. M Shifman

This paper will be concerned with the results of a prospective controlled longitudinal study which has involved 132 secundiparae (among them 69 patients are with the uterine scar after cesarean section). The parturient women have been divided into 3 groups. Group “A” includes 38 women with the uterine scar after cesarean section, in this group epidural analgesia was administered during vaginal delivery. Group “B” includes 32 secundiparae without uterine scar, in this group epidural analgesia was administered during vaginal delivery. Group “C” - 31 women with the uterine scar, no epidural analgesia was administered during vaginal delivery. Based on a comparative assessment of the pain syndrome intensity in labor according to the visual analogue scale, the research has proved that delivery at the women with the uterine scar is accompanied by statistically more significant pain than at the women without uterine scar. The necessity of analgesia during vaginal delivery at the women with the uterine scar has been proved. The effectiveness and safety of epidural analgesia at patients with the uterine scar have been analyzed. It has been proved that epidural analgesia provides anesthesia during vaginal delivery at the women with the uterine scar, while it does not affect the total duration and course of labor, maternal and perinatal outcomes, and does not mask the clinical picture of the uterine rupture threat.


2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki Baek Hwang ◽  
Chan Jong Chung ◽  
Seung Cheol Lee ◽  
Jong Hwan Lee ◽  
Se Hyuk Oh
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document