The generation of educational practice from developmental theory

1979 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank B. Murray
2021 ◽  
Vol XII (4 (37)) ◽  
pp. 137-148
Author(s):  
Marzanna KIELAR

This article describes the process of meaning making in the context of educational practice. It starts with presentations of chosen elements of construct-developmental theory. The Author presents models of constructive development researchers and shows their meaning in education. Then she describes patterns of meaning making in educational context. At the end she presents principles and practices of teaching in a developmental manner.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandria Viegut

Algebra knowledge is an important gatekeeper to educational and economic opportunity. Both math education researchers and psychologists have shown that fractions may be a key to this gate (e.g., Hackenberg, 2013; Siegler et al., 2012). However, psychological and educational research on the fractions-algebra association has been disconnected, with separate frameworks, definitions, and designs. This integrative review synthesizes evidence from both disciplines about how and why fractions knowledge leads to stronger algebra knowledge. I suggest that the strength of causal evidence is limited by idiosyncratic measurement, limited longitudinal research, and imprecise definitions. I also review six plausible fractions-to-algebra mechanisms, which future research should empirically test. Throughout, I argue that more nuanced understanding of the fractions-algebra association will require interdisciplinary teams. Finally, I propose an integrative conceptual model of how fractions knowledge may lead to success in algebra and suggest new directions for collaborative investigation to inform developmental theory and educational practice.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 40-54
Author(s):  
Jamie B. Boster ◽  
Joann P. Benigno ◽  
John W. McCarthy

Innovations in technology have resulted in increased use of tablets, mobile devices, and applications as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems for children with complex communication needs (CCN). Although research has been conducted on the specific characteristics of AAC technologies, many interfaces remain replications of prior communication devices with little consideration of the features of newer platforms. A greater concern is that these interfaces may not be based on empirical evidence or derived from key developmental language theories. As such, these interfaces may place additional demands on children with CCN instead of supporting their development of language content, form, and use. The purpose of this paper is to discuss potential interface supports for AAC systems that capitalize on current technologies and draw upon key tenets of developmental theory.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Demick ◽  
Danielle Sclafani ◽  
Joshua Chu ◽  
Jacquelyn Silva ◽  
Armide Storey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document