Rotation of coordinate system and differentiation of integrals with respect to translation-invariant bases

2017 ◽  
Vol 208 (4) ◽  
pp. 510-530
Author(s):  
G G Oniani ◽  
K A Chubinidze
Keyword(s):  
Coordinate System ◽  
Translation Invariant ◽  
Differentiation Of Integrals

On sets of singular rotations for translation invariant differentiation bases formed by intervals

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-131
Author(s):  
Giorgi Oniani ◽  
Kakha Chubinidze
Keyword(s):  
Coordinate System ◽  
Summable Function ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Translation Invariant ◽  
Symmetric Structure ◽  
Indefinite Integral ◽  
Differential Properties ◽  
Invariant Differentiation

AbstractWe study the dependence of differential properties of an indefinite integral on a rotation of the coordinate system. Namely, the following problem is studied: For a summable function f, what kind of a set may be the set of rotations θ for which {\int f} is not differentiable with respect to the θ-rotation of a given basis B? For translation invariant bases B formed by two-dimensional intervals, some classes of sets of singular rotations are found. In particular, for such bases with symmetric structure, a characterization of at most countable sets of singular rotations is found.

Reference Coordinate System Requirements for Geophysics

1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 87-92
Author(s):  
P. L. Bender
Keyword(s):  
Coordinate System ◽  
Polar Motion ◽  
Main Part ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Angular Motion ◽  
Coordinate Systems ◽  
Axis Of Rotation ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Fixed System

AbstractFive important geodynamical quantities which are closely linked are: 1) motions of points on the Earth’s surface; 2)polar motion; 3) changes in UT1-UTC; 4) nutation; and 5) motion of the geocenter. For each of these we expect to achieve measurements in the near future which have an accuracy of 1 to 3 cm or 0.3 to 1 milliarcsec.From a metrological point of view, one can say simply: “Measure each quantity against whichever coordinate system you can make the most accurate measurements with respect to”. I believe that this statement should serve as a guiding principle for the recommendations of the colloquium. However, it also is important that the coordinate systems help to provide a clear separation between the different phenomena of interest, and correspond closely to the conceptual definitions in terms of which geophysicists think about the phenomena.In any discussion of angular motion in space, both a “body-fixed” system and a “space-fixed” system are used. Some relevant types of coordinate systems, reference directions, or reference points which have been considered are: 1) celestial systems based on optical star catalogs, distant galaxies, radio source catalogs, or the Moon and inner planets; 2) the Earth’s axis of rotation, which defines a line through the Earth as well as a celestial reference direction; 3) the geocenter; and 4) “quasi-Earth-fixed” coordinate systems.When a geophysicists discusses UT1 and polar motion, he usually is thinking of the angular motion of the main part of the mantle with respect to an inertial frame and to the direction of the spin axis. Since the velocities of relative motion in most of the mantle are expectd to be extremely small, even if “substantial” deep convection is occurring, the conceptual “quasi-Earth-fixed” reference frame seems well defined. Methods for realizing a close approximation to this frame fortunately exist. Hopefully, this colloquium will recommend procedures for establishing and maintaining such a system for use in geodynamics. Motion of points on the Earth’s surface and of the geocenter can be measured against such a system with the full accuracy of the new techniques.The situation with respect to celestial reference frames is different. The various measurement techniques give changes in the orientation of the Earth, relative to different systems, so that we would like to know the relative motions of the systems in order to compare the results. However, there does not appear to be a need for defining any new system. Subjective figures of merit for the various system dependon both the accuracy with which measurements can be made against them and the degree to which they can be related to inertial systems.The main coordinate system requirement related to the 5 geodynamic quantities discussed in this talk is thus for the establishment and maintenance of a “quasi-Earth-fixed” coordinate system which closely approximates the motion of the main part of the mantle. Changes in the orientation of this system with respect to the various celestial systems can be determined by both the new and the conventional techniques, provided that some knowledge of changes in the local vertical is available. Changes in the axis of rotation and in the geocenter with respect to this system also can be obtained, as well as measurements of nutation.

2.2. Working Group 2: Conceptual Definitions of Reference Coordinate Systems for Earth Dynamics

1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 21-26
Keyword(s):  
Coordinate System ◽  
Working Group ◽  
General Character ◽  
Coordinate Systems ◽  
Reference Coordinate System ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Earth Dynamics

An ideal definition of a reference coordinate system should meet the following general requirements:1. It should be as conceptually simple as possible, so its philosophy is well understood by the users.2. It should imply as few physical assumptions as possible. Wherever they are necessary, such assumptions should be of a very general character and, in particular, they should not be dependent upon astronomical and geophysical detailed theories.3. It should suggest a materialization that is dynamically stable and is accessible to observations with the required accuracy.

Cordic Design For Circular and Linear Coordinate System

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 224-227
Author(s):  
Femina P T Femina P T ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Coordinate System

Translation-Invariant Gibbs Measures for the Blum-Kapel Model on a Cayley Tree

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nosir Khatamov ◽  
◽  
Rustam Khakimov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cayley Tree ◽  
Gibbs Measures ◽  
Translation Invariant

The Calder´on-Zygmund Theory I: Ellipticity

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Street
Keyword(s):  
Classical Theory ◽  
Singular Integral ◽  
Singular Integrals ◽  
Differential Operators ◽  
Integral Operators ◽  
Singular Integral Operators ◽  
Single Parameter ◽  
Partial Differential ◽  
Translation Invariant ◽  
Partial Differential Operators

This chapter discusses a case for single-parameter singular integral operators, where ρ‎ is the usual distance on ℝn. There, we obtain the most classical theory of singular integrals, which is useful for studying elliptic partial differential operators. The chapter defines singular integral operators in three equivalent ways. This trichotomy can be seen three times, in increasing generality: Theorems 1.1.23, 1.1.26, and 1.2.10. This trichotomy is developed even when the operators are not translation invariant (many authors discuss such ideas only for translation invariant, or nearly translation invariant operators). It also presents these ideas in a slightly different way than is usual, which helps to motivate later results and definitions.

Shoulder Joint Motion Analysis of Daily Living Activities Using a Global Coordinate System

2013 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 840-844
Author(s):  
Yukiya INOUE ◽  
Mayumi KIHARA ◽  
Junko YOSHIMURA ◽  
Naoki YOSHIDA ◽  
Kenji MATSUMOTO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coordinate System ◽  
Motion Analysis ◽  
Shoulder Joint ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Global Coordinate System ◽  
Joint Motion ◽  
Daily Living Activities
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document