70-Gene Signature in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 375 (22) ◽  
pp. 2199-2201 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (24) ◽  
pp. 2814-2819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Kuijer ◽  
Marieke Straver ◽  
Bianca den Dekker ◽  
Annelotte C.M. van Bommel ◽  
Sjoerd G. Elias ◽  
...  

Purpose Gene-expression profiles increasingly are used in addition to conventional prognostic factors to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) decisions. The Dutch guideline suggests use of validated gene-expression profiles in patients with estrogen receptor (ER) –positive, early-stage breast cancer without overt lymph node metastases. We aimed to assess the impact of a 70-gene signature (70-GS) test on CT decisions in patients with ER-positive, early-stage breast cancer. Patients and Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study in patients younger than 70 years old who had undergone surgery for ER-positive, early-stage breast cancer, physicians were asked whether they intended to administer adjuvant CT before deployment of the 70-GS test and after the test result was available. Results Between October 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015, 660 patients, treated in 33 hospitals, were enrolled. Fifty-one percent of patients had pT1cN0, BRII, HER2-Neu-negative breast cancer. On the basis of conventional clinicopathological characteristics, physicians recommended CT in 270 (41%) of the 660 patients and recommended withholding CT in 107 (16%) of the 660 patients. For the remaining 43% of patients, the physicians were unsure and unable to give advice before 70-GS testing. In patients for whom CT was initially recommended or not recommended, 56% and 59%, respectively, were assigned to a low-risk profile by the 70-GS (κ, 0.02; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.11). After disclosure of the 70-GS test result, the preliminary advice was changed in 51% of patients who received a recommendation before testing; the definitive CT recommendation of the physician was in line with the 70-GS result in 96% of patients. Conclusion In this prospective, multicenter study in a selection of patients with ER-positive, early-stage breast cancer, 70-GS use changed the physician-intended recommendation to administer CT in half of the patients.


2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 1045-1054 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.A. Drukker ◽  
H.C. van den Hout ◽  
G.S. Sonke ◽  
E. Brain ◽  
H. Bonnefoi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 375 (8) ◽  
pp. 717-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima Cardoso ◽  
Laura J. van’t Veer ◽  
Jan Bogaerts ◽  
Leen Slaets ◽  
Giuseppe Viale ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A Crozier ◽  
Julie Barone ◽  
Pat Whitworth ◽  
Abraham Cheong ◽  
Robert Maganini ◽  
...  

Introduction: With an increase in neoadjuvant therapy recommendations for most early-stage breast cancer patients due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it has become increasingly imperative to ensure that molecular diagnostic assays provide reliable results from preoperative core needle biopsies. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the concordance of MammaPrint results (70-gene signature) and BluePrint results (80-gene signature) between core needle biopsies (CNB) and surgical resection (SR) specimens using prospectively collected matched tissues from patients enrolled in the FLEX trial (NCT03053193). Methods: We analyzed 113 matched CNB and SR tumor specimens from women with early-stage breast cancer enrolled in the FLEX trial. Each patient enrolled in the trial receives a MammaPrint recurrence risk classification test with or without BluePrint molecular subtyping. Concordance of MammaPrint is reported using overall percentage agreement, positive predictive value (PPV, High Risk), negative predictive value (NPV, Low Risk), and Cohens kappa coefficient. Additionally, correlations between sample types are reported using Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: We found good concordance for MammaPrint results between CNB and SR tumor samples (90.3%, k = 0.803), with a 95.1% NPV and 84.6% PPV. There was also a strong correlation of MammaPrint indices between CNB and SR specimens (r = 0.94). In addition to our primary objective, we determined the concordance of BluePrint subtyping in the matched tumor samples, and found excellent concordance (98.2%) and strong correlation of BluePrint scores within each subtype. Conclusion: CNB samples demonstrated overall high concordance with paired SR samples for MammaPrint risk classification, ensuring that physicians are provided with accurate prognostic information for therapy decisions based on testing of core biopsy tissue. Further, BluePrint molecular subtyping also had good concordance between the sample types, outperforming concordance rates based on traditional IHC based classification. Overall, with an increase in neoadjuvant therapy, physicans and patients can be assured that MammaPrint and BluePrint provide reliable results that guide timely and appropriate therapies using preoperative CNB specimens.


2019 ◽  
Vol 174 (2) ◽  
pp. 537-542
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Caruana ◽  
Yohann Foucher ◽  
Philippe Tessier ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Frenel ◽  
Jean-Marc Classe ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document