Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Infections: A Systematic Review

Author(s):  
Kristina Krzelj ◽  
Mate Petricevic ◽  
Hrvoje Gasparovic ◽  
Bojan Biocina ◽  
David McGiffin

AbstractInfection is the most common complication in patients undergoing ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation. Driveline exit site (DLES) infection is the most frequent VAD infection and is a significant cause of adverse events in VAD patients, contributing to morbidity, even mortality, and repetitive hospital readmissions. There are many risk factors for driveline infection (DLI) including younger age, smaller constitution of patients, obesity, exposed velour at the DLES, longer duration of device support, lower cardiac index, higher heart failure score, DLES trauma, and comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and depression. The incidence of DLI depends also on the device type. Numerous measures to prevent DLI currently exist. Some of them are proven, whereas the others remain controversial. Current recommendations on DLES care and DLI management are predominantly based on expert consensus and clinical experience of the certain centers. However, careful and uniform DLES care including obligatory driveline immobilization, previously prepared sterile dressing change kits, and continuous patient education are probably crucial for prevention of DLI. Diagnosis and treatment of DLI are often challenging because of certain immunological alterations in VAD patients and microbial biofilm formation on the driveline surface areas. Although there are many conservative and surgical methods described in the DLI treatment, the only possible permanent solution for DLI resolution in VAD patients is heart transplantation. This systematic review brings a comprehensive synthesis of recent data on the prevention, diagnostic workup, and conservative and surgical management of DLI in VAD patients.

Perfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 026765912110248
Author(s):  
Gregory Reid ◽  
Constantin Mork ◽  
Brigita Gahl ◽  
Christian Appenzeller-Herzog ◽  
Ludwig K von Segesser ◽  
...  

Objectives: The main aim was a systematic evaluation of the current evidence on outcomes for patients undergoing right ventricular assist device (RVAD) implantation following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Methods: This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019130131). Reports evaluating in-hospital as well as follow-up outcome in LVAD and LVAD/RVAD implantation were identified through Ovid Medline, Web of Science and EMBASE. The primary endpoint was mortality at the hospital stay and at follow-up. Pooled incidence of defined endpoints was calculated by using random effects models. Results: A total of 35 retrospective studies that included 3260 patients were analyzed. 30 days mortality was in favour of isolated LVAD implantation 6.74% (1.98–11.5%) versus 31.9% (19.78–44.02%) p = 0.001 in LVAD with temporary need for RVAD. During the hospital stay the incidence of major bleeding was 18.7% (18.2–19.4%) versus 40.0% (36.3–48.8%) and stroke rate was 5.6% (5.4–5.8%) versus 20.9% (16.8–28.3%) and was in favour of isolated LVAD implantation. Mortality reported at short-term as well at long-term was 19.66% (CI 15.73–23.59%) and 33.90% (CI 8.84–59.96%) in LVAD respectively versus 45.35% (CI 35.31–55.4%) p ⩽ 0.001 and 48.23% (CI 16.01–80.45%) p = 0.686 in LVAD/RVAD group respectively. Conclusion: Implantation of a temporary RVAD is allied with a worse outcome during the primary hospitalization and at follow-up. Compared to isolated LVAD support, biventricular mechanical circulatory support leads to an elevated mortality and higher incidence of adverse events such as bleeding and stroke.


Heart & Lung ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noelle V. Pavlovic ◽  
Tania Randell ◽  
Tim Madeira ◽  
Steven Hsu ◽  
Radoslav Zinoviev ◽  
...  

ASAIO Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam J. Prince ◽  
Christopher M. Domenico ◽  
Supriya Shore ◽  
Kimberly A. Urgo ◽  
Pavan Atluri ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 600-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinal Patel ◽  
Syed Saif Abbas Rizvi ◽  
Jae Hwan Choi ◽  
Dylan P. Horan ◽  
Matthew P. Weber ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document