scholarly journals Light Causes Phosphorylation of Nonactivated Visual Pigments in Intact Mouse Rod Photoreceptor Cells

2005 ◽  
Vol 280 (50) ◽  
pp. 41184-41191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang W. Shi ◽  
Jiayan Chen ◽  
Francis Concepcion ◽  
Khatereh Motamedchaboki ◽  
Paul Marjoram ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Anju D. ◽  
Pushpa Raj Poudel ◽  
Ajoy Viswam ◽  
Ashwini M. J.

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is an inherited, degenerative eye disease that causes severe vision impairment due to the progressive degeneration of rod photoreceptor cells in retina. This form of retinal dystrophy manifests initial symptoms independentof age; thus, RP diagnosis occurs anywhere from early infancy to late adulthood. This primary pigmentary retinal dystrophy is a hereditary disorder predominantly affecting the rods more than the cones. The main classical triads of retinitis pigmentosa are arteriolar attenuation, Retinal bone spicule pigmentation and Waxy disc pallor. The main treatment of retinitis pigmentosa is by using Low vision aids (LVA) and Genetic counseling. As such a complete cure for retinitis pigmentosa is not present. So a treatment protocol has to be adopted that helps in at least the symptomatic relief. In Ayurveda, the signs and symptoms of this can be compared with the Lakshanas of Doshandha which is one among the Dristigata Roga. It is considered as a diseased condition in which sunset will obliterate the Dristi Mandala and makes the person blind at night time. During morning hours the rising sunrays will disperse the accumulated Dosas from Dristi to clear vision. This disease resembles Kaphajatimira in its pathogenesis, but the night blindness is the special feature. Since the disease is purely Kaphaja, a treatment attempt is planned in Kaphara and Brimhana line. The present paper discusses a case of retinitis pigmentosa and it’s Ayurvedic Treatment.


2002 ◽  
Vol 42 (supplement2) ◽  
pp. S26
Author(s):  
S. Tachibanaki ◽  
S. Tsushima ◽  
Y. Shimauchi-Matsukawa ◽  
S. Kawamura

1984 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 834-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
N D Das ◽  
R J Ulshafer ◽  
Z S Zam ◽  
V R Leverenz ◽  
H Shichi

Two monoclonal antibodies (RSA1/83 and RSA2/83) were developed against a homogeneous preparation of bovine retinal S-antigen. The two hybridomas produced by mouse X mouse hybrid myeloma cells secrete immunoglobulin G. Indirect autoradiography on glutaraldehyde-fixed preparations of bovine explants was used to locate the antigenic site. Antibody RSA1/83 recognizes the antigen primarily in the apical region of the rod outer segment, while antibody RSA2/83 located the antigen both in the outer and inner segments of the rod photoreceptor cells. A distinct band of silver grains also appeared along the inner limiting membrane with both antibodies. Control explants showed no specific labeling pattern over the various retinal compartments.


1984 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 1788-1795 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Nir ◽  
D Cohen ◽  
D S Papermaster

Mature retinal rod photoreceptors sequester opsin in the disk and plasma membranes of the rod outer segment (ROS). Opsin is synthesized in the inner segment and is transferred to the outer segment along the connecting cilium that joins the two compartments. We have investigated early stages of retinal development during which the polarized distribution of opsin is established in the rod photoreceptor cell. Retinas were isolated from newborn rats, 3-21 d old, and incubated with affinity purified biotinyl-sheep anti-bovine opsin followed by avidin-ferritin. At early postnatal ages prior to the development of the ROS, opsin is labeled by antiopsin on the inner segment plasma membrane. At the fifth postnatal day, as ROS formation begins opsin was detected on the connecting cilium plasma membrane. However, the labeling density of the ciliary plasma membrane was not uniform: the proximal cilium was relatively unlabeled in comparison with the distal cilium and the ROS plasma membrane. In nearly mature rat retinas, opsin was no longer detected on the inner segment plasma membrane. A similar polarized distribution of opsin was also observed in adult human rod photoreceptor cells labeled with the same antibodies. These results suggest that some component(s) of the connecting cilium and its plasma membrane may participate in establishing and maintaining the polarized distribution of opsin.


2003 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETRI ALA-LAURILA ◽  
RAULI-JAN ALBERT ◽  
PIA SAARINEN ◽  
ARI KOSKELAINEN ◽  
KRISTIAN DONNER

Effects of temperature on the spectral properties of visual pigments were measured in the physiological range (5–28°C) in photoreceptor cells of bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) and crucian carp (Carassius carassius). Absorbance spectra recorded by microspectrophotometry (MSP) in single cells and sensitivity spectra recorded by electroretinography (ERG) across the isolated retina were combined to yield accurate composite spectra fromca. 400 nm to 800 nm. The four photoreceptor types selected for study allowed three comparisons illuminating the properties of pigments using the dehydroretinal (A2) chromophore: (1) the two members of an A1/A2 pigment pair with the same opsin (porphyropsinvs.rhodopsin in bullfrog “red” rods); (2) two A2 pigments with similar spectra (porphyropsin rods of bullfrog and crucian carp); and (3) two A2 pigments with different spectra (rodsvs.long-wavelength-sensitive (L-) cones of crucian carp). Qualitatively, the temperature effects on A2 pigments were similar to those described previously for the A1 pigment of toad “red” rods. Warming caused an increase in relative sensitivities at very long wavelengths but additionally a small shift of λmaxtoward shorter wavelengths. The former effect was used for estimating the minimum energy required for photoactivation (Ea) of the pigment. Bullfrog rod opsin with A2 chromophore hadEa= 44.2 ± 0.9 kcal/mol, significantly lower (one-tailedP< 0.05) than the valueEa= 46.5 ± 0.8 kcal/mol for the same opsin coupled to A1. The A2 rod pigment of crucian carp hadEa= 42.3 ± 0.6 kcal/mol, which is significantly higher (one-tailedP< 0.01) than that of the L-cones in the same retina (Ea= 38.3 ± 0.4 kcal/mol), whereas the difference compared with the bullfrog A2 rod pigment is not statistically significant (two-tailedP= 0.13). No strict connection between λmaxandEaappears to exist among A2 pigments any more than among A1 pigments. Still, the A1 → A2 chromophore substitution in bullfrog opsin causes three changes correlated as originally hypothesized by Barlow (1957): a red-shift of λmax, a decrease inEa, and an increase in thermal noise.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document