How does China’s industrial policy affect firms’ R&D investment? Evidence from ‘China Manufacturing 2025’

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huwei Wen ◽  
Zhao Zhao
Author(s):  
Keun Lee

The chapter presents a Schumpeterian and capability-based view of industrial policy, reflecting upon its practices in Korea over the last several decades. Given that it is typical for many developing countries to suffer from capability failure, industrial policy should go beyond correcting market failure and aim at overcoming capability failure. It is not about picking winners but about picking good students and allowing them time to learn and build capabilities until they are able to compete with incumbent firms from developed countries. This chapter discusses specific industrial policy tools practised in Korea at different stages of its development: tariffs to protect infant industry; technology import licensing to promote building of absorptive capacity; entry control guaranteeing rents for fixed and R&D investment; and public‒private joint R&D to break into higher-end products and sectors. While these tools look different in their concrete contents, they all allow some rents for the targeted sectors, which can be used to pay for building production capabilities in the case of tariffs or technology licensing in the 1970s, investment capabilities in entry control in the 1980s, and technological (R&D) capabilities in the case of public‒private joint R&D in the 1990s.


Author(s):  
Lindsay Whitfield ◽  
Ole Therkildsen ◽  
Lars Buur ◽  
Anne Mette Kjar
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
pp. 45-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Osmakov ◽  
A. Kalinin

The article considers the problems of industrial policy and, accordingly, the industrial development strategy from the standpoint of the challenges facing the industry, the conditions for the adoption of strategic decisions and possible answers - the key directions of state activities. The main principles and directions are analyzed: investment, foreign trade, technological policies, certain aspects of territorial planning, state corporate and social policies. Proposals on the prospective goal-setting and possible results of industrial policy have been formulated.


2009 ◽  
pp. 54-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Shastitko ◽  
S. Avdasheva ◽  
S. Golovanova

The analysis of competition policy under economic crisis is motivated by the fact that competition is a key factor for the level of productivity. The latter, in its turn, influences the scope and length of economic recession. In many Russian markets buyers' gains decline because of the weakness of competition, since suppliers are reluctant to cut prices in spite of the decreasing demand. Data on prices in Russia and abroad in the second half of 2008 show asymmetric price rigidity. At least two questions are important under economic crisis: the 'division of labor' between pro-active and protective tools of competition policy and the impact of anti-crisis policy on competition. Protective competition policy is insufficient in transition economy, especially in the days of crisis it should be supplemented with the well-designed industrial policy measures which do not contradict the goals of competition. The preferable tools of anti-crisis policy are also those that do not restrain competition.


2014 ◽  
pp. 33-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Cimini ◽  
Alessandro Gaetano ◽  
Alessandra Pagani

In this paper, we investigate the relation between the different accounting treatments of R&D expenditures and the risk of the entity in order to identify under which treatment insiders are more likely to carry out earnings management. By analysing the R&D investment strategies of a sample of 137 listed Italian entities that complied with the requirements of IAS 38 during fiscal year 2009, following Lantz and Sahut (2005), we calculate several indexes that show the preferences of insiders to account R&D expenditures as costs or capital assets, and we study the relation of such preferences with the risk of the entity, which we measure with the unlevered beta. We hypothesize that the entities, which considered the R&D investments as costs, are the riskiest ones due to the higher probability that insiders carried out earnings management. Our results confirm such hypothesis. This paper could have implications for academics and standard setters that could learn that behind accounting discretion, insiders could opportunistically behave against outsiders.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document