scholarly journals Inorganic polyphosphate kinase is required to stimulate protein degradation and for adaptation to amino acid starvation in Escherichia coli

1999 ◽  
Vol 96 (25) ◽  
pp. 14264-14269 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kuroda ◽  
S. Tanaka ◽  
T. Ikeda ◽  
J. Kato ◽  
N. Takiguchi ◽  
...  
1998 ◽  
Vol 180 (8) ◽  
pp. 2186-2193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narayana N. Rao ◽  
Shengjiang Liu ◽  
Arthur Kornberg

ABSTRACT Escherichia coli transiently accumulates large amounts of inorganic polyphosphate (polyP), up to 20 mM in phosphate residues (Pi), in media deficient in both Pi and amino acids. This transient accumulation is preceded by the appearance of nucleotides ppGpp and pppGpp, generated in response to nutritional stresses. Mutants which lack PhoB, the response regulator of the phosphate regulon, do not accumulate polyP even though they develop wild-type levels of (p)ppGpp when subjected to amino acid starvation. When complemented with a phoB-containing plasmid,phoB mutants regain the ability to accumulate polyP. PolyP accumulation requires high levels of (p)ppGpp independent of whether they are generated by RelA (active during the stringent response) or SpoT (expressed during Pi starvation). Hence, accumulation of polyP requires a functional phoB gene and elevated levels of (p)ppGpp. A rapid assay of polyP depends on its adsorption to an anion-exchange disk on which it is hydrolyzed by a yeast exopolyphosphatase.


1978 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Roche ◽  
A. J. Cozzone ◽  
P. Donini ◽  
V. Santonastaso

2001 ◽  
Vol 183 (2) ◽  
pp. 570-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Gropp ◽  
Yael Strausz ◽  
Miriam Gross ◽  
Gad Glaser

ABSTRACT The E. coli RelA protein is a ribosome-dependent (p)ppGpp synthetase that is activated in response to amino acid starvation. RelA can be dissected both functionally and physically into two domains: The N-terminal domain (NTD) (amino acids [aa] 1 to 455) contains the catalytic domain of RelA, and the C-terminal domain (CTD) (aa 455 to 744) is involved in regulating RelA activity. We used mutational analysis to localize sites important for RelA activity and control in these two domains. We inserted two separate mutations into the NTD, which resulted in mutated RelA proteins that were impaired in their ability to synthesize (p)ppGpp. When we caused the CTD inrelA + cells to be overexpressed, (p)ppGpp accumulation during amino acid starvation was negatively affected. Mutational analysis showed that Cys-612, Asp-637, and Cys-638, found in a conserved amino acid sequence (aa 612 to 638), are essential for this negative effect of the CTD. When mutations corresponding to these residues were inserted into the full-length relA gene, the mutated RelA proteins were impaired in their regulation. In attempting to clarify the mechanism through which the CTD regulates RelA activity, we found no evidence for competition for ribosomal binding between the normal RelA and the overexpressed CTD. Results from CyaA complementation experiments of the bacterial two-hybrid system fusion plasmids (G. Karimova, J. Pidoux, A. Ullmann, and D. Ladant, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:5752–5756, 1998) indicated that the CTD (aa 564 to 744) is involved in RelA-RelA interactions. Our findings support a model in which RelA activation is regulated by its oligomerization state.


1965 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. C. R. Reeve ◽  
J. O. Bishop

A multi-step Chloramphenicol (CM)-resistant derivative of an RC-stringent strain of Escherichia coli auxotrophic for threonine and leucine was resistant also to Aureomycin (AM) and Puromycin (PM). All three antibiotics released the repression of RNA synthesis due to amino acid starvation in the CM-sensitive parent strain, their relative activities being about 1:10:100 for AM: CM: PM. High doses of AM and CM failed to induce RNA synthesis. The CM-resistant strain required greater concentrations of each antibiotic than the sensitive strain to induce the same level of RNA synthesis, and appeared to be about one hundred times, ten times and five times more resistant to CM, AM and PM, respectively, than the sensitive strain.


Biologia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Achbergerová ◽  
Jozef Nahálka

AbstractPolyphosphate kinases (PPKs) catalyse the polymerisation and degradation of polyphosphate chains. As a result of this process, PPK produces or consumes energy in the form of ATP. Polyphosphate is a linear molecule that contains tens to hundreds of phosphate residues connected by macroergic bonds, and it appears to be an easily obtainable and rich source of energy from prebiotic times to the present. Notably, polyphosphate is present in the cells of all three domains of life, but PPKs are widely distributed only in Bacteria, as Archaea and Eucarya use various unrelated or “nonhomologous” proteins for energy and metabolic balance. The present study focuses on PPK1 and PPK2 homologues, which have been described to some extent in Bacteria, and the aim was to determine which homologue group, PPK1 or PPK2, is older. Phylogenetic analyses of 109 sequence homologues of Escherichia coli PPK1 and 109 sequence homologues of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PPK2 from 109 bacterial genomes imply that polyphosphate consumption (PPK2) evolved first and that phosphate polymerisation (PPK1) evolved later. Independently, a theory of the trends in amino acid loss and gain also confirms that PPK2 is older than PPK1. According to the results of this study, we propose 68 hypothetical proteins to mark as PPK2 homologues and 3 hypothetical proteins to mark as PPK1 homologues.


1960 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 491-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avram Goldstein ◽  
Beverly J. Brown

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (8) ◽  
pp. 2602-2608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kei Motomura ◽  
Ryuichi Hirota ◽  
Mai Okada ◽  
Takeshi Ikeda ◽  
Takenori Ishida ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTInorganic polyphosphate (polyP) is a linear polymer of tens to hundreds of phosphate (Pi) residues linked by “high-energy” phosphoanhydride bonds as in ATP. PolyP kinases, responsible for the synthesis and utilization of polyP, are divided into two families (PPK1 and PPK2) due to differences in amino acid sequence and kinetic properties. PPK2 catalyzes preferentially polyP-driven nucleotide phosphorylation (utilization of polyP), which is important for the survival of microbial cells under conditions of stress or pathogenesis. Phylogenetic analysis suggested that the PPK2 family could be divided into three subfamilies (classes I, II, and III). Class I and II PPK2s catalyze nucleoside diphosphate and nucleoside monophosphate phosphorylation, respectively. Here, we demonstrated that class III PPK2 catalyzes both nucleoside monophosphate and nucleoside diphosphate phosphorylation, thereby enabling us to synthesize ATP from AMP by a single enzyme. Moreover, class III PPK2 showed broad substrate specificity over purine and pyrimidine bases. This is the first demonstration that class III PPK2 possesses both class I and II activities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document