Discussion of “Ammonia Nitrogen Losses from Streams”

1969 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
pp. 974-978
Author(s):  
Wilber A. Blain
2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalil Tubail ◽  
Liming Chen ◽  
Frederick C. Michel ◽  
Harold M. Keener ◽  
Jerome F. Rigot ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
pp. 1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. Redding

Ammonia volatilisation from manure materials within poultry sheds can adversely affect production, and also represents a loss of fertiliser value from the spent litter. This study sought to compare the ability of alum and bentonite to decrease volatilisation losses of ammonia from spent poultry litter. An in-vessel volatilisation trial with air flushing, ammonia collection, and ammonia analysis was conducted over 64 days to evaluate the mitigation potential of these two materials. Water-saturated spent litter was incubated at 25°C in untreated condition (control) or with three treatments: an industry-accepted rate of alum [4% Al2(SO4)3·18H2O by dry mass of litter dry mass; ALUM], air-dry bentonite (127% by dry mass; BENT), or water-saturated bentonite (once again at 127% by dry mass; SATBENT). A high proportion of the nitrogen contained in the untreated spent litter was volatilised (62%). Bentonite additions were superior to alum additions at retaining spent litter ammonia (nitrogen losses: 15%, SATBENT; 34%, BENT; 54%, ALUM). Where production considerations favour comparable high rates of bentonite addition (e.g. where the litter is to be re-formulated as a fertiliser), this clay has potential to decrease ammonia volatilisation either in-shed or in spent litter stockpiles or formulated products, without the associated detrimental effect of alum on phosphorus availability.


Agronomy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2384
Author(s):  
María Soto-Herranz ◽  
Mercedes Sánchez-Báscones ◽  
Juan Manuel Antolín-Rodríguez ◽  
Pablo Martín-Ramos

Nitrogen losses during composting processes lead to emissions problems and reduce the compost fertilizer value. Gas-permeable membranes (GPM) are a promising approach to address the challenge of reducing nitrogen losses in composting processes. This study investigated the applicability of two GPM membrane systems to recover N released during the closed composting process of laying hen manure. The ammonia (NH3) capture process was performed using two different systems over a period of 44 days: the first system (S1) consisted of 120 m of an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membrane installed inside a 3.7 m3 portable, closed aerobic composter with forced ventilation; the second system (S2) consisted of 474 m of an ePTFE membrane placed inside as an external module designed for NH3 capture, connected to a closed aerobic composter through a pipe. In both cases, a 1 N H2SO4 acidic NH3 capture solution was circulated inside the membranes at a flow rate of 2.1 L·h−1. The amount of total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) recovered was similar in the two systems (0.61 kg in S1 and 0.65 kg in S2) due to the chosen membrane surface areas, but the TAN recovery rate was six times higher in system S1 (6.9 g TAN·m−2·day−1) than in system S2 (1.9 g TAN·m−2·day−1) due to the presence of a higher NH3 concentration in the air in contact with the membrane. Given that the NH3 concentration in the atmosphere of the membrane compartment directly influences the NH3 capture, better performance of the GPM recovery system may be attained by installing it directly inside the closed aerobic composters. Regardless of the chosen configuration, this technology allows N recovery as a stable and concentrated 1.4% N ammonium salt solution, which can be used for fertigation. The presented GPM systems may be used in community composting systems with low volumes of waste to be treated or in livestock facilities that have implemented best available techniques such as solid–liquid separation or anaerobic digestion, provided that the use of GPM technology in combination with these techniques also contributes to odor mitigation and improves biogas yields.


1968 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 1085-1092
Author(s):  
Frank E. Stratton

1973 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. L. Hooker ◽  
G. A. Peterson ◽  
D. H. Sander

2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 15-17
Author(s):  
Tai Maaz ◽  
Alison Eagle

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 2261-2266
Author(s):  
Xiaowei Li ◽  
Jie Zhang ◽  
Weiwei Zhao ◽  
Xuewen Yi ◽  
Wei Lin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document