scholarly journals Two Eukaryotic Initiation Factors (IF-I and IF-II) of Protein Synthesis that Are Required to Form an Initiation Complex with Rabbit Reticulocyte Ribosomes

1974 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 436-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. M. Cashion ◽  
W. M. Stanley
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Initiation Complex ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factors

scholarly journals Eukaryotic initiation factors and protein synthesis after resistance exercise in rats

2000 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 1036-1042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Farrell ◽  
Jazmir M. Hernandez ◽  
Mark J. Fedele ◽  
Thomas C. Vary ◽  
Scot R. Kimball ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Sprague Dawley ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factors ◽  
Sprague Dawley Rats ◽  
Arterial Plasma ◽  
Response To Exercise

Translational control of protein synthesis depends on numerous eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) and we have previously shown ( Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 276: E721–E727, 1999) that increases in one factor, eIF2B, are associated with increases in rates of protein synthesis after resistance exercise in rats. In the present study we investigated whether the eIF4E family of initiation factors is also involved with an anabolic response to exercise. Male Sprague-Dawley rats either remained sedentary ( n = 6) or performed acute resistance exercise ( n = 6), and rates of protein synthesis were assessed in vivo 16 h after the last session of resistance exercise. eIF4E complexed to eIF4G (eIF4E ⋅ eIF4G), eIF4E binding protein 1 (4E-BP1) complexed to eIF4E, and phosphorylation state of eIF4E and 4E-BP1 (γ-form) were assessed in gastrocnemius. Rates of protein synthesis were higher in exercised rats compared with sedentary rats [205 ± 8 (SE) vs. 164 ± 5.5 nmol phenylalanine incorporated ⋅ g muscle−1 ⋅ h−1, respectively; P < 0.05]. Arterial plasma insulin concentrations were not different between the two groups. A trend ( P = 0.09) for an increase in eIF4E ⋅ eIF4G with exercise was noted; however, no statistically significant differences were observed in any of the components of the eIF4E family in response to resistance exercise. These new data, along with our previous report on eIF2B, suggest that the regulation of peptide chain initiation after exercise is more dependent on eIF2B than on the eIF4E system.

Hypoxanthine-xanthine oxidase-related defect in polypeptide chain initiation by endothelium

1989 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 450-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Jornot ◽  
A. F. Junod
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Xanthine Oxidase ◽  
Rna Synthesis ◽  
Polypeptide Chain ◽  
Total Proteins ◽  
Initiation Complex ◽  
Chain Initiation ◽  
Oxidase System ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Related Defect

After exposure to O2 intermediates generated by the hypoxanthine-xanthine oxidase system (HX-XO), the rate of [3H]phenylalanine incorporation into total proteins in cultured endothelial cells was markedly reduced. This reduction, which was prevented by catalase, could not be explained by 1) changes in amino acid pools, 2) increased rate of degradation of newly synthesized proteins, 3) impaired poly(A)+ RNA synthesis and efficiency, 4) decreased rate of amino acylation. On the other hand, the increase in the monoribosome-to-polyribosome ratio suggested that translation was affected at the level of chain initiation. Further analysis indicated that 40S initiation complex formation was normal, whereas the assembly of 80S initiation complex was inhibited. Results from reconstitution experiments showed that both normal and treated ribosomes could support normal protein synthesis in the presence of normal initiation factors (IFs). In contrast, IFs from HX-XO lysates did not support normal protein synthesis with ribosomes from either source. Thus, the effect of XO treatment on protein synthesis appears to be an initiation defect related to decreased IF activity and/or availability.

scholarly journals O-GlcNAcylation of core components of the translation initiation machinery regulates protein synthesis

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (16) ◽  
pp. 7857-7866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuexia Li ◽  
Qiang Zhu ◽  
Xiaoliu Shi ◽  
Yaxian Cheng ◽  
Xueliu Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Soft Agar ◽  
Initiation Complex ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
Core Components

