The last Paragraph of David Nott's review of Doble and Fawcett's Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching, publised in JFLS 6: 245–247, should have appeared as follows, containing the emboldened section:Pressures for change in language teaching are increasingly resources-driven (shortage or high cost of human resources, and promotion of electronic resources), whereas, as many of these papers amply demonstrate, the crucial requirements for language learners are those of personal and cultural competence, which cannot be acquired in the language laboratory of the 1960s or the CALL laboratory of the 1990s ‘pareillement au savoir qui ne mène pas forcément au savoir-faire, le technologie n'aboutit pas à la parole. Un didacticiel n'exerce pas de compétence de sens’ (Namenwirth, 1994: 277); ‘In the case of adults learning an advanced L2, conceptualising the message may be a process which is not dependent on the foreign language’ (Towell, p. 17).The Editors sincerely apologies for the omission.
MOBILE PHONE AS A COMPONENT OF DIGITAL FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING TECHNOLOGY
