Capital Flows in Korea after Capital Account Liberalization

2014 ◽  
pp. 83-116
Author(s):  
Hail Park ◽  
Daeyup Lee ◽  
Kyuil Chung
Policy Papers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (41) ◽  
Author(s):  

Executive Directors welcomed the report of the Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) on IMF Advice on Capital Flows. Directors appreciated the high quality of the report, and its thematic and background country studies. Directors welcomed the finding that the adoption of the Institutional View (IV), along with the development of other frameworks and additional tools, had represented a major advance in the Fund’s policy framework to provide systematic advice to member countries on the management of capital flows and capital account liberalization. Directors also noted the conclusion that, in its application, the Fund had generally followed the IV and other policy frameworks to ensure that the advice was consistent, tailored to country circumstances, and evenhanded across countries. Directors welcomed that capital flow management measures (CFMs) have generally not been used to substitute for warranted policy adjustments. Directors also welcomed the finding that most authorities broadly support the IV’s sequenced framework to capital account liberalization and appreciated the Fund’s specific advice in many cases, especially in the context of technical assistance. More recently, faced with the abrupt capital flow reversals during the COVID-19 crisis, Directors noted that emerging markets and developing economies generally followed a multi-pronged approach broadly consistent with the IV framework and made relatively little use of CFMs.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-82
Author(s):  
John Bosco Nnyanzi

Empirical literature suggests that while there is low but improving risk sharing in developed countries, risk sharing in the developing countries is low and has remained low. We confirm this observation using panel data for the period 1986–2011. Overall we find weak evidence that an increase in capital account liberalization reduces the dependence of idiosyncratic consumption on idiosyncratic gross domestic product (GDP) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). An interaction of capital account liberalization proxy with capital flows produces a mixed effect on consumption risk sharing, calling for caution in capital account liberalization policy design. On the other hand, while we find no evidence that financial integration, as measured by cross-border capital flows in terms of the ratio of foreign assets to GDP, is helpful in consumption risk sharing in SSA, equity appears to hold the potential of precipitating a reduction in consumption risk while foreign direct investment (FDI) and debt are particularly noticeable to have a facilitative role in unhinging idiosyncratic consumption from idiosyncratic output in East African Community (EAC) and Southern African Development Cooperation (SADC) regional groupings, respectively. FDI liabilities in particular elicit a significantly positive enhancement of risk sharing in EAC and are economically meaningful in SADC. The impact of individual assets and liabilities is overall mixed, both in SSA and regional groupings, pointing to an underdeveloped capital markets scenario in need of urgent attention in terms of well-planned policies and strategies directed towards developing competitive capital markets in Africa for purposes of risk sharing.


Policy Papers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (42) ◽  
Author(s):  

As noted in the report, the adoption of the IV represented a major advance in the IMF’s policy framework to provide advice on capital account liberalization and the management of capital flows. Before the adoption of the IV, there was no consistent framework to guide policy advice on these areas. The IV was a major step towards filling the gap existing at the time. It welcomed the economic benefits of capital flows while recognizing the risks associated with capital flow volatility, developed a playbook for safe capital account liberalization, and incorporated capital flow management measures (CFMs) into the policy toolkit. It also noted the importance of international cooperation on capital flow policies in allowing countries to harness the benefits of capital flows safely, while minimizing negative spillovers. It was a demonstration of the institution’s flexibility and willingness to embrace theoretical advances and lessons from experience.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry Eichengreen ◽  
Balazs Csonto ◽  
Asmaa ElGanainy ◽  
Zsoka Koczan

We review the debate on the association of financial globalization with inequality. We show that the within-country distributional impact of capital account liberalization is context specific and that different types of flows have different distributional effects. Their overall impact depends on the composition of capital flows, their interaction, and on broader economic and institutional conditions. A comprehensive set of policies – macroeconomic, financial and labor- and product-market specific – is important for facilitating wider sharing of the benefits of financial globalization.


2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bokyeong Park ◽  
Jiyoun An

The term “original sin” refers to countries that cannot take out foreign loans that are denominated in its own currency. This study investigates how capital account liberalization affects capital flow volatility in countries with and without original sin. Overall, we find that the level of capital openness increases capital flow volatility, and that countries with original sin experience additional volatility in their capital flows. When the data sample is limited to countries with high institutional quality, the difference remains between the two groups—confirming that the different effects of capital openness on volatility should be attributed to differences in the international status of currencies rather than in institutional quality. Emerging economies whose currencies are not internationalized should therefore be more cautious of capital account liberalization.


2004 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah M. Brooks

In the past three decades governments around the world have lowered barriers to international capital flows. This movement is widely attributed to the forces of globalization, as developed nations moved toward relative convergence on international financial openness. Yet developing nations with much to gain from openness to foreign investment moved only hesitantly and inconsistently in this direction. Analysis of two decades of capital account liberalization in Latin America and the OECD reveals that nations in Latin America with weaker domestic financial sectors face higher risks of transitional dislocations following liberalization and move less aggressively toward openness. In the OECD, by contrast, financial weakness is associated with greater movements toward capital account opening, as transitional costs are lower and governments are better equipped to ameliorate them. Examination of the transitional costs of liberalization thus helps to explain how market pressures may impede, rather than promote, market-oriented reform in Latin America.


2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (03) ◽  
pp. 1350022 ◽  
Author(s):  
SIONG HOOK LAW ◽  
W. N. W. AZMAN-SAINI

This study examines the impact of capital account liberalization on economic growth in Malaysia from 1970 to 2004. It uses two measures of capital account openness, namely de jure (an index of liberalization) and de facto (the volume of capital flows). The empirical results based on the modified growth model demonstrate that the de jure measure of capital account liberalization shows an adverse effect on growth in Malaysia. However, the de facto measure shows a robust positive effect on economic growth. The results also highlight that the effect of capital account liberalization on growth is contingent on a country's level of financial development and the quality of its institutions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document