Protein synthesis is essential for cell growth, proliferation, and survival. Protein synthesis is a tightly regulated process that involves multiple mechanisms. Deregulation of protein synthesis is considered as a key factor in the development and progression of a number of diseases, such as cancer. Here we show that the dynamic modification of proteins by O-linked β-N-acetyl-glucosamine (O-GlcNAcylation) regulates translation initiation by modifying core initiation factors eIF4A and eIF4G, respectively. Mechanistically, site-specific O-GlcNAcylation of eIF4A on Ser322/323 disrupts the formation of the translation initiation complex by perturbing its interaction with eIF4G. In addition, O-GlcNAcylation inhibits the duplex unwinding activity of eIF4A, leading to impaired protein synthesis, and decreased cell proliferation. In contrast, site-specific O-GlcNAcylation of eIF4G on Ser61 promotes its interaction with poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) and poly(A) mRNA. Depletion of eIF4G O-GlcNAcylation results in inhibition of protein synthesis, cell proliferation, and soft agar colony formation. The differential glycosylation of eIF4A and eIF4G appears to be regulated in the initiation complex to fine-tune protein synthesis. Our study thus expands the current understanding of protein synthesis, and adds another dimension of complexity to translational control of cellular proteins.

scholarly journals Structural differences in translation initiation between pathogenic trypanosomatids and their mammalian hosts

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Bochler ◽  
Jailson Brito Querido ◽  
Terezie Prilepskaja ◽  
Heddy Soufari ◽  
Angelita Simonetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Trypanosoma Cruzi ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Mass Spectrometry Data ◽  
Initiation Complex ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factors ◽  
Structural Differences

SUMMARYCanonical mRNA translation in eukaryotes begins with the formation of the 43S pre-initiation complex (PIC). Its assembly requires the binding of several eukaryotic initiation factors (eIF 1, 1A, 2, 3 and 5), Met-tRNAiMet and the small ribosomal subunit (40S). Compared to their mammalian hosts, trypanosomatids present significant structural differences in their 40S suggesting substantial variability in translation initiation. Here we determined the structure of the 43S PIC from Trypanosoma cruzi, the parasite causing the Chagas disease. Our structure shows numerous specific features, such as the variant eIF3 structure and its unique interactions with the large rRNA ESs 9S, 7S and 6S, and the association of a kinetoplastid-specific ~245 kDa DDX60-like helicase. It also revealed the so-far-elusive 40S-binding site of the eIF5 C-terminal domain and the structures of key terminal tails of several conserved eIFs underlying their activities within the PIC. Our results are corroborated by GST-pulldown assays in both human and T. cruzi and mass-spectrometry data.

scholarly journals Role of Eukaryotic Initiation Factors during Cellular Stress and Cancer Progression

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Divya Khandige Sharma ◽  
Kamiko Bressler ◽  
Harshil Patel ◽  
Nirujah Balasingam ◽  
Nehal Thakor
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Tumor Development ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Translation Control ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factors ◽  
Rate Limiting Step ◽  
Precise Understanding

Protein synthesis can be segmented into distinct phases comprising mRNA translation initiation, elongation, and termination. Translation initiation is a highly regulated and rate-limiting step of protein synthesis that requires more than 12 eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs). Extensive evidence shows that the transcriptome and corresponding proteome do not invariably correlate with each other in a variety of contexts. In particular, translation of mRNAs specific to angiogenesis, tumor development, and apoptosis is altered during physiological and pathophysiological stress conditions. In cancer cells, the expression and functions of eIFs are hampered, resulting in the inhibition of global translation and enhancement of translation of subsets of mRNAs by alternative mechanisms. A precise understanding of mechanisms involving eukaryotic initiation factors leading to differential protein expression can help us to design better strategies to diagnose and treat cancer. The high spatial and temporal resolution of translation control can have an immediate effect on the microenvironment of the cell in comparison with changes in transcription. The dysregulation of mRNA translation mechanisms is increasingly being exploited as a target to treat cancer. In this review, we will focus on this context by describing both canonical and noncanonical roles of eIFs, which alter mRNA translation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document