A Different Marital Equality

2016 ◽  
pp. 139-153
Author(s):  
Jiping Zuo
Keyword(s):  
1998 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 799
Author(s):  
Judy Rollins Bohannon ◽  
Janice M. Steil
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (68) ◽  
pp. 105-109
Author(s):  
Justyna Łacny

The Deputies’ Bill on Marital Equality provides for the possibility of marriage between two people regardless of their sex. It introduces the possibility of adopting children by a single-sex couple. It does not regulate matrimonial property relationships. The opinion presents the jurisprudence of the ECtHR and international regulations which indicate that they do not contain a clear and commonly accepted definition of marriage. As a result, it cannot be claimed that the parliamentary draft law breaches, international law.


1998 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
SUSAN C. ROSENBLUTH ◽  
JANICE M. STEIL ◽  
JULIET H. WHITCOMB

During the past 20 years, the number of women and men who endorse egalitarian relationships has steadily increased. Yet, marital inequality continues to be the norm. Why the gap? In 41 structured interviews with respondents in dual-career marriages, domestic task sharing and decision making (the most salient criteria for social scientists) were the most frequently cited criteria for evaluating equality in marriages other than their own. However, in response to self-referential questions, relationship characteristics and attitudes (e.g., mutual respect, commitment, reciprocity, and supportiveness) were used more frequently than behavioral observations. Men and women were equally likely to endorse relationship equality as ideal. Women, however, rated equality as less important to men than men reported it to be, and men rated equality as more important to women than women reported it to be. The majority stated that equal relationships benefit both husbands and wives, but a significant minority emphasized the costs to men and benefits to women.


2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-189
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. McKinley
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-24
Author(s):  
Francine M. Deutsch
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 23-46
Author(s):  
Toni Schindler Zimmerman ◽  
Stephanie Crandall Seng ◽  
Leslie Parker Northen ◽  
John W. Grogan
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 146-172
Author(s):  
Xiaoqun Xu

Chapter 6 provides concrete cases in criminal and civil justice to flesh out the effects and defects of the reforms during the Republic (1912–1949). For criminal justice, it looks into how robbers and bandits were punished under a special law reminiscent of the imperial-era precedents and how Chinese collaborators working for the Japanese occupiers during the war (1937–1945) were prosecuted and punished after the war (1946–1949). For civil justice, the chapter focuses on marriage and divorce and the issue of concubines, showing the movement toward gender and marital equality and the agency of women in pushing for such changes and in using the law and courts to pursue their own interests.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document