Domain inversion in LiNbO3optical waveguides

1994 ◽  
Vol 157 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Rosenman ◽  
V. D. Kugel ◽  
N. Angert
Keyword(s):  
2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 1509-1511 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Courjal ◽  
H. Porte ◽  
A. Martinez ◽  
J.-P. Goedgebuer

2018 ◽  
Vol 113 (25) ◽  
pp. 252901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Imbrock ◽  
Haissam Hanafi ◽  
Mousa Ayoub ◽  
Cornelia Denz

2002 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 700-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunlin Chen ◽  
Jingjun Xu ◽  
Yongfa Kong ◽  
Shaolin Chen ◽  
Guangyin Zhang ◽  
...  

MRS Bulletin ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 968-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iulia Muntele

1992 ◽  
Vol 60 (23) ◽  
pp. 2828-2830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan C. G. Nutt ◽  
Venkatraman Gopalan ◽  
Mool C. Gupta

1996 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. W. Hu ◽  
P. A. Thomas ◽  
J. Webjörn

Periodic domain inversion in an electric field poled LiNbO3 crystal has been studied using high-resolution multiple-crystal multiple-reflection X-ray diffraction topography. Fine linear contrast with spacings that correspond to the lateral dimensions of the periodic pattern has been observed by the choice of an appropriate diffraction mode to provide high spatial resolution and is shown to arise essentially from strains at the domain walls. The origin of the strain contrast at the domain walls is suggested primarily to be the result of the domain-inversion processing via the converse piezeoelectric effect. A structural model for the domain inversion that is based on a pseudosymmetry argument is invoked in order to quantify the ionic displacements for twinning. These results are compared with those obtained in a previous study employing a different diffraction mode [Hu, Thomas & Webjörn (1995). J. Phys. D, 28, A189–A194].


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Cavalca ◽  
R.P. Fletcher ◽  
M. Shadrina ◽  
C. Leone ◽  
L. Leon

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Shadrina ◽  
C. Leone ◽  
M. Cavalca ◽  
R. Fletcher ◽  
M. Gherasim
Keyword(s):  

Geophysics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. R167-R173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wansoo Ha ◽  
Changsoo Shin

Laplace-domain inversions generate long-wavelength velocity models from synthetic and field data sets, unlike full-waveform inversions in the time or frequency domain. By examining the gradient directions of Laplace-domain inversions, we explain why they result in long-wavelength velocity models. The gradient direction of the inversion is calculated by multiplying the virtual source and the back-propagated wavefield. The virtual source has long-wavelength features because it is the product of the smooth forward-modeled wavefield and the partial derivative of the impedance matrix, which depends on the long-wavelength initial velocity used in the inversion. The back-propagated wavefield exhibits mild variations, except for near the receiver, in spite of the short-wavelength components in the residual. The smooth back-propagated wavefield results from the low-wavenumber pass-filtering effects of Laplace-domain Green’s function, which attenuates the high-wavenumber components of the residuals more rapidly than the low-wavenumber components. Accordingly, the gradient direction and the inversion results are smooth. Examples of inverting field data acquired in the Gulf of Mexico exhibit long-wavelength gradients and confirm the generation of long-wavelength velocity models by Laplace-domain inversion. The inversion of moving-average filtered data without short-wavelength features shows that the Laplace-domain inversion is not greatly affected by the high-wavenumber components in the field data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document