Multiple spindle cell lipomas and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans within a single patient: Evidence for a common neoplastic process of interstitial dendritic cells?

2003 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff D. Harvell
Pathologica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 87-91
Author(s):  
G. M. Vecchio ◽  
G. Broggi ◽  
A. Mulè ◽  
E. Piombino ◽  
G. Magro

OTO Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473974X2110614
Author(s):  
Sonika Dhari Shrestha ◽  
Uma Bhatta ◽  
Anuj Kayastha ◽  
Tridip Bahadur Pantha

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanobar Yasmeen Mohammed ◽  
Qandeel Sadiq ◽  
David Mcgregor ◽  
Farhan Khan

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-300
Author(s):  
Philippe Drabent ◽  
Sylvie Fraitag

The diagnosis of cutaneous and subcutaneous spindle cell neoplasms in children is often challenging and has potential therapeutic and prognostic implications. Although correctly diagnosing dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and infantile fibrosarcoma is paramount, pathologists should not ignore a number of diagnostic pitfalls linked to mostly rare tumors with completely different clinical outcomes. In the last decade, a spectrum of novel entities has been described; information from molecular biology has helped to shape this new landscape for spindle cell tumors. Here, we review the most noteworthy neoplasms in this spectrum, with a focus on their histological similarities: fibroblastic connective tissue nevus, medallion-like dermal dendrocyte hamartoma, or plaque-like CD34-positive dermal fibroma, which share features with fibrous hamartoma of infancy; lipofibromatosis and lipofibromatosis-like neural tumor; and plexiform myofibroblastoma, a recently described neoplasm that should be distinguished from plexiform fibrohistiocytic tumor. These tumors also have genetic similarities, particularly gene rearrangements involving NTRK3 or NTRK1. These genetic features are not only essential for the differential diagnosis of infantile fibrosarcoma but are also of diagnostic value for lipofibromatosis-like neural tumors. The more recently described RET, RAF1, and BRAF gene fusions are also discussed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew W. McGee ◽  
Sarag A. Boukhar ◽  
Varun Monga ◽  
Ronald Weigel ◽  
Sneha D. Phadke

Abstract Background Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is a rare soft tissue malignancy that, if left untreated, can be locally destructive and life-threatening. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is uncommon in the breast, and the similarity of its morphologic features with other spindle cell malignancies can make correct identification difficult. Immunohistochemistry and molecular testing can aid in the correct diagnosis when there is diagnostic uncertainty. Imatinib, a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been used for adjuvant treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans following surgical resection. When used as a neoadjuvant treatment, imatinib offers the opportunity to decrease tumor size prior to surgery to lessen the chance for disfigurement. Case presentation We present the case of a Caucasian woman who was 46-year-old when she first noted a mass in her right breast in 2015; she was initially diagnosed as having metaplastic breast carcinoma. Mastectomy and systemic chemotherapy were planned; however, after review of pathology at a referral center, the diagnosis was changed to dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. She was treated with 4 months of neoadjuvant imatinib with adequate tumor shrinkage to perform breast conservation. Conclusion This patient’s case stresses the importance of correctly diagnosing this rare breast tumor through the histopathologic appearance of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, molecular pathogenesis, and immunohistochemistry. These techniques can help differentiate dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans from metaplastic breast carcinoma and other spindle cell lesions of the breast. This is critical, as the treatment options for metaplastic breast carcinoma significantly differ from treatment options for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. This case describes the use of imatinib as a neoadjuvant option to reduce preoperative tumor size and improve surgical outcomes.


2007 ◽  
Vol 131 (10) ◽  
pp. 1532-1540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas P. Plesec ◽  
Richard A. Prayson

Abstract Context.—Frozen section (FS) evaluation of central nervous system (CNS) lesions provides an assessment of specimen adequacy and facilitates triage for ancillary studies. Frozen section also provides an accurate preliminary diagnosis; however, certain lesions are recognized to cause diagnostic challenges at FS. Objective.—To identify cases in which there was a discrepancy between the FS diagnosis and final diagnosis in the case to heighten awareness of common diagnostic pitfalls in surgical neuropathology. Design.—All CNS FS cases involving a tumor diagnosis at FS or permanent section (N = 2156) from September 1997 until June 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Discrepancies between the FS and final diagnoses were identified. Results.—Of the 2156 cases identified, 57 (2.7%) discrepant diagnoses were found. Twelve (21.1%) of 57 discrepancies involved errors in classification of spindle cell lesions, most commonly confusing schwannomas or meningiomas with other lesions. Twelve (21.1%) of 57 cases involved errors in differentiating oligodendrogliomas from astrocytomas. Nine (15.8%) of 57 discrepancies involved errors in the diagnosis of CNS lymphoma. Eight (14.0%) of 57 cases involved errors in differentiating reactive from neoplastic processes, most frequently gliosis versus glioma. Four (7.0%) of 57 discrepancies involved errors in the overgrading of tumors. The remaining 12 (21.1%) of 57 cases included an assortment of other discrepancies. Conclusions.—Frozen section of CNS neoplastic processes can be highly accurate. Less than 3% of FS diagnoses in 1 institution's experience were discrepant with the final diagnoses. Approximately 80% of the discrepant cases were classified into 5 categories: spindle cell lesions, astrocytoma versus oligodendroglioma, differential diagnosis of CNS lymphoma, reactive versus neoplastic process, and tumor overgrading. Awareness of these pitfalls may help in further increasing diagnostic accuracy.


Author(s):  
Tomoaki Imai ◽  
Masahiro Michizawa ◽  
Hidetaka Shimizu ◽  
Takumi Imai ◽  
Naonori Yamamoto ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 252
Author(s):  
Eliana Piombino ◽  
Giuseppe Broggi ◽  
Mattia Barbareschi ◽  
Sergio Castorina ◽  
Rosalba Parenti ◽  
...  

Purpose: to investigate the immunohistochemical expression and distribution of Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) (transcription factor produced by the tumor suppressor gene of the same name) in a series of 114 cases of bland-looking mesenchymal spindle cell lesions of the dermis/subcutaneous tissues to establish whether this immunomarker is differentially expressed in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) versus its potential morphological mimickers. Methods: This retrospective multi-centric immunohistochemical study included 57 DFSP cases, 15 dermatofibromas, 5 deep fibrous histiocytomas, 8 neurofibromas, 5 spindle cell lipomas, 8 dermal scars, 6 nodular fasciitis, 5 cutaneous leiomyomas and 5 solitary fibrous tumors. Among the 57 DFSP cases, 11 were recurrent lesions; 2 non-recurrent cases exhibited an additional “fibrosarcomatous” overgrowth and 1 recurrent and 2 primary tumors contained a minority of “giant cell fibroblastoma” components. Results: Most DFSP (95% of cases) exhibited cytoplasmic staining for WT1; 11/11 residual/recurrent tumors showed diffuse and strong WT1 cytoplasmic immunoreactivity; apart from neurofibromas, WT1 expression was lacking in all the other cases studied. Conclusions: The cytoplasmic expression of WT1 may be exploitable as a complementary diagnostic immunomarker to CD34 in confirming the diagnosis of DFSP and to better evaluate the residual/recurrent tumor component.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document