Presolar Stardust in the Solar System: Implications for Nucleosynthesis and Galactic Chemical Evolution

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry R. Nittler ◽  
Takuma Suda ◽  
Takaya Nozawa ◽  
Akira Ohnishi ◽  
Kiyoshi Kato ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Bonsor ◽  
John Harrison ◽  
Oliver Shorttle ◽  
Philip Carter ◽  
Mihkel Kama ◽  
...  

<p><strong>Volatile loss, Differentiation and Collisions: Key to the Composition of Rocky Exoplanets</strong></p> <p>Many of the key characteristics and geology of our planet Earth today were determined during the planet’s formation. What about rocky exoplanets? How does rocky planet formation determine the properties, composition, geology and ultimately, presence of life on rocky exoplanets?<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></p> <p>In this talk I will discuss projects that investigate the link between rocky planet formation and the composition of rocky exoplanets. This work utilises unique observations that provide us with the bulk composition of rocky exoplanetary material. These observations come from the old, faint remnants of stars like our Sun, known as white dwarfs.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></p> <p>White dwarfs should have clean hydrogen or helium atmospheres. This means that planetary bodies as small as asteroids can show up in the white dwarf’s atmosphere. Metallic species such as Fe, Mg or Ca provide the bulk composition of the accreted body. Several thousand polluted white dwarfs are now known.</p> <p>Models indicate that outer planetary systems, like our Solar System beyond Mars, should survive the star’s evolution to the white dwarf phase. Scattering is a common process, and any bodies that are scattered inwards, a bit like sun-grazing comets in our Solar System, would show up in the white dwarf atmosphere.</p> <p><strong>What determines the composition of the rocky exoplanetary bodies accreted by white dwarfs?<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></strong></p> <p>Models presented in Harrison et al, 2018, 2020 (submitted) find that the abundances observed in the atmospheres of white dwarfs can be explained by three key processes, notably galactic chemical evolution, loss of volatiles (thermal processing) and large scale melting<span class="Apple-converted-space">  </span>which leads to the segregation of material between the core, mantle and crust. Galactic chemical evolution determines the initial composition of the planet forming material. Thermal processing determines the loss of volatiles, be that CO and other gases, water, or moderate volatile species such as Na. Collisions between planetary bodies that have differentiated to form a core can lead to fragments dominated by core-rich or mantle-rich material.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></p> <p><strong>Core-Mantle differentiation is a common process in exoplanetary systems</strong></p> <p>High abundances of siderophile (iron-loving) compared to lithophile (silicate loving) speeches in some polluted white dwarfs indicate that accretion of a planetary body composed primarily of material from a planetary core (or alternatively mantle). Harrison et al, 2020, based on data from Hollands et al, 2017, 2018, present several examples of systems with extreme abundances, core-rich, mantle-rich or crust-rich.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></p> <p>Bonsor et al, 2020 concludes that most polluted white dwarfs (>60%) have accreted the fragment of a differentiated exoplanetesimal.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></p> <p><strong>Post-Nebula volatilisation in exoplanetary bodies</strong></p> <p>Mn and Na trace the loss of volatiles in planetary bodies. The difference in behaviour of Mn and Na under oxidising/reducing conditions makes them a strong indicator of the conditions prevalent when volatile loss occurred. Mn/Na for the Moon/Mars indicate post-Nebula volatile loss<span class="Apple-converted-space">  </span>(Siebert et al, 2018). Harrison et al, 2020, in prep, provides the first evidence of post-nebula volatilisation in exoplanetary bodies utilising the Mn/Na abundances of polluted white dwarfs.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></p>


2012 ◽  
Vol 759 (1) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Lugaro ◽  
Kurt Liffman ◽  
Trevor R. Ireland ◽  
Sarah T. Maddison

Author(s):  
Katharina Lodders

Solar elemental abundances, or solar system elemental abundances, refer to the complement of chemical elements in the entire Solar System. The Sun contains more than 99% of the mass in the solar system and therefore the composition of the Sun is a good proxy for the composition of the overall solar system. The solar system composition can be taken as the overall composition of the molecular cloud within the interstellar medium from which the solar system formed 4.567 billion years ago. Active research areas in astronomy and cosmochemistry model collapse of a molecular cloud of solar composition into a star with a planetary system and the physical and chemical fractionation of the elements during planetary formation and differentiation. The solar system composition is the initial composition from which all solar system objects (the Sun, terrestrial planets, gas giant planets, planetary satellites and moons, asteroids, Kuiper-belt objects, and comets) were derived. Other dwarf stars (with hydrostatic hydrogen-burning in their cores) like the Sun (type G2V dwarf star) within the solar neighborhood have compositions similar to the Sun and the solar system composition. In general, differential comparisons of stellar compositions provide insights about stellar evolution as functions of stellar mass and age and ongoing nucleosynthesis but also about galactic chemical evolution when elemental compositions of stellar populations across the Milky Way Galaxy is considered. Comparisons to solar composition can reveal element destruction (e.g., Li) in the Sun and in other dwarf stars. The comparisons also show element production of, for example, C, N, O, and the heavy elements made by the s-process in low to intermediate mass stars (3–7 solar masses) after these evolved from their dwarf-star stage into red giant stars (where hydrogen and helium burning can occur in shells around their cores). The solar system abundances are and have been a critical test composition for nucleosynthesis models and models of galactic chemical evolution, which aim ultimately to track the production of the elements heavier than hydrogen and helium in the generation of stars that came forth after the Big Bang 13.4 billion years ago.


2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Serminato ◽  
Roberto Gallino ◽  
Claudia Travaglio ◽  
Sara Bisterzo ◽  
Oscar Straniero

AbstractWe follow the chemical evolution of the Galaxy for the s elements using a Galactic chemical evolution (GCE) model, as already discussed by Travaglio et al. (1999, 2001, 2004), with a full updated network and refined asymptotic giant branch (AGB) models. Calculations of the s contribution to each isotope at the epoch of the formation of the solar system is determined by following the GCE contribution by AGB stars only. Then, using the r-process residual method we determine for each isotope their solar system r-process fraction, and recalculate the GCE contribution of heavy elements accounting for both the s and r process. We compare our results with spectroscopic abundances at various metallicities of [Sr,Y,Zr/Fe], of [Ba,La/Fe], of [Pb/Fe], typical of the three s-process peaks, as well as of [Eu/Fe], which in turn is a typical r-process element. Analysis of the various uncertainties involved in these calculations are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1668 (1) ◽  
pp. 012008
Author(s):  
Benoit Côté ◽  
Pavel Denissenkov ◽  
Falk Herwig ◽  
Chris L. Fryer ◽  
Krzysztof Belczynski ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document