scholarly journals Introducing the ASCE Journals’ Early Career Editorial Board

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 01619001
Author(s):  
Rao S. Govindaraju ◽  
Mohamed Hantush ◽  
Xuefeng Chu
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Danson ◽  
Paul McKenna

Abstract David Neely was an internationally recognised scientist who formed collaborations and friendships across the world. His passion for his work always shone through. He always made time for early-career scientists and became a mentor and supervisor to many. He was an active Editorial Board Member of the international journal High Power Laser Science and Engineering. Sadly, David was taken from us much too early. In this Editorial we pay tribute to his work through his publications in the journal.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 01619001
Author(s):  
Louise Comfort ◽  
Nasim Uddin
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa Cho ◽  
Shelly A Johnson ◽  
Carrie Schuman ◽  
Jennifer Adler ◽  
Oscar Gonzalez ◽  
...  

Despite women earning similar numbers of graduate degrees as men in STEM disciplines, they are underrepresented in upper level positions in both academia and industry. Editorial board memberships are an important example of such positions; membership is both a professional honor in recognition of achievement and an opportunity for professional advancement. We surveyed 10 highly regarded journals in environmental biology, natural resource management, and plant sciences to quantify the number of women on their editorial boards and in positions of editorial leadership (i.e., Associate Editors and Editors-in-Chief) from 1985-2013. We found that during this time period only 16% of editorial board members were women, with more pronounced disparities in positions of editorial leadership. Although the trend was towards improvement over time, there was surprising variation between journals, including those with similar disciplinary foci. While demographic changes in academia may reduce these disparities over time, we argue journals should proactively strive for gender parity on their editorial boards. This will both increase the number of women afforded the opportunities and benefits that accompany board membership and increase the number of role models and potential mentors for early-career scientists and students.


Author(s):  
Larissa A. Shimoda ◽  
Chunxue Bai ◽  
Nathan W Bartlett ◽  
Julie A. Bastarache ◽  
Carol A Feghali-Bostwick ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charl de Villiers ◽  
John Dumay

Purpose – This article aims to focus on areas that can potentially improve a manuscript’s chances of success, i.e. acceptance for publication. In particular, we deal with topic selection, as well as aspects that can improve the manuscript during the writing phase, including the style of prose and citations. Design/methodology/approach – Recommendations are based on a review of the literature and our own experience. To demonstrate the practical application of the issues that need to be dealt with, examples have been provided from research articles published during 2010 in Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) and Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal (AAAJ). Findings – There are some common reasons for rejection that can be avoided, but one of the most important issues is to ensure that the research question is novel and that this novelty is made explicit in the introduction to the manuscript. The novelty–rigour curve (or NR curve) is introduced and the relationship between novelty and rigour, as it relates to a manuscript’s likelihood of acceptance for publication, is explained. The assessment of the prose used in published articles reveals that there are no set rules. Research limitations/implications – This article does not reveal guaranteed recipes for success, except that careful consideration and motivation of the novelty and rigour of the research undertaken are important. The authors suggest research into reviewer behavioural aspects as a possible avenue for future research. Originality/value – The novelty-rigour curve that depicts and explains the requirements of, and relationship between, these two research attributes is introduced. This article is novel because the prose of research articles published in AOS and AAAJ is critically examine in an attempt to assist both early career researchers to break into the top tier of accounting journals and established academics to enhance their chances of success. As such, the article has practical value for accounting academics and may also stimulate discussion among reviewers, editorial board members and editors, thereby playing a role in developing the field of accounting academic publishing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document