2.'…post-colonialism, multi-culturalism, structuralism, feminism, post-modernism and so on and so forth': A comparative analysis of vague category markers in academic discourse

Author(s):  
Steve Walsh ◽  
Anne O'Keeffe ◽  
Michael McCarthy
2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 115-117
Author(s):  
Abbas Barzegar

Firmly situated in the field of legal anthropology, Arzoo Osanloo’s ThePolitics of Women’s Rights in Iran is an ethnographic treatment of women’srights discourse in contemporary Iran. It is concerned with unraveling theassumed paradoxes involved in administering a republican theocracy thatattempts to incorporate both divinely inspired legal injunctions and representativeforms of governance.Whereas many conversations concerning human rights and Islam aredrowned in contention, normativity, and exegetical speculation, Osanloo’scontribution steadily manages to remain above the fray. This is done by placingthe discourse of women’s rights within the cultural context of globalizationand post-colonialism and yet still identifying its local, embodiedpractice within the shifting political dynamics of post-revolutionary Iran. Tothis end, through exploring the lives of upper-middle class women in Tehranand their encounters with the emerging Islamo-republican state, the authorexplores the “conditions [that] have allowed for the discussion of rights tomaterialize in a language that was unacceptable just after the revolution…”(p. 7), while paying close attention to the ways in which contemporary Iranrepresents a vernacular modernity expressed through “a hybrid discoursethat locates a distinctive form of modernity at the juncture of Islamic revivalismand Western political and legal institutions” (p. 8).Her theoretical and methodological approach, which incorporates elementsof post-colonialism and post-modernism, is presented in a shortintroudction. Guiding concepts such as “rights as discursive practice,” “dialogicalsites,” and “subjectivization” thus readily inform her mobilizationand treatment of the data. Thankfully, her concern for methodological precisiondoes not obscure or consume the narrative form through which she putsforth her thesis in the remainder of the text ...


2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 493-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastiano Maffettone

Post-colonial theories present narratives of discontent based on resentment toward colonial exploitation and cultural hegemony. The substance matter of post-colonial narratives (their first-order argument) is sound. Post-colonial theories often rely on a post-modern philosophical argumentative structure (their second-order argument). The second-order argument is not able to support the first-order argument. In particular, the nihilist consequences of post-modernism make impossible the construction of a (post-colonial) discourse through which the discontent is transformed in a basis for a reasonable political action. The lack of such a discourse is a source of intellectual despair and predisposes to political fragmentation. Moreover, protest without arguments often coincides with violence. Within a liberal view of justice it is possible to represent post-colonialism as a critical stance.


Author(s):  
Anna Stebletsova

This review paper discusses the concept of academic discourse as one of the most rapidly developing branches in contemporary linguistic research. The objective of the review was to observe and analyze basic paradigms and approaches to academic discourse in applied linguistics, genre analysis and discourse analysis developed by British, American and European linguists and examine academic discourse issues. The timeline of the review includes three periods from the middle of the 20 th century to the present. The focus on the Anglophone literature is determined by the historical interrelation between academic discourse research and English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and by an increase of national research of academic discourse and EAP. The review demonstrates evolution of academic discourse research approaches according to the time periods and domineering concepts. The review results demonstrate the contribution of Swales' genre analysis approach to the development of academic discourse research and learning. The author indicates that current research into academic discourse obviously has a cross-disciplinary trend and is based on the combination of comparative analysis and corpus linguistics methods. The author makes a conclusion that this trend will remain a significant part of academic discourse investigation and results in an increase of national publications addressing the academic discourse issues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document