scholarly journals Guest Editorial: Getting Evidence into Policy - Stimulating Debate and Building the Evidence Base

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Nicholas Glasgow ◽  
Lucio Naccarella

In this special edition of the Journal, we have brought together papers with the aim of contributing to primary health care reform in Australia. The papers will stimulate further debate and increase the evidence base through which policies can be informed. Does primary health care in Australia need reform? Are there fundamental problems with the health system demanding a reform response? The challenges confronting Australia's health care system over the next decade are real and well documented (Productivity Commission, 2005; Australian Medical Workforce Advisory Committee [AMWAC], 2005). They include the ageing population and longer life expectancies, the increasing prevalence of chronic illness and co-morbidity, heightened consumer expectations, advances in health technologies and shortages in the health workforce.

In this study, they presented the analysis of current views on the important link in medical care provision to the population, namely, primary health care. According to the Alma-Ata Declaration on the organization of primary health care this type of medical assistance has made it possible to carry out reforms within this area in many countries, which has led to effective results (the reduction of infant mortality, the increase of life expectancy and a number of other indicators). In this paper, they performed the analysis of Russian and foreign sources of literature on the topic under study between 1978 and 2018. It has been established that primary health care is regarded as the most effective instrument of health protection than specialized medical care according to the experience of Russian Federation, a number of countries in Europe, Asia and the African continent, Australia and the United States. The performed analysis clearly shows that the experience of some countries demonstrates the correlation between the general coverage of primary health care and the achievement of public health indicative indicators. At the same time, the question is raised about the expediency of certain aspect replacement concerning the provision of specialized medical care by the doctors of general practice, i.e. primary health care. The obtained results can be interpreted as an evidence base for the necessity and an undeniable effectiveness of primary health care as a central link in the health care system.


2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Vivian Lin

The primary health care sector faces a number of challenges. Some of these are in the form of persistent problems which include, inter alia, health disparities in resources and outcomes, a fragmented health system, issues of power with respect to priority setting and resource allocation, and a poor information and evidence base with which to allocate resources and evaluate outcomes. These problems are perennially accompanied by a gap between the rhetoric of policy and the reality of implementation. Neo-liberal reforms present a series of challenges to primary health, with the introduction of unit-cost funding, competitive tendering and increased user pays. Changing epidemiological patterns, the rise of evidence-based medicine, and new information and communication technology all question accepted methods of practice. Eroding community confidence in government and professionals, and the growing polarisation of society are also cause for concern. Three areas for development in primary health care policy and practice may provide the keys for dealing with these challenges. These are, first, the development of integrated service delivery models, which move away from narrowly defined single purpose programs delivered by one provider. Second, the development of innovative policy and managerial tools that support the objectives of primary health care while addressing the concerns of policy makers. Finally, the development of a strategic research and development agenda that effectively links policy, research and practice.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 138-138
Author(s):  
A. Bener

AimTo determine the prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders in Qatari population who attend the primary health care settings and examine their symptoms patterns and co-morbidity.DesignA cross sectional.SettingPrimary health care center, QatarSubjectsA total of 2080 Qatari subjects aged 18 to 65 years were approached and 1660 (79.8%) patients participated in this study.MethodsThe study was based on a face to face interview with a designed diagnostic screening questionnaire which consists of 17 questions about symptoms and signs of anxiety and depression disorders. Physicians determined the definitive diagnosis for depression and anxiety disorders by further checking and screening their symptoms.ResultsThe overall prevalence of depression and anxiety disorder was 13.5% and 10.3% respectively. Qatari women were at higher risk for depression (53.1% vs 46.9%) and anxiety disorder (56.7% vs 43.3%) compared to men. More than half of the sufferers with anxiety (56.7%) and depression (53.1%) were Qatari women with a higher frequency in the age group 1834 years. There were significant differences between men and women with depression in terms of age group (p = 0.004), marital status (p = 0.04), occupation (p < 0.001) and household income (p = 0.002). Nervousness was the most common symptom in subjects with anxiety disorders (68.4%), whereas sleep difficulty was the most common symptom in subjects with depressive disorder (59.4%).ConclusionThe depression was more prevalent in Qatari than anxiety disorders. The high risk groups of depression and anxiety disorders were being female, married, middle aged and highly educated.


2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J. Schluter ◽  
Paul Bridgford ◽  
Lynley Cook ◽  
Greg Hamilton

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolette Sheridan ◽  
Mary Finlayson ◽  
Mark Jones

Author(s):  
Jessy Donelle ◽  
Ahmed Bayoumi ◽  
Lisa Boucher ◽  
Alana Martin ◽  
Dave Pineau ◽  
...  

IntroductionEngagement in primary health care may be lower among marginalized people who use drugs (PWUD) compared to the general population, despite having greater mental and physical healthcare needs as evidenced by higher co-morbidity, and more frequent use of emergency department care. Objectives and ApproachWe investigated which socio-structural factors were related to primary care engagement among PWUD using rich survey data from the Participatory Research in Ottawa: Understanding Drugs cohort study; these data were deterministically linked to several robust provincial-level health administrative databases held at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences. We defined primary care engagement over the 2 years prior to survey completion (March-December 2013) as: not engaged (<3 outpatient visits to the same family physician) versus engaged in care (3+ outpatient visits to the same family physician). Multi-variable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with primary health care engagement. ResultsAmong 663 participants, characteristics include: mean age of 41.4 years, 75.6% male, 66.7% in the lowest two income quintiles, and 51.1% with 6+ co-morbidities. 372 (56%) were engaged in primary care, with a mean of 15.97 visits per year (SD=20.18). Engagement was significantly associated with the following factors: receiving drug benefits from either the Ontario Disability Support Program (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 4.48; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 2.64 to 7.60) or Ontario Works (AOR 3.41; 95%CI 1.96 to 5.91), having ever taken methadone (AOR 3.05; 95%CI 1.92 to 4.87), mental health co-morbidity (AOR 2.93; 95%CI 1.97 to 4.36), engaging in sex work in the last 12 months (AOR 2.05; 95%CI 1.01 to 4.13), and having stable housing (AOR 1.98; 95%CI 1.30 to 3.01). Conclusion/ImplicationsNearly half of PWUD are not engaged in primary care, representing missed opportunities to improve health. Engagement in primary care may reflect both an increased need for health care, such as mental health disability, and increased access to primary care through other health and social services, such as housing support.


2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 911-922
Author(s):  
N. S. Al Haddad ◽  
T. A. Al Habeeb ◽  
M. H. Abdel Gadir ◽  
Y. S. Al Ghamdy ◽  
N. A. Qureshi

Prevalence, sociodemographic patterns and medical co-morbidity of smoking among a cross-section of primary health care [PHC] clients in Saudi Arabia were examined. We used a 44-item semistructured questionnaire to collect data from 1752 patients at 25 randomly selected PHC centres. Percentage of smoking was 52.3%. Although 85% were adult smokers, 8.6% began smoking before age 12. Smokers gave overlapping reasons to smoke including peer pressure; non-smokers gave religious and health logics against smoking. Of all smokers, 92.8% wanted to learn cessation strategies, 11.8% were ignorant of hazards and 32.4% reported manifestations of nicotine withdrawal. Besides alcohol use [13.4%], 81.8% had co-morbid physical disease


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